ChatService
Component · high
ChatService is a class candidate component in apps/nrf52_node, and the evidence anchor is apps/nrf52_node/src/nrf52_node_app_facade_runtime.h#L23; the current warehouse evidence shows that it has signs of local relationships and is suitable as a candidate anchor rather than a complete conclusion.
- Responsibility
- ChatService is considered a candidate architectural component in the current C4 Component View. This judgment is not determined by the name alone, but is jointly supported by apps/nrf52_node/src/nrf52_node_app_facade_runtime.h#L23, class type and local relationship signs, which are suitable as candidate anchors rather than complete conclusions.
- Boundary
- It belongs inside the apps/nrf52_node Container; collaboration beyond this path should be interpreted back to the Container or Sequence perspective in the software structure model.
- Relationship meaning
- ChatService is put into Component View because it can offload the architectural responsibilities of apps/nrf52_node to an inspectable entry, orchestration, adaptation, contract or shared object. Reuse signs and external collaboration signs are used to indicate whether it is more like a shared core, an external orchestrator, or a normal local object.
- Why it belongs to this layer
- It has a clear code anchor, but the current explanation target is not the source code details, but how to split the internal responsibilities of apps/nrf52_node, so it belongs to the C4 Component layer.
- Drill-down intention
- Drill down to the Code View or Component Diagram of the software structure model to view ChatService's file anchors, direct collaboration, and whether there is a risk of change diffusion.
ContactService
Component · high
ContactService is a class candidate component in apps/nrf52_node, and the evidence anchor is apps/nrf52_node/src/nrf52_node_app_facade_runtime.h#L30; the current warehouse evidence shows that it has signs of partial relationships and is suitable as a candidate anchor rather than a complete conclusion.
- Responsibility
- ContactService is considered a candidate architectural component in the current C4 Component View. This judgment is not determined by the name alone, but is jointly supported by apps/nrf52_node/src/nrf52_node_app_facade_runtime.h#L30, class type and local relationship signs, which are suitable as candidate anchors rather than complete conclusions.
- Boundary
- It belongs inside the apps/nrf52_node Container; collaboration beyond this path should be interpreted back to the Container or Sequence perspective in the software structure model.
- Relationship meaning
- ContactService is put into Component View because it offloads the architectural responsibilities of apps/nrf52_node to an inspectable entry, orchestration, adapter, contract or shared object. Reuse signs and external collaboration signs are used to indicate whether it is more like a shared core, an external orchestrator, or a normal local object.
- Why it belongs to this layer
- It has a clear code anchor, but the current explanation target is not the source code details, but how to split the internal responsibilities of apps/nrf52_node, so it belongs to the C4 Component layer.
- Drill-down intention
- Drill down to the Component Diagram of the Code View or software structure model to view the file anchors of ContactService, direct collaboration, and whether there is a risk of change diffusion.
IMeshAdapter
Component · high
IMeshAdapter is a class candidate component in apps/nrf52_node, and the evidence anchor is apps/nrf52_node/src/nrf52_node_app_facade_runtime.h#L25; the current warehouse evidence shows that it has signs of partial relationships and is suitable as a candidate anchor rather than a complete conclusion.
- Responsibility
- IMeshAdapter is considered an external capability adapter component in the current C4 Component View. This judgment is not determined by the name alone, but is jointly supported by apps/nrf52_node/src/nrf52_node_app_facade_runtime.h#L25, class type and local relationship signs, which are suitable as candidate anchors rather than complete conclusions.
- Boundary
- It belongs inside the apps/nrf52_node Container; collaboration beyond this path should be interpreted back to the Container or Sequence perspective in the software structure model.
- Relationship meaning
- IMeshAdapter was put into Component View because it offloads the architectural responsibilities of apps/nrf52_node to an inspectable entry, orchestration, adaptation, contract or shared object. Reuse signs and external collaboration signs are used to indicate whether it is more like a shared core, an external orchestrator, or a normal local object.
- Why it belongs to this layer
- It has a clear code anchor, but the current explanation target is not the source code details, but how to split the internal responsibilities of apps/nrf52_node, so it belongs to the C4 Component layer.
- Drill-down intention
- Drill down to the Component Diagram of the Code View or software structure model to view the IMeshAdapter's file anchors, direct collaboration, and whether there is a risk of change diffusion.
