mirror of
https://github.com/vicliu624/trail-mate.git
synced 2026-10-23 21:43:28 +00:00
71 lines
202 KiB
HTML
71 lines
202 KiB
HTML
<!doctype html>
|
|
<html lang="en">
|
|
<head>
|
|
<meta charset="utf-8" />
|
|
<title>Class / Structural Diagrams</title>
|
|
</head>
|
|
<body>
|
|
<main class="praxis-engineering-map" data-praxis-anchor="engineering:category:class_structural" data-praxis-kind="engineering_category_map" data-praxis-status="candidate" data-praxis-confidence="high">
|
|
<header class="praxis-design-map-header">
|
|
<p>Praxis Software Structure Model</p>
|
|
<h1>Class / Structural Diagrams</h1>
|
|
<p> Structural collaboration slicing restored based on business/technical context, not based on top-level layers or number of relationships.</p>
|
|
</header>
|
|
<section class="semantic-layer engineering-category-items" data-praxis-anchor="engineering:category-items" data-praxis-kind="engineering_category_items">
|
|
<div class="layer-grid">
|
|
<article class="layer-card document-entry-card" role="link" tabindex="0" data-praxis-anchor="engineering:class-structural:boards-gat562_mesh_evb_pro-include-boards" data-praxis-kind="engineering_class_structural_diagram" data-praxis-status="candidate" data-praxis-confidence="high" data-praxis-document-title="Structural collaboration: structural slicing boards · gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards" data-praxis-document-summary="Open structural collaboration: structural slicing boards · gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards, check whether the classes, interfaces and value objects in boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards jointly explain a business capability, shared support mechanism or adaptation boundary; if the common context cannot be explained, this diagram should be split or downgraded. You can continue to drill down to 1 Technical Hotspot." data-praxis-document-md="docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams/boards-gat562_mesh_evb_pro-include-boards/class-structural-diagram.md" data-praxis-document-html="docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams/boards-gat562_mesh_evb_pro-include-boards/class-structural-diagram.html" data-praxis-drilldowns="{"id":"engineering:diagram:technical-hotspot:dependency-cluster--boards","kind":"technical_hotspot","title":"Dependency cluster: boards technology hotspots","summary":"This module relies on multiple external boundaries and is currently processed as a candidate technology coupling center; only the dependency directions and boundaries that have been observed by warehouse evidence are retained in the figure.","docPath":"docs/engineering/technical-hotspots/dependency-cluster--boards/technical-hotspot.md","htmlPath":"docs/engineering/technical-hotspots/dependency-cluster--boards/technical-hotspot.html","anchor":"engineering:hotspot:dependency-cluster:boards","relation":"risk_detail","reason":"Look at hot spots within the boundaries of the structure to identify which objects, files, or relationship clusters the complexity is concentrated on."}">
|
|
<h3>Structural collaboration: structural slicing boards · gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards</h3>
|
|
<p>high · Class / Structural Diagram</p>
|
|
<p>Open structural collaboration: structural slicing boards · gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards, check whether the classes, interfaces and value objects in boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards jointly explain a business capability, shared support mechanism or adaptation boundary; if the common context cannot be explained, this diagram should be split or downgraded. You can continue to drill down to 1 Technical Hotspot.</p>
|
|
</article>
|
|
<article class="layer-card document-entry-card" role="link" tabindex="0" data-praxis-anchor="engineering:class-structural:boards-t_echo_lite-include-boards" data-praxis-kind="engineering_class_structural_diagram" data-praxis-status="candidate" data-praxis-confidence="high" data-praxis-document-title="Structural collaboration: structural slice boards · t_echo_lite/include/boards" data-praxis-document-summary="Open structural collaboration: structural slicing boards · t_echo_lite/include/boards, check whether the classes, interfaces and value objects in boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards jointly explain a business capability, shared support mechanism or adaptation boundary; if the common context cannot be explained, this diagram should be split or downgraded. You can continue to drill down to 2 Component Diagrams and 1 Technical Hotspot." data-praxis-document-md="docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams/boards-t_echo_lite-include-boards/class-structural-diagram.md" data-praxis-document-html="docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams/boards-t_echo_lite-include-boards/class-structural-diagram.html" data-praxis-drilldowns="[{"id":"engineering:diagram:component:boards-makeboardprofile","kind":"component","title":"Function node: makeBoardProfile","summary":"function is located at boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/board_profile.h#L188, coordinates multiple external objects or capabilities, and is used to explain technical collaboration and change impact areas.","docPath":"docs/engineering/component-diagrams/boards-makeboardprofile/component-diagram.md","htmlPath":"docs/engineering/component-diagrams/boards-makeboardprofile/component-diagram.html","anchor":"engineering:component:function:makeboardprofile:boards-t_echo_lite-include-boards-t_echo_lite-board_profile.h:188","relation":"realized_by","reason":"Open the component perspective of the function node: makeBoardProfile to verify whether the object role in the structure diagram is supported by the file anchor boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/board_profile.h, the referenced/called relationship and the downstream relationship evidence."},{"id":"engineering:diagram:component:boards-pinnum","kind":"component","title":"Function node: pinNum","summary":"The function is located in boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/board_profile.h#L8. It is reused or relied on by multiple objects and is used to explain technical collaboration and change impact.","docPath":"docs/engineering/component-diagrams/boards-pinnum/component-diagram.md","htmlPath":"docs/engineering/component-diagrams/boards-pinnum/component-diagram.html","anchor":"engineering:component:function:pinnum:boards-t_echo_lite-include-boards-t_echo_lite-board_profile.h:8","relation":"realized_by","reason":"Open the component perspective of function node: pinNum to verify whether the object role in the structure diagram is supported by the file anchor boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/board_profile.h, the referenced/called relationship and the downstream relationship evidence."