From 263171bdd4806dc8401b1055200d897ddb020b1f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: ZephCore T096 Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 20:13:29 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] tests: sync catalog.json labels with f8a4992 prefs size bump UNIT-PREFS-001 and UNIT-PREFS-006 still said 272/311-byte in catalog.json while prefs_codec_tests.cpp was bumped to 273/312 by f8a4992. Same ID sets on both sides (missing=[], unexpected=[]) but differing names made the executable/catalog dict comparison fail, which is exactly what CI's host regression job flagged. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 --- tests/catalog.json | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/catalog.json b/tests/catalog.json index 3f456a5..4d5cd48 100644 --- a/tests/catalog.json +++ b/tests/catalog.json @@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ }, { "id": "UNIT-PREFS-001", - "name": "Companion prefs encode to the documented 272-byte layout", + "name": "Companion prefs encode to the documented 273-byte layout", "source": "tests/unit/prefs_codec_tests.cpp" }, { @@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ }, { "id": "UNIT-PREFS-006", - "name": "Server prefs encode to the documented 311-byte layout", + "name": "Server prefs encode to the documented 312-byte layout", "source": "tests/unit/prefs_codec_tests.cpp" }, {