ScopedGpsSuspend
Component · medium
ScopedGpsSuspend is a class candidate component in apps/nrf52_node, and the evidence anchor is apps/nrf52_node/src/nrf52_node_app_facade_runtime.cpp#L45; the current warehouse evidence shows that it has signs of partial relationships and is suitable as a candidate anchor rather than a complete conclusion.
- Responsibility
- ScopedGpsSuspend is considered a candidate architectural component in the current C4 Component View. This judgment is not determined by the name alone, but is jointly supported by apps/nrf52_node/src/nrf52_node_app_facade_runtime.cpp#L45, class type, and local relationship signs, which are suitable as candidate anchors rather than complete conclusions.
- Boundary
- It belongs inside the apps/nrf52_node Container; collaboration beyond this path should be interpreted back to the Container or Sequence perspective in the software structure model.
- Relationship meaning
- ScopedGpsSuspend was put into the Component View because it offloads the architectural responsibilities of apps/nrf52_node to an inspectable entry, orchestration, adaptation, contract or shared object. Reuse signs and external collaboration signs are used to indicate whether it is more like a shared core, an external orchestrator, or a normal local object.
- Why it belongs to this layer
- It has a clear code anchor, but the current explanation target is not the source code details, but how to split the internal responsibilities of apps/nrf52_node, so it belongs to the C4 Component layer.
- Drill-down intention
- Drill down to the Code View or Component Diagram of the software structure model to view ScopedGpsSuspend's file anchors, direct collaboration, and whether there is a risk of change diffusion.
AppFacadeRuntime
Component · medium
AppFacadeRuntime is a class candidate component in apps/nrf52_node, and the evidence anchor is apps/nrf52_node/src/nrf52_node_app_facade_runtime.h#L42; the current warehouse evidence shows that it has signs of partial relationships and is suitable as a candidate anchor rather than a complete conclusion.
- Responsibility
- AppFacadeRuntime is considered a candidate architectural component in the current C4 Component View. This judgment is not determined by the name alone, but is jointly supported by apps/nrf52_node/src/nrf52_node_app_facade_runtime.h#L42, class type and local relationship signs, which are suitable as candidate anchors rather than complete conclusions.
- Boundary
- It belongs inside the apps/nrf52_node Container; collaboration beyond this path should be interpreted back to the Container or Sequence perspective in the software structure model.
- Relationship meaning
- AppFacadeRuntime was put into Component View because it offloads the architectural responsibilities of apps/nrf52_node to an inspectable entry, orchestration, adaptation, contract or shared object. Reuse signs and external collaboration signs are used to indicate whether it is more like a shared core, an external orchestrator, or a normal local object.
- Why it belongs to this layer
- It has a clear code anchor, but the current explanation target is not the source code details, but how to split the internal responsibilities of apps/nrf52_node, so it belongs to the C4 Component layer.
- Drill-down intention
- Drill down to the Component Diagram of the Code View or software structure model to view the file anchors of AppFacadeRuntime, direct collaboration, and whether there is a risk of change diffusion.
ChatModel
Component · medium
ChatModel is a class candidate component in apps/nrf52_node, and the evidence anchor is apps/nrf52_node/src/nrf52_node_app_facade_runtime.h#L22; the current warehouse evidence shows that it has signs of partial relationships and is suitable as a candidate anchor rather than a complete conclusion.
- Responsibility
- ChatModel is considered a candidate architectural component in the current C4 Component View. This judgment is not determined by the name alone, but is jointly supported by apps/nrf52_node/src/nrf52_node_app_facade_runtime.h#L22, class type and local relationship signs, which are suitable as candidate anchors rather than complete conclusions.
- Boundary
- It belongs inside the apps/nrf52_node Container; collaboration beyond this path should be interpreted back to the Container or Sequence perspective in the software structure model.
- Relationship meaning
- ChatModel is put into Component View because it offloads the architectural responsibilities of apps/nrf52_node to an inspectable entry, orchestration, adaptation, contract or shared object. Reuse signs and external collaboration signs are used to indicate whether it is more like a shared core, an external orchestrator, or a normal local object.
- Why it belongs to this layer
- It has a clear code anchor, but the current explanation target is not the source code details, but how to split the internal responsibilities of apps/nrf52_node, so it belongs to the C4 Component layer.
- Drill-down intention
- Drill down to the Code View or the Component Diagram of the software structure model to view the ChatModel's file anchors, direct collaboration, and whether there is a risk of change diffusion.