},{"id":"engineering:diagram:technical-hotspot:dependency-cluster--boards","kind":"technical_hotspot","title":"Dependency cluster: boards technology hotspots","summary":"This module relies on multiple external boundaries and is currently processed as a candidate technology coupling center; only the dependency directions and boundaries that have been observed by warehouse evidence are retained in the figure.","docPath":"docs/engineering/technical-hotspots/dependency-cluster--boards/technical-hotspot.md","htmlPath":"docs/engineering/technical-hotspots/dependency-cluster--boards/technical-hotspot.html","anchor":"engineering:hotspot:dependency-cluster:boards","relation":"risk_detail","reason":"Look at hot spots within the boundaries of the structure to identify which objects, files, or relationship clusters the complexity is concentrated on."}]">
|
|
<h3>Structural collaboration: structural slice boards · t_echo_lite/include/boards</h3>
|
|
<p>high · Class / Structural Diagram</p>
|
|
<p>Open structural collaboration: structural slicing boards · t_echo_lite/include/boards, check whether the classes, interfaces and value objects in boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards jointly explain a business capability, shared support mechanism or adaptation boundary; if the common context cannot be explained, this diagram should be split or downgraded. You can continue to drill down to 2 Component Diagrams and 1 Technical Hotspot.</p>
|
|
</article>
|
|
<article class="layer-card document-entry-card" role="link" tabindex="0" data-praxis-anchor="engineering:class-structural:boards-tab5-include-boards" data-praxis-kind="engineering_class_structural_diagram" data-praxis-status="candidate" data-praxis-confidence="high" data-praxis-document-title="Structural collaboration: structural slice boards · tab5/include/boards" data-praxis-document-summary="Open structural collaboration: structural slice boards · tab5/include/boards, check whether the classes, interfaces and value objects in boards/tab5/include/boards jointly explain a business capability, shared support mechanism or adaptation boundary; if the common context cannot be explained, this diagram should be split or downgraded. You can continue to drill down to 1 Technical Hotspot." data-praxis-document-md="docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams/boards-tab5-include-boards/class-structural-diagram.md" data-praxis-document-html="docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams/boards-tab5-include-boards/class-structural-diagram.html" data-praxis-drilldowns="{"id":"engineering:diagram:technical-hotspot:dependency-cluster--boards","kind":"technical_hotspot","title":"Dependency cluster: boards technology hotspots","summary":"This module relies on multiple external boundaries and is currently processed as a candidate technology coupling center; only the dependency directions and boundaries that have been observed by warehouse evidence are retained in the figure.","docPath":"docs/engineering/technical-hotspots/dependency-cluster--boards/technical-hotspot.md","htmlPath":"docs/engineering/technical-hotspots/dependency-cluster--boards/technical-hotspot.html","anchor":"engineering:hotspot:dependency-cluster:boards","relation":"risk_detail","reason":"Look at hot spots within the boundaries of the structure to identify which objects, files, or relationship clusters the complexity is concentrated on."}">
|
|
<h3>Structural collaboration: structural slicing boards · tab5/include/boards</h3>
|
|
<p>high · Class / Structural Diagram</p>
|
|
<p>Open structural collaboration: structural slice boards · tab5/include/boards, check whether the classes, interfaces and value objects in boards/tab5/include/boards jointly explain a business capability, shared support mechanism or adaptation boundary; if the common context cannot be explained, this diagram should be split or downgraded. You can continue to drill down to 1 Technical Hotspot.</p>
|
|
</article>
|
|
<article class="layer-card document-entry-card" role="link" tabindex="0" data-praxis-anchor="engineering:class-structural:boards-t_display_p4-include-boards" data-praxis-kind="engineering_class_structural_diagram" data-praxis-status="candidate" data-praxis-confidence="high" data-praxis-document-title="Structural collaboration: Structural slicing boards · t_display_p4/include/boards" data-praxis-document-summary="Open Structural collaboration: Structural slicing boards · t_display_p4/include/boards, check whether the classes, interfaces and value objects in boards/t_display_p4/include/boards jointly explain a business capability, shared support mechanism or adaptation boundary; if the common context cannot be explained, this diagram should be split or downgraded. You can continue to drill down to 1 Technical Hotspot." data-praxis-document-md="docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams/boards-t_display_p4-include-boards/class-structural-diagram.md" data-praxis-document-html="docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams/boards-t_display_p4-include-boards/class-structural-diagram.html" data-praxis-drilldowns="{"id":"engineering:diagram:technical-hotspot:dependency-cluster--boards","kind":"technical_hotspot","title":"Dependency cluster: boards technology hotspots","summary":"This module relies on multiple external boundaries and is currently processed as a candidate technology coupling center; only the dependency directions and boundaries that have been observed by warehouse evidence are retained in the figure.","docPath":"docs/engineering/technical-hotspots/dependency-cluster--boards/technical-hotspot.md","htmlPath":"docs/engineering/technical-hotspots/dependency-cluster--boards/technical-hotspot.html","anchor":"engineering:hotspot:dependency-cluster:boards","relation":"risk_detail","reason":"Look at hot spots within the boundaries of the structure to identify which objects, files, or relationship clusters the complexity is concentrated on."}">
|
|
<h3>Structure collaboration: structure slicing boards · t_display_p4/include/boards</h3>
|
|
<p>high · Class / Structural Diagram</p>
|
|
<p>Open structure collaboration: structure slicing boards · t_display_p4/include/boards, view boards/t_display_p4/include/boards Whether the classes, interfaces and value objects jointly explain a business capability, shared support mechanism or adaptation boundary; if they cannot explain the common context, this diagram should be split or downgraded. You can continue to drill down to 1 Technical Hotspot.</p>
