Praxis Software Structure Model
Module boundaries: images
Explains the package/module boundaries, number of files, number of symbols and cross-module dependencies of images.
How to read pictures
- This Package Diagram is centered on images, showing the file size, symbol size and cross-module dependencies observed when it serves as the boundary of project modules.
- The arrows in the figure represent the cross-module relationships observed by the local warehouse evidence, which are mainly used to understand the direction of technical dependencies; it is not the business process sequence, nor the runtime message timing.
- Currently no clear external module dependencies have been observed, which may indicate that the modules are relatively independent, or that the scanning granularity is not sufficient.
Technical complexity analysis
- images currently contains 36 files and 36 symbols belonging to the technical organizational boundaries identified by the software architecture model.
- The cross-module relationship is as follows: it is referenced or called 0 times by other modules, and it actively depends on or calls external modules 0 times, so its signs of reuse and signs of external collaboration are relatively close.
- Currently there is no obvious abnormality in external dependence, but specific business entrances should still be used to determine whether the direction of dependence is stable.
Relationship with business complexity
- images is not the business story itself, but the technical boundaries that may pass when business capabilities are implemented.
- If the evidence, entry or drill-down diagram of a Use Case in the organization/process model falls on images, the Use Case should be linked back to this Package Diagram to indicate which engineering module the business story is hosted by.
- The current association is still CANDIDATE: The technical boundaries can only be explained here based on warehouse evidence and cannot replace the confirmation of the business story, actors and business goals of the organizational/process model.
Governance suggestions
- When adding a new function, give priority to confirming that it belongs to the stable responsibilities of the module, rather than falling into this module because of the convenience of calling.
- Keep the module's dependency direction explainable to avoid forming an implicit public toolbox.
- When the business Use Case document references this module, the specific entry, call chain or configuration evidence should be recorded in the Use Case drill-down document.
UML/Technical Diagram
flowchart LR package_node["images"] package_node --- isolated["N"]
Coverage
- Module path: images
- Number of files: 36
- Number of symbols: 36
- Depends on or called by other modules: 0
- Depending on or calling external modules: 0
Drill down on semantic elements in the diagram
-
images
package
images is the central project boundary of the current Package Diagram, used to observe its own scale, dependency direction, and drill-down technical complexity.
- Technical roles
- Technical organization boundary: It aggregates files, symbols and cross-module relationships under images into a discussable engineering unit.
- Why it appears
- The local repository evidence observes enough files, symbols, or cross-module relationships under images so that it deserves to be promoted to a package-level entry in the software structure model.
- Relationship meaning
- The arrows pointing from images to other nodes in the figure indicate that the current boundary depends on external packages/modules; it is dependent on or called 0 times by other modules, and depends on or called external modules 0 times, which is used to determine whether it is more like a stable reuse boundary or an orchestration/bridging boundary.
- Drill-down intention
- Drill down on this node to view the key components, structural collaboration slices, running links, deployment nodes, and complexity hotspots within images to understand how this engineering boundary carries functional changes.
- Business correlation
- This node is not the business story itself, but the Use Case that falls into images in the organization/process model can refer to this as a technology carrying boundary. The current association is still CANDIDATE.
- Change impact
- Modifying the public entry, dependency direction or directory boundary of images may affect the verification path of component diagrams, sequence fragments, deployment configurations and related business stories that reference it.
- Confidence
- high
Evidence
- package scope: images
- Module path: images
- Number of files: 36
- Number of symbols: 36
- Depends on or called by other modules: 0
- Depending on or calling external modules: 0
- images/alert.png
- images/aprs.png
Risk
- If you only regard this node as a directory name, you will miss its responsibility as a stable project boundary.
- If signs of dependence on external modules continue to increase, it may be a sign that the boundary is taking on too much orchestration or bridging responsibility.
Problem
- No cross-module dependencies are observed in the current warehouse evidence; therefore, the module is temporarily processed according to the relative independence boundary, and the confidence level remains as a candidate.
Drill-down UML
There is currently no evidence-based link to a finer picture.
Evidence
- images/alert.png
- images/aprs.png
- images/AreaCleared.png
- images/BaseCamp.png
- images/ble_topbar.png
- images/Chat.png
- images/contract.png
- images/ext.png
Problem
- No cross-module dependencies are observed in the current warehouse evidence; therefore, the module is temporarily processed according to the relative independence boundary, and the confidence level remains as a candidate.