SelfIdentityBridge
Component · medium
SelfIdentityBridge is a class candidate component in apps/nrf52_node, and the evidence anchor is apps/nrf52_node/src/nrf52_node_app_facade_runtime.h#L36; the current warehouse evidence shows that it has signs of partial relationships and is suitable as a candidate anchor rather than a complete conclusion.
- Responsibility
- SelfIdentityBridge is considered a candidate schema component in the current C4 Component View. This judgment is not determined by the name alone, but is jointly supported by apps/nrf52_node/src/nrf52_node_app_facade_runtime.h#L36, class type and local relationship signs, which are suitable as candidate anchors rather than complete conclusions.
- Boundary
- It belongs inside the apps/nrf52_node Container; collaboration beyond this path should be interpreted back to the Container or Sequence perspective in the software structure model.
- Relationship meaning
- SelfIdentityBridge was put into Component View because it offloads the architectural responsibilities of apps/nrf52_node to an inspectable entry, orchestration, adapter, contract, or shared object. Reuse signs and external collaboration signs are used to indicate whether it is more like a shared core, an external orchestrator, or a normal local object.
- Why it belongs to this layer
- It has a clear code anchor, but the current explanation target is not the source code details, but how to split the internal responsibilities of apps/nrf52_node, so it belongs to the C4 Component layer.
- Drill-down intention
- Drill down to the Code View or Component Diagram of the software structure model to view SelfIdentityBridge's file anchors, direct collaboration, and whether there is a risk of change propagation.
IChatStore
Component · medium
IChatStore is a class candidate component in apps/nrf52_node, and the evidence anchor is apps/nrf52_node/src/nrf52_node_app_facade_runtime.h#L24; the current warehouse evidence shows that it has signs of partial relationships and is suitable as a candidate anchor rather than a complete conclusion.
- Responsibility
- IChatStore is considered a candidate architectural component in the current C4 Component View. This judgment is not determined by the name alone, but is jointly supported by apps/nrf52_node/src/nrf52_node_app_facade_runtime.h#L24, class type and local relationship signs, which are suitable as candidate anchors rather than complete conclusions.
- Boundary
- It belongs inside the apps/nrf52_node Container; collaboration beyond this path should be interpreted back to the Container or Sequence perspective in the software structure model.
- Relationship meaning
- IChatStore was put into Component View because it offloads the architectural responsibilities of apps/nrf52_node to an inspectable entry, orchestration, adaptation, contract or shared object. Reuse signs and external collaboration signs are used to indicate whether it is more like a shared core, an external orchestrator, or a normal local object.
- Why it belongs to this layer
- It has a clear code anchor, but the current explanation target is not the source code details, but how to split the internal responsibilities of apps/nrf52_node, so it belongs to the C4 Component layer.
- Drill-down intention
- Drill down to the Component Diagram of the Code View or software structure model to view the file anchor points of IChatStore, direct collaboration, and whether there is a risk of change diffusion.
IContactStore
Component · medium
IContactStore is a class candidate component in apps/nrf52_node, and the evidence anchor is apps/nrf52_node/src/nrf52_node_app_facade_runtime.h#L29; the current warehouse evidence shows that it has signs of partial relationships and is suitable as a candidate anchor rather than a complete conclusion.
- Responsibility
- IContactStore is considered a candidate architectural component in the current C4 Component View. This judgment is not determined by the name alone, but is jointly supported by apps/nrf52_node/src/nrf52_node_app_facade_runtime.h#L29, class type and local relationship signs, which are suitable as candidate anchors rather than complete conclusions.
- Boundary
- It belongs inside the apps/nrf52_node Container; collaboration beyond this path should be interpreted back to the Container or Sequence perspective in the software structure model.
- Relationship meaning
- IContactStore was put into the Component View because it offloads the architectural responsibilities of apps/nrf52_node onto an inspectable entry, orchestration, adapter, contract or shared object. Reuse signs and external collaboration signs are used to indicate whether it is more like a shared core, an external orchestrator, or a normal local object.
- Why it belongs to this layer
- It has a clear code anchor, but the current explanation target is not the source code details, but how to split the internal responsibilities of apps/nrf52_node, so it belongs to the C4 Component layer.
- Drill-down intention
- Drill down to the Component Diagram of the Code View or software structure model to view IContactStore's file anchors, direct collaboration, and whether there is a risk of change diffusion.