|
|
</article>
|
|
<article class="layer-card document-entry-card" role="link" tabindex="0" data-praxis-anchor="engineering:class-structural:boards-tlora_pager-include-boards" data-praxis-kind="engineering_class_structural_diagram" data-praxis-status="candidate" data-praxis-confidence="high" data-praxis-document-title="Structural collaboration: structural slicing boards · tlora_pager/include/boards" data-praxis-document-summary="Open structural collaboration: structural slicing boards · tlora_pager/include/boards, check whether the classes, interfaces and value objects in boards/tlora_pager/include/boards jointly explain a business capability, shared support mechanism or adaptation boundary; if the common context cannot be explained, this diagram should be split or downgraded. You can continue to drill down to 1 Technical Hotspot." data-praxis-document-md="docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams/boards-tlora_pager-include-boards/class-structural-diagram.md" data-praxis-document-html="docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams/boards-tlora_pager-include-boards/class-structural-diagram.html" data-praxis-drilldowns="{"id":"engineering:diagram:technical-hotspot:dependency-cluster--boards","kind":"technical_hotspot","title":"Dependency cluster: boards technology hotspots","summary":"This module relies on multiple external boundaries and is currently processed as a candidate technology coupling center; only the dependency directions and boundaries that have been observed by warehouse evidence are retained in the figure.","docPath":"docs/engineering/technical-hotspots/dependency-cluster--boards/technical-hotspot.md","htmlPath":"docs/engineering/technical-hotspots/dependency-cluster--boards/technical-hotspot.html","anchor":"engineering:hotspot:dependency-cluster:boards","relation":"risk_detail","reason":"Look at hot spots within the boundaries of the structure to identify which objects, files, or relationship clusters the complexity is concentrated on."}">
|
|
<h3>Structural collaboration: structural slicing boards · tlora_pager/include/boards</h3>
|
|
<p>high · Class / Structural Diagram</p>
|
|
<p>Open structural collaboration: structural slicing boards · tlora_pager/include/boards, check whether the classes, interfaces and value objects in boards/tlora_pager/include/boards jointly explain a business capability, shared support mechanism or adaptation boundary; if the common context cannot be explained, this diagram should be split or downgraded. You can continue to drill down to 1 Technical Hotspot.</p>
|
|
</article>
|
|
<article class="layer-card document-entry-card" role="link" tabindex="0" data-praxis-anchor="engineering:class-structural:boards-tdeck-include-boards" data-praxis-kind="engineering_class_structural_diagram" data-praxis-status="candidate" data-praxis-confidence="high" data-praxis-document-title="Structural collaboration: structural slice boards · tdeck/include/boards" data-praxis-document-summary="Open structural collaboration: structural slice boards · tdeck/include/boards, check whether the classes, interfaces and value objects in boards/tdeck/include/boards jointly explain a business capability, shared support mechanism or adaptation boundary; if the common context cannot be explained, this diagram should be split or downgraded. You can continue to drill down to 1 Technical Hotspot." data-praxis-document-md="docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams/boards-tdeck-include-boards/class-structural-diagram.md" data-praxis-document-html="docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams/boards-tdeck-include-boards/class-structural-diagram.html" data-praxis-drilldowns="{"id":"engineering:diagram:technical-hotspot:dependency-cluster--boards","kind":"technical_hotspot","title":"Dependency cluster: boards technology hotspots","summary":"This module relies on multiple external boundaries and is currently processed as a candidate technology coupling center; only the dependency directions and boundaries that have been observed by warehouse evidence are retained in the figure.","docPath":"docs/engineering/technical-hotspots/dependency-cluster--boards/technical-hotspot.md","htmlPath":"docs/engineering/technical-hotspots/dependency-cluster--boards/technical-hotspot.html","anchor":"engineering:hotspot:dependency-cluster:boards","relation":"risk_detail","reason":"Look at hot spots within the boundaries of the structure to identify which objects, files, or relationship clusters the complexity is concentrated on."}">
|
|
<h3>Structural collaboration: structural slicing boards · tdeck/include/boards</h3>
|
|
<p>high · Class / Structural Diagram</p>
|
|
<p>Open structural collaboration: structural slice boards · tdeck/include/boards, check whether the classes, interfaces and value objects in boards/tdeck/include/boards jointly explain a business capability, shared support mechanism or adaptation boundary; if the common context cannot be explained, this diagram should be split or downgraded. You can continue to drill down to 1 Technical Hotspot.</p>
|
|
</article>
|
|
<article class="layer-card document-entry-card" role="link" tabindex="0" data-praxis-anchor="engineering:class-structural:boards-tdeck_pro-include-boards" data-praxis-kind="engineering_class_structural_diagram" data-praxis-status="candidate" data-praxis-confidence="high" data-praxis-document-title="Structural collaboration: structural slicing boards · tdeck_pro/include/boards" data-praxis-document-summary="Open structural collaboration: structural slicing boards · tdeck_pro/include/boards and check whether the classes, interfaces and value objects in boards/tdeck_pro/include/boards jointly explain a business capability, shared support mechanism or adaptation boundary; if the common context cannot be explained, this diagram should be split or downgraded. You can continue to drill down to 1 Technical Hotspot." data-praxis-document-md="docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams/boards-tdeck_pro-include-boards/class-structural-diagram.md" data-praxis-document-html="docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams/boards-tdeck_pro-include-boards/class-structural-diagram.html" data-praxis-drilldowns="{"id":"engineering:diagram:technical-hotspot:dependency-cluster--boards","kind":"technical_hotspot","title":"Dependency cluster: boards technology hotspots","summary":"This module relies on multiple external boundaries and is currently processed as a candidate technology coupling center; only the dependency directions and boundaries that have been observed by warehouse evidence are retained in the figure.","docPath":"docs/engineering/technical-hotspots/dependency-cluster--boards/technical-hotspot.md","htmlPath":"docs/engineering/technical-hotspots/dependency-cluster--boards/technical-hotspot.html","anchor":"engineering:hotspot:dependency-cluster:boards","relation":"risk_detail","reason":"Look at hot spots within the boundaries of the structure to identify which objects, files, or relationship clusters the complexity is concentrated on."}">
