# MIGRATIONS — async vs sync policy CoreScope's ingestor applies schema/data migrations inline at boot in `cmd/ingestor/db.go`. Every migration that runs synchronously blocks the ingestor from accepting packets until it returns. On a dev DB that's milliseconds; at prod scale (1.9M+ observations, 80K+ adverts, 2600+ nodes on Cascadia) it can pin the boot for minutes and trigger restart loops — the "upgrade broke prod" failure class (#791, #1483, and others). ## The rule **Any new `CREATE INDEX`, `ALTER TABLE`, or data-rewriting `UPDATE`/`DELETE` in a migration file MUST do ONE of the following:** ### Option 1 — Run via `Store.RunAsyncMigration` (preferred for backfills) ```go // Scheduled in OpenStore() AFTER the *Store is constructed. if err := s.RunAsyncMigration(ctx, "my_migration_v1", func(ctx context.Context, db *sql.DB) error { _, err := db.ExecContext(ctx, `CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS ...`) return err }); err != nil { log.Printf("[migration/async] scheduling failed: %v", err) } ``` - The migration is recorded as `pending_async` in the `_async_migrations` table **immediately** — the ingestor boots and starts ingesting. - `fn` runs in a goroutine; the WaitGroup is shared with the rest of the ingestor (`Store.WaitForAsyncMigrations()` waits for everything). - On success the row flips to `done`; on error/panic to `failed` with the error message captured. - Idempotent: rows in `done` state short-circuit; `failed`/`pending_async` rows are retried on the next boot. Reference implementations: `Store.BackfillPathJSONAsync` (path_json backfill) and the converted `obs_observer_ts_idx_v1` index build in `OpenStore`. ### Option 2 — Annotate as preflight-cheap Some migrations are genuinely cheap at any scale (e.g. `ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN`, `CREATE INDEX` on a table you know is bounded to a few thousand rows). Annotate the migration block with a comment **on the line immediately above the migration block** so the preflight gate recognises the opt-out: ```go // PREFLIGHT: async=true reason="ALTER ADD COLUMN — O(1) sqlite operation" if r := db.QueryRow("SELECT 1 FROM _migrations WHERE name = 'foo_v1'"); ... ``` The reason MUST be a real one-line justification you can defend in review. "It's fine" is not a reason. ### Option 3 — Opt out per PR If the migration is genuinely safe and you don't want to add an inline annotation, put a single line in the PR body: ``` PREFLIGHT-MIGRATION-SCALE: <30s N=80K verified on Cascadia staging snapshot ``` This must include both `<30s` and `N=` so a reviewer can challenge the measurement. ## The gate `~/.openclaw/skills/pr-preflight/scripts/check-async-migrations.sh` runs on every PR via the preflight orchestrator. It greps the diff for new or modified migration blocks (files matching `cmd/ingestor/db.go`, `cmd/ingestor/maintenance.go`, `internal/dbschema/**`, `**/migrations/**`, `**/*.sql`, plus any Go file touching `CREATE INDEX` / `ALTER TABLE` / `CREATE UNIQUE INDEX`). For each hit it requires one of the three opt-outs above. Hard-fail (exit 1) — no warning-only mode. ## Concurrency model CoreScope runs **one ingestor process** per deployment (`cmd/ingestor/`, single binary, single `*Store`). There is no cluster mode, no leader election, no second writer. SQLite is opened with `SetMaxOpenConns(1)` and a 5s `busy_timeout`; all writes (live MQTT ingest + async migration goroutines + maintenance backfills) serialize through the one connection in a single process. What this means for async migrations: - **No cross-process race** to worry about. Two ingestor instances running against the same DB is not a supported deployment shape. - **Within a single process**, concurrent `RunAsyncMigration(name=X)` callers race the initial `SELECT status` → `UPDATE/INSERT` step. The current implementation re-schedules `fn` on a pending/failed row so a duplicate caller may legitimately re-run it; once status is `done` all further calls short-circuit. See `TestRunAsyncMigration_ConcurrentSameNameSerialized` for the contract. - **`fn` runs concurrently with live ingest writers.** Because `MaxOpenConns=1`, a long `CREATE INDEX` will serialize behind / ahead of insert batches via SQLite's busy-timeout. This is acceptable for index builds (the boot path is unblocked, which was the whole point), but it means long migrations DO add latency to live writes. Document expected runtime in the `reason=` annotation and prefer batched/chunked fn implementations for multi-minute work (see `BackfillPathJSONAsync` for the canonical batched pattern with inter-batch `time.Sleep`). ## Scale budgets Per-migration target: **<30s** at current prod scale (Cascadia: ~2,600 nodes, ~80K observations; previous prod snapshot: ~1.9M observations). Worked example (#1483, `obs_observer_ts_idx_v1`): composite index build on `observations(observer_idx, timestamp)`. At ~1.9M rows the sync build pinned ingestor boot for several minutes → restart loop. Converted to async via `RunAsyncMigration` in `OpenStore` so boot returns immediately and the index materializes in the background; the existing `_migrations` short-circuit at the top of the migration block ensures DBs that already completed the sync v3.8.3 build do NOT re-run it through the goroutine path on subsequent boots. If you cannot meet the <30s budget, document the expected upper bound and operator runbook expectation (e.g. "index build expected ~10 min on a 5M-row table; ingestor remains responsive; monitor via `SELECT status, error FROM _async_migrations WHERE name = ...`"). ## Why this exists Pattern that keeps repeating: 1. Author writes `CREATE INDEX foo ON observations(...)` in a migration. 2. Local dev DB has ~100 rows. Migration returns in 1ms. CI is green. 3. Reviewer focuses on plan correctness, not scale. 4. Ship. 5. Prod boots, sqlite scans 1.9M rows, the ingestor sits at `[migration] Adding index...` for 8 minutes, healthcheck times out, container restarts, loops. 6. Operator pages. Hotfix. Apology. The gate doesn't try to detect table size (undecidable from a diff). It enforces **annotation discipline**: every author who adds a migration must consciously decide which bucket it falls into and write that down. That is the cheapest possible intervention that breaks the cycle.