Review found the same reply-limiter drop in two more places: the earthquake service's link post right after its alert, and the announcements command's 'sent' confirmation right after the announcement. Both now skip the reply limiter. multitest called wait_for_tx itself just before send_response, which waits again; with wait_for_tx claiming the slot that pre-wait made the reply wait a full extra interval, so it goes. A test that only documented RateLimiter's behavior, and guarded nothing, is replaced by an earthquake test that drives _check_earthquakes.
A user who raised bot_tx_rate_limit_seconds to 5 noticed wx's weather-then-alerts reply did not seem to honor it. The gap between those two messages was in fact longer than the limit (every send already waits on the bot TX limiter in _check_rate_limits, and wx sleeps limit + 1 s on top), but looking at it turned up two real bugs.
The second part of wx's and gwx's two-part reply, and every part after the first of 'alert all', went through the reply rate limiter (rate_limit_seconds, 10 s by default) a few seconds after the first part had used it, so it was refused: with default settings the alert message was never sent. These now pass skip_user_rate_limit=True, as the other multi-part senders already did. The repeater command's two-part branch gets the same change for consistency.
BotTxRateLimiter.wait_for_tx only checked the time since the last recorded transmission, and record_tx runs after the radio confirms, so concurrent senders (two replies, a reply and a scheduled message) all passed the wait before any of them recorded and transmitted back to back. wait_for_tx now claims the slot under the lock when it returns. A coverage test that monkeypatched can_tx to drive the old loop is rewritten against the new one.
agessaman