|
|
<h3>Structural collaboration: structural slice boards · tdeck_pro/include/boards</h3>
|
|
<p>high · Class / Structural Diagram</p>
|
|
<p>Open structural collaboration: structural slice boards · tdeck_pro/include/boards, check whether the classes, interfaces and value objects in boards/tdeck_pro/include/boards jointly explain a business capability, shared support mechanism or adaptation boundary; if the common context cannot be explained, this diagram should be split or downgraded. You can continue to drill down to 1 Technical Hotspot.</p>
|
|
</article>
|
|
<article class="layer-card document-entry-card" role="link" tabindex="0" data-praxis-anchor="engineering:class-structural:boards-twatchs3-include-boards" data-praxis-kind="engineering_class_structural_diagram" data-praxis-status="candidate" data-praxis-confidence="high" data-praxis-document-title="Structural collaboration: structural slicing boards · twatchs3/include/boards" data-praxis-document-summary="Open structural collaboration: structural slicing boards · twatchs3/include/boards, check whether the classes, interfaces and value objects in boards/twatchs3/include/boards jointly explain a business capability, shared support mechanism or adaptation boundary; if the common context cannot be explained, this diagram should be split or downgraded. You can continue to drill down to 1 Technical Hotspot." data-praxis-document-md="docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams/boards-twatchs3-include-boards/class-structural-diagram.md" data-praxis-document-html="docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams/boards-twatchs3-include-boards/class-structural-diagram.html" data-praxis-drilldowns="{"id":"engineering:diagram:technical-hotspot:dependency-cluster--boards","kind":"technical_hotspot","title":"Dependency cluster: boards technology hotspots","summary":"This module relies on multiple external boundaries and is currently processed as a candidate technology coupling center; only the dependency directions and boundaries that have been observed by warehouse evidence are retained in the figure.","docPath":"docs/engineering/technical-hotspots/dependency-cluster--boards/technical-hotspot.md","htmlPath":"docs/engineering/technical-hotspots/dependency-cluster--boards/technical-hotspot.html","anchor":"engineering:hotspot:dependency-cluster:boards","relation":"risk_detail","reason":"Look at hot spots within the boundaries of the structure to identify which objects, files, or relationship clusters the complexity is concentrated on."}">
|
|
<h3>Structural collaboration: structural slicing boards · twatchs3/include/boards</h3>
|
|
<p>high · Class / Structural Diagram</p>
|
|
<p>Open structural collaboration: structural slicing boards · twatchs3/include/boards, check whether the classes, interfaces and value objects in boards/twatchs3/include/boards jointly explain a business capability, shared support mechanism or adaptation boundary; if the common context cannot be explained, this diagram should be split or downgraded. You can continue to drill down to 1 Technical Hotspot.</p>
|
|
</article>
|
|
<article class="layer-card document-entry-card" role="link" tabindex="0" data-praxis-anchor="engineering:class-structural:boards-gat562_mesh_evb_pro" data-praxis-kind="engineering_class_structural_diagram" data-praxis-status="candidate" data-praxis-confidence="high" data-praxis-document-title="Structure collaboration: structure slicing gat562_mesh_evb_pro · gat562_mesh_evb_pro" data-praxis-document-summary="Open structure collaboration: structure slicing gat562_mesh_evb_pro · gat562_mesh_evb_pro, view boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro Whether the classes, interfaces and value objects jointly explain a business capability, shared support mechanism or adaptation boundary; if they cannot explain the common context, this diagram should be split or downgraded. You can continue to drill down to 1 Technical Hotspot." data-praxis-document-md="docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams/boards-gat562_mesh_evb_pro/class-structural-diagram.md" data-praxis-document-html="docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams/boards-gat562_mesh_evb_pro/class-structural-diagram.html" data-praxis-drilldowns="{"id":"engineering:diagram:technical-hotspot:dependency-cluster--boards","kind":"technical_hotspot","title":"Dependency cluster: boards technology hotspots","summary":"This module relies on multiple external boundaries and is currently processed as a candidate technology coupling center; only the dependency directions and boundaries that have been observed by warehouse evidence are retained in the figure.","docPath":"docs/engineering/technical-hotspots/dependency-cluster--boards/technical-hotspot.md","htmlPath":"docs/engineering/technical-hotspots/dependency-cluster--boards/technical-hotspot.html","anchor":"engineering:hotspot:dependency-cluster:boards","relation":"risk_detail","reason":"Look at hot spots within the boundaries of the structure to identify which objects, files, or relationship clusters the complexity is concentrated on."}">
|
|
<h3>Structure collaboration: structure slicing gat562_mesh_evb_pro · gat562_mesh_evb_pro</h3>
|
|
<p>high · Class / Structural Diagram</p>
|
|
<p>Open structure collaboration: structure slicing gat562_mesh_evb_pro · gat562_mesh_evb_pro, view boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro Whether the classes, interfaces and value objects jointly explain a business capability, shared support mechanism or adaptation boundary; if they cannot explain the common context, this diagram should be split or downgraded. You can continue to drill down to 1 Technical Hotspot.</p>
|
|
</article>
|
|
