Files
meshcore-analyzer/.github/workflows
Kpa-clawbot d1e6c733dc fix(nav): apply Priority+ at all widths (#1055) (#1097)
## Summary

Make the top-nav use the **Priority+ pattern at all widths** (not just
768–1279px), so the nav-right cluster never gets pushed off-screen or
visually overlapped by the link strip.

Fixes #1055.

## What changed

**`public/style.css`** — nav section only (clearly fenced):
- Removed the upper bound on the Priority+ media query (`max-width:
1279px`). The rule now applies at any viewport `>= 768px`. Above that
breakpoint, only `data-priority="high"` links render inline; the rest
collapse into the existing `More ▾` overflow menu.
- Swapped nav-only hardcoded spacing/type to the fluid `clamp()` tokens
shipped in #1054:
  - `.top-nav` padding → `var(--gutter)`
  - `.nav-left` gap → `var(--space-lg)`
  - `.nav-brand` gap → `var(--space-sm)`, font-size → `var(--fs-md)`
  - `.nav-links` gap → `var(--space-xs)`
- `.nav-link` padding → `clamp(8px, 0.6vw + 4px, 14px)`, font-size →
`var(--fs-sm)`
  - `.nav-right` gap → `var(--space-sm)`
- Mobile (<768px) hamburger layout, the More-menu markup, and the JS
that builds the menu in `public/app.js` are unchanged — they already
supported this pattern.

`public/index.html` did not need changes — the `data-priority="high"`
markup, `nav-more-wrap`, `navMoreBtn`, and `navMoreMenu` are already in
place from earlier work.

## Why the bug existed

The previous Priority+ rule was scoped `@media (min-width: 768px) and
(max-width: 1279px)`. From 1280px–~1599px the full 11-link strip
rendered but didn't fit alongside `.nav-stats` + `.nav-right`. The
parent `overflow: hidden` masked the symptom, but the rightmost links
physically rendered underneath `.nav-right` and were unreachable.

## E2E assertion added

New `test-nav-fluid-1055-e2e.js` — Playwright multi-viewport test
(768/1024/1280/1440/1920) that asserts:

1. `.nav-right.right` ≤ `document.documentElement.clientWidth` (no
horizontal overflow)
2. Last visible `.nav-link.right` ≤ `.nav-right.left` (no overlap
underneath the right cluster)
3. `.top-nav.scrollWidth` ≤ `.top-nav.clientWidth` (no scrolled-off
content)

Wired into the `e2e-test` job in `.github/workflows/deploy.yml`.

**TDD evidence:**
- Red commit `466221a`: test passes 3/5 (1024/768/1920) — fails at 1280
(253px overlap) and 1440 (93px overlap).
- Green commit `1aa939a`: test passes 5/5.

## Acceptance criteria (from #1055)

- [x] Priority+ at ALL widths (not just mobile).
- [x] No nav link overflow at 1080px (or any tested width).
- [x] Overflow menu accessible via keyboard + touch (existing
`navMoreBtn` aria-haspopup wiring; verified by existing app.js
handlers).
- [x] Active route still highlighted when in overflow (existing logic in
`app.js` adds `.active` to the cloned link in `navMoreMenu`).
- [x] Tested at 768/1024/1280/1440/1920 — visible link count adapts (5
priority links + More menu at all desktop widths; full 11 inline only on
hamburger mobile when expanded).

---------

Co-authored-by: bot <bot@corescope>
Co-authored-by: clawbot <clawbot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: meshcore-bot <bot@meshcore.local>
2026-05-05 08:19:51 -07:00
..