INodeStore
Component · medium
INodeStore is a class candidate component in apps/nrf52_node, and the evidence anchor is apps/nrf52_node/src/nrf52_node_app_facade_runtime.h#L28; the current warehouse evidence shows that it has signs of partial relationships and is suitable as a candidate anchor rather than a complete conclusion.
- Responsibility
- INodeStore is considered a candidate architectural component in the current C4 Component View. This judgment is not determined by the name alone, but is jointly supported by apps/nrf52_node/src/nrf52_node_app_facade_runtime.h#L28, class type and local relationship signs, which are suitable as candidate anchors rather than complete conclusions.
- Boundary
- It belongs inside the apps/nrf52_node Container; collaboration beyond this path should be interpreted back to the Container or Sequence perspective in the software structure model.
- Relationship meaning
- INodeStore is put into Component View because it can offload the architectural responsibilities of apps/nrf52_node to an inspectable entry, orchestration, adaptation, contract or shared object. Reuse signs and external collaboration signs are used to indicate whether it is more like a shared core, an external orchestrator, or a normal local object.
- Why it belongs to this layer
- It has a clear code anchor, but the current explanation target is not the source code details, but how to split the internal responsibilities of apps/nrf52_node, so it belongs to the C4 Component layer.
- Drill-down intention
- Drill down to the Component Diagram of the Code View or software structure model to view the file anchor points of INodeStore, direct collaboration, and whether there is a risk of change diffusion.
nrf52_node_app_facade_runtime
Component · high
nrf52_node_app_facade_runtime is an import candidate component in apps/nrf52_node, and the evidence anchor is apps/nrf52_node/src/nrf52_node_app_facade_runtime.cpp; the current warehouse evidence shows that it has signs of partial relationships and is suitable as a candidate anchor rather than a complete conclusion.
- Responsibility
- nrf52_node_app_facade_runtime is considered a candidate architecture component in the current C4 Component View. This judgment is not determined by the name alone, but is jointly supported by apps/nrf52_node/src/nrf52_node_app_facade_runtime.cpp, import type, and partial relationship signs, which are suitable as candidate anchors rather than complete conclusions.
- Boundary
- It belongs inside the apps/nrf52_node Container; collaboration beyond this path should be interpreted back to the Container or Sequence perspective in the software structure model.
- Relationship meaning
- nrf52_node_app_facade_runtime is placed in the Component View because it offloads the architectural responsibilities of apps/nrf52_node to an inspectable entry, orchestration, adaptation, contract or shared object. Reuse signs and external collaboration signs are used to indicate whether it is more like a shared core, an external orchestrator, or a normal local object.
- Why it belongs to this layer
- It has a clear code anchor, but the current explanation target is not the source code details, but how to split the internal responsibilities of apps/nrf52_node, so it belongs to the C4 Component layer.
- Drill-down intention
- Drill down to the Component Diagram of the Code View or software structure model to view the file anchors of nrf52_node_app_facade_runtime, direct collaboration, and whether there is a risk of change diffusion.
nrf52_node_runtime_config
Component · medium
nrf52_node_runtime_config is an import candidate component in apps/nrf52_node, and the evidence anchor is apps/nrf52_node/src/nrf52_node_runtime_config.cpp; the current warehouse evidence shows that it has signs of partial relationships and is suitable as a candidate anchor rather than a complete conclusion.
- Responsibility
- nrf52_node_runtime_config is considered a candidate architecture component in the current C4 Component View. This judgment is not determined by the name alone, but is jointly supported by apps/nrf52_node/src/nrf52_node_runtime_config.cpp, import type, and partial relationship signs, which are suitable as candidate anchors rather than complete conclusions.
- Boundary
- It belongs inside the apps/nrf52_node Container; collaboration beyond this path should be interpreted back to the Container or Sequence perspective in the software structure model.
- Relationship meaning
- nrf52_node_runtime_config is placed in the Component View because it offloads the architectural responsibilities of apps/nrf52_node to an inspectable entry, orchestration, adaptation, contract or shared object. Reuse signs and external collaboration signs are used to indicate whether it is more like a shared core, an external orchestrator, or a normal local object.
- Why it belongs to this layer
- It has a clear code anchor, but the current explanation target is not the source code details, but how to split the internal responsibilities of apps/nrf52_node, so it belongs to the C4 Component layer.
- Drill-down intention
- Drill down to the Component Diagram of the Code View or software structure model to view the file anchor point of nrf52_node_runtime_config, direct collaboration, and whether there is a risk of change diffusion.