<article class="layer-card document-entry-card" role="link" tabindex="0" data-praxis-anchor="engineering:class-structural:boards-t_echo_lite" data-praxis-kind="engineering_class_structural_diagram" data-praxis-status="candidate" data-praxis-confidence="high" data-praxis-document-title="Structure collaboration: Structural slice t_echo_lite · t_echo_lite" data-praxis-document-summary="Open Structural collaboration: Structural slice t_echo_lite · t_echo_lite, check whether the classes, interfaces and value objects in boards/t_echo_lite jointly explain a business capability, shared support mechanism or adaptation boundary; if the common context cannot be explained, this diagram should be split or downgraded. You can continue to drill down to 2 Component Diagrams and 1 Technical Hotspot." data-praxis-document-md="docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams/boards-t_echo_lite/class-structural-diagram.md" data-praxis-document-html="docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams/boards-t_echo_lite/class-structural-diagram.html" data-praxis-drilldowns="[{"id":"engineering:diagram:component:boards-makeboardprofile","kind":"component","title":"Function node: makeBoardProfile","summary":"function is located at boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/board_profile.h#L188, coordinates multiple external objects or capabilities, and is used to explain technical collaboration and change impact areas.","docPath":"docs/engineering/component-diagrams/boards-makeboardprofile/component-diagram.md","htmlPath":"docs/engineering/component-diagrams/boards-makeboardprofile/component-diagram.html","anchor":"engineering:component:function:makeboardprofile:boards-t_echo_lite-include-boards-t_echo_lite-board_profile.h:188","relation":"realized_by","reason":"Open the component perspective of the function node: makeBoardProfile to verify whether the object role in the structure diagram is supported by the file anchor boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/board_profile.h, the referenced/called relationship and the downstream relationship evidence."},{"id":"engineering:diagram:component:boards-pinnum","kind":"component","title":"Function node: pinNum","summary":"The function is located in boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/board_profile.h#L8. It is reused or relied on by multiple objects and is used to explain technical collaboration and change impact.","docPath":"docs/engineering/component-diagrams/boards-pinnum/component-diagram.md","htmlPath":"docs/engineering/component-diagrams/boards-pinnum/component-diagram.html","anchor":"engineering:component:function:pinnum:boards-t_echo_lite-include-boards-t_echo_lite-board_profile.h:8","relation":"realized_by","reason":"Open the component perspective of function node: pinNum to verify whether the object role in the structure diagram is supported by the file anchor boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/board_profile.h, the referenced/called relationship and the downstream relationship evidence."},{"id":"engineering:diagram:technical-hotspot:dependency-cluster--boards","kind":"technical_hotspot","title":"Dependency cluster: boards technology hotspots","summary":"This module relies on multiple external boundaries and is currently processed as a candidate technology coupling center; only the dependency directions and boundaries that have been observed by warehouse evidence are retained in the figure.","docPath":"docs/engineering/technical-hotspots/dependency-cluster--boards/technical-hotspot.md","htmlPath":"docs/engineering/technical-hotspots/dependency-cluster--boards/technical-hotspot.html","anchor":"engineering:hotspot:dependency-cluster:boards","relation":"risk_detail","reason":"Look at hot spots within the boundaries of the structure to identify which objects, files, or relationship clusters the complexity is concentrated on."}]">
|
|
<h3>Structure collaboration: Structural slice t_echo_lite · t_echo_lite</h3>
|
|
<p>high · Class / Structural Diagram</p>
|
|
<p>Open Structural collaboration: Structural slice t_echo_lite · t_echo_lite, check whether the classes, interfaces and value objects in boards/t_echo_lite jointly explain a business capability, shared support mechanism or adaptation boundary; if the common context cannot be explained, this diagram should be split or downgraded. You can continue to drill down to 2 Component Diagrams and 1 Technical Hotspot.</p>
|
|
</article>
|
|
</div>
|
|
</section>
|
|
<script type="application/json" id="praxis-engineering-map-index">{"schemaVersion":"praxis.engineeringMapIndex.v1","generatedAt":"2026-06-25T09:19:20.669Z","projectVersion":"0.1.0","git":{"branch":"main","commit":"34aad0bffa2f6450192f655f248a94b6c3cbd767","shortCommit":"34aad0bffa2f","dirty":true},"rootDocPath":"docs/engineering/engineering-maps.md","rootHtmlPath":"docs/engineering/engineering-maps.html","compatibilityDocPath":"docs/engineering/technical-complexity-maps.md","compatibilityHtmlPath":"docs/engineering/technical-complexity-maps.html","summary":{"fileCount":11735,"nodeCount":15063,"edgeCount":12150,"packageCount":18,"componentCount":24,"runtimeFlowCount":18,"deploymentNodeCount":0,"hotspotCount":18},"hierarchy":[{"parentKind":"package","childKinds":["component","class_structural","sequence","deployment","technical_hotspot"],"rationale":"The Package Diagram is a top-level engineering boundary for technical complexity; it drills down to key components, structural collaborations, operational links, operational configurations, and complexity hotspots within that boundary."},{"parentKind":"class_structural","childKinds":["component","sequence","technical_hotspot"],"rationale":"Class / Structural Diagram explains structural collaboration in a nameable business/technical context; it can continue to drill down to specific components, dynamic interaction fragments and structural risks."},{"parentKind":"component","childKinds":["sequence","class_structural","technical_hotspot"],"rationale":"Component Diagram is the perspective of key technical objects; it can drill down to the call fragments in which the object participates, the structural slices where it is located, and related hot spots."},{"parentKind":"sequence","childKinds":["component","class_structural","technical_hotspot"],"rationale":"Sequence Diagram is a dynamic collaboration perspective; it can reversely locate participating components, structural boundaries and possible operational risks."},{"parentKind":"deployment","childKinds":["package","component","technical_hotspot"],"rationale":"Deployment Diagram is the perspective of running/building nodes; it can drill down to the corresponding packages, entry components and running configuration hotspots."},{"parentKind":"technical_hotspot","childKinds":["package","component","class_structural","sequence"],"rationale":"Technical Hotspot is the risk perspective; it requires linking back to the boundaries, components, structures, or call fragments that create complexity."}],"categories":[{"id":"engineering:category:class_structural","kind":"class_structural","title":"Class / Structural Diagrams","directory":"docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams","mapDocPath":"docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams/class-structural-diagrams-maps.md","mapHtmlPath":"docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams/class-structural-diagrams-maps.html","summary":" Structural collaboration slicing restored based on business/technical context, not based on top-level layers or number of relationships.","count":10,"items":[{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-gat562_mesh_evb_pro-include-boards","kind":"class_structural","title":"Structural collaboration: structural slicing boards · gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards","summary":"Explain how the classes, interfaces, components or value objects in the structural slice boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards share the structural responsibilities in the structural slice boards; candidates include Gat562Board, SX1262, Sx1262RadioPacketIo, Gat562Board::I2cGuard, GpsRuntime.","docPath":"docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams/boards-gat562_mesh_evb_pro-include-boards/class-structural-diagram.md","htmlPath":"docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams/boards-gat562_mesh_evb_pro-include-boards/class-structural-diagram.html","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-gat562_mesh_evb_pro-include-boards","status":"candidate","confidence":"high","mermaidKind":"classDiagram","mermaid":"classDiagram\n class Gat562Board[\"Gat562Board\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n class SX1262[\"SX1262\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n class Sx1262RadioPacketIo[\"Sx1262RadioPacketIo\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n class Gat562Board_I2cGuard[\"Gat562Board I2cGuard\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n class GpsRuntime[\"GpsRuntime\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n class InputRuntime[\"InputRuntime\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n class Module[\"Module\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n class TwoWire[\"TwoWire\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n class GpsRuntime_2[\"GpsRuntime\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n class InputRuntime_2[\"InputRuntime\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n class IRadioPacketIo[\"IRadioPacketIo\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n class MonoDisplay[\"MonoDisplay\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n Gat562Board --|> TwoWire : Inherit\n Gat562Board_I2cGuard --|> Gat562Board : Inherit","readingGuide":["This Class / Structural Diagram focuses on the structural slice boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards, rather than the entire top-level directory of boards.","It only puts classes, interfaces, enumerations or structural types; method-level high-reference objects will enter Component/Hotspot and will no longer be mixed into the structural collaboration diagram.","The candidate context is \"structural slice boards\". When reading the diagram, first confirm whether these objects jointly carry the same business capabilities, share support mechanisms or adaptation boundaries.","Two class-level relationships have been drawn in the figure, mainly from inheritance, interface implementation, creation or reference evidence."],"technicalAnalysis":["boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards currently contains 12 classes/structures and 0 interface/trait candidates.","Currently, 2 class-level structural relationships are observed.","The explanation goal of this diagram is to structure responsibilities and boundaries: which objects are like domain models, which objects are like interface contracts, and which objects are like strategies/adapters or shared supports.","If the objects in the diagram are in the same directory but have no common business context or structural relationship, the generation process must be split or downgraded to Component/Hotspot instead of continuing to remain as Class/Structural Diagram."],"businessRelation":["This diagram candidate is associated with \"structural slice boards\" and should be connected back to the Class Collaboration, Activity or Sequence drill-down diagram corresponding to the Use Case in the organization/process model.","The software structure model cannot just say \"there are many classes here\", but should explain how these classes make business changes easier or more difficult.","Candidates include: Gat562Board, SX1262, Sx1262RadioPacketIo, Gat562Board::I2cGuard, GpsRuntime, InputRuntime."],"governanceNotes":["Do not think of top-level layers, directory names, or relationship numbers as the interpretation of the structure diagram; the structure diagram must be centered around a nameable business/technical context.","When an object is out of the current context, has no relationship description, or is just a highly referenced utility class, it should be removed from the diagram and transferred to Component/Hotspot or shared support slice.","When changing boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards, simultaneously maintain the reference relationship between it and the related Use Case, Component, and Sequence."],"coverage":["Structure slice: boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards","Candidate business/technical context: structural slice boards","Project boundary: boards","Number of candidate structure objects: 12","Number of candidate structure relationships: 2","Object: Gat562Board (class)","Object: SX1262 (class)","Object: Sx1262RadioPacketIo (class)","Object: Gat562Board::I2cGuard (class)","Object: GpsRuntime (class)","Object: InputRuntime (class)","Object: Module (class)","Object: TwoWire (class)"],"evidencePaths":["boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/gat562_board.h#L62","boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/sx1262_radio_packet_io.h#L8","boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/sx1262_radio_packet_io.h#L13","boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/gat562_board.h#L65","boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/gps_runtime.h#L13","boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/input_runtime.h#L8","boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/sx1262_radio_packet_io.h#L7","boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/gat562_board.h#L13","boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/gat562_board.h#L28","boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/gat562_board.h#L29"],"questions":["This structural slice comes from local warehouse evidence; currently there is not enough Trace evidence found to bind it to the unique business story, so it is only used as a candidate perspective of the software structural model."],"scope":{"packageId":"boards","filePath":"boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards"},"drilldowns":[{"id":"engineering:diagram:technical-hotspot:dependency-cluster--boards","kind":"technical_hotspot","title":"Dependency cluster: boards technology hotspots","summary":"This module relies on multiple external boundaries and is currently processed as a candidate technology coupling center; only the dependency directions and boundaries that have been observed by warehouse evidence are retained in the figure.","docPath":"docs/engineering/technical-hotspots/dependency-cluster--boards/technical-hotspot.md","htmlPath":"docs/engineering/technical-hotspots/dependency-cluster--boards/technical-hotspot.html","anchor":"engineering:hotspot:dependency-cluster:boards","relation":"risk_detail","reason":"Look at hot spots within the boundaries of the structure to identify which objects, files, or relationship clusters the complexity is concentrated on."}],"elements":[{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-gat562_mesh_evb_pro-include-boards:element:gat562board","mermaidId":"Gat562Board","label":"Gat562Board","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-gat562_mesh_evb_pro-include-boards","summary":"Gat562Board belongs to the boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards structural slice, which is used to explain a structural responsibility in the \"structural slice boards\", rather than being put into the diagram because it has a high number of relationships in the boards.","role":"Structure object: Its responsibilities must be explained in combination with Use Case, Sequence or Component drill-down evidence, and cannot be judged solely by name or directory.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/gat562_board.h, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":"Drill down Gat562Board should verify the specific roles it plays in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to avoid isolated class names being misinterpreted as business explanations.","businessRelevance":"Gat562Board is a candidate technology carrier object for \"structural slicing boards\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its service through Trace/Refine links. If the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying Gat562Board may affect the structural description in boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/gat562_board.h#L62","Structure slice: boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards","Object type: class","Candidate context: structural slice boards"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-gat562_mesh_evb_pro-include-boards:element:sx1262","mermaidId":"SX1262","label":"SX1262","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-gat562_mesh_evb_pro-include-boards","summary":"SX1262 belongs to the boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards structural slice, which is used to explain a structural responsibility in the \"structural slice boards\", rather than being put into the diagram because it has a high number of relationships in the boards.","role":"Structure object: Its responsibilities must be explained in combination with Use Case, Sequence or Component drill-down evidence, and cannot be judged solely by name or directory.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/sx1262_radio_packet_io.h, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":"Drill-down SX1262 should verify the specific role it plays in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to avoid isolated class names being misinterpreted as business explanations.","businessRelevance":"SX1262 is a candidate technology carrier object for \"structural slicing boards\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its service through Trace/Refine links. If the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying SX1262 may affect the structural description in boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/sx1262_radio_packet_io.h#L8","Structure slice: boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards","Object type: class","Candidate context: structural slice boards"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-gat562_mesh_evb_pro-include-boards:element:sx1262radiopacketio","mermaidId":"Sx1262RadioPacketIo","label":"Sx1262RadioPacketIo","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-gat562_mesh_evb_pro-include-boards","summary":"Sx1262RadioPacketIo belongs to the boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards structural slice, which is used to explain a structural responsibility in the \"structural slice boards\", rather than being put into the diagram because it has a high number of relationships in the boards.","role":"Structure object: Its responsibilities must be explained in combination with Use Case, Sequence or Component drill-down evidence, and cannot be judged solely by name or directory.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/sx1262_radio_packet_io.h, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":"Drilling down Sx1262RadioPacketIo should verify the specific role it plays in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to avoid isolated class names being misinterpreted as business explanations.","businessRelevance":"Sx1262RadioPacketIo is a candidate technology carrier object for \"structural slicing boards\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its service through Trace/Refine links. If the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying Sx1262RadioPacketIo may affect the structure description in boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/sx1262_radio_packet_io.h#L13","Structure slice: boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards","Object type: class","Candidate context: structural slice boards"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-gat562_mesh_evb_pro-include-boards:element:gat562board::i2cguard","mermaidId":"Gat562Board_I2cGuard","label":"Gat562Board::I2cGuard","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-gat562_mesh_evb_pro-include-boards","summary":"Gat562Board::I2cGuard belongs to the boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards structural slice, which is used to explain a structural responsibility in the \"structural slice boards\", rather than being put into the diagram because it has a high number of relationships in the boards.","role":"Structure object: Its responsibilities must be explained in combination with Use Case, Sequence or Component drill-down evidence, and cannot be judged solely by name or directory.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/gat562_board.h, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":"Drill down Gat562Board::I2cGuard should verify the specific role it plays in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to avoid isolated class names being misinterpreted as business explanations.","businessRelevance":"Gat562Board::I2cGuard is a candidate technology carrier object for \"structural slicing boards\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its service through Trace/Refine links. If the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying Gat562Board::I2cGuard may affect the structure description in boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/gat562_board.h#L65","Structure slice: boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards","Object type: class","Candidate context: structural slice boards"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-gat562_mesh_evb_pro-include-boards:element:gpsruntime","mermaidId":"GpsRuntime","label":"GpsRuntime","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-gat562_mesh_evb_pro-include-boards","summary":"GpsRuntime belongs to the boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards structural slice, which is used to explain a structural responsibility in the \"structural slice boards\", rather than being put into the graph because it has a high number of relationships in the boards.","role":"Structure object: Its responsibilities must be explained in combination with Use Case, Sequence or Component drill-down evidence, and cannot be judged solely by name or directory.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/gps_runtime.h, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":"Drilling down to GpsRuntime should verify the specific roles it plays in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to avoid isolated class names being misinterpreted as business explanations.","businessRelevance":"GpsRuntime is a candidate technology carrier object for \"structural slicing boards\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its service through Trace/Refine links. If the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying GpsRuntime may affect the structural description in boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/gps_runtime.h#L13","Structure slice: boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards","Object type: class","Candidate context: structural slice boards"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-gat562_mesh_evb_pro-include-boards:element:inputruntime","mermaidId":"InputRuntime","label":"InputRuntime","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-gat562_mesh_evb_pro-include-boards","summary":"InputRuntime belongs to the boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards structural slice, which is used to explain a structural responsibility in the \"structural slice boards\", rather than being put into the diagram because it has a high number of relationships in the boards.","role":"Structure object: Its responsibilities must be explained in combination with Use Case, Sequence or Component drill-down evidence, and cannot be judged solely by name or directory.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/input_runtime.h, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":"Drill-down InputRuntime should verify the specific role it plays in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to avoid isolated class names being misinterpreted as business explanations.","businessRelevance":"InputRuntime is a candidate technology carrier object for \"structural slicing boards\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its service through Trace/Refine links. When the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying InputRuntime may affect the structural description in boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/input_runtime.h#L8","Structure slice: boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards","Object type: class","Candidate context: structural slice boards"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-gat562_mesh_evb_pro-include-boards:element:module","mermaidId":"Module","label":"Module","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-gat562_mesh_evb_pro-include-boards","summary":"Module belongs to the boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards structural slice, which is used to explain a structural responsibility in the \"structural slice boards\", rather than being put into the diagram because it has a high number of relationships in the boards.","role":"Structure object: Its responsibilities must be explained in combination with Use Case, Sequence or Component drill-down evidence, and cannot be judged solely by name or directory.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/sx1262_radio_packet_io.h, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":"Drill-down Module should verify its specific role in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to prevent isolated class names from being misinterpreted as business explanations.","businessRelevance":"Module is a candidate technology carrier object for \"structural slicing boards\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its service through Trace/Refine links. When the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying Module may affect the structural description in boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/sx1262_radio_packet_io.h#L7","Structure slice: boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards","Object type: class","Candidate context: structural slice boards"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-gat562_mesh_evb_pro-include-boards:element:twowire","mermaidId":"TwoWire","label":"TwoWire","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-gat562_mesh_evb_pro-include-boards","summary":"TwoWire belongs to the boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards structural slice, which is used to explain a structural responsibility in the \"structural slice boards\", rather than being put into the diagram because it has a high number of relationships in the boards.","role":"Structure object: Its responsibilities must be explained in combination with Use Case, Sequence or Component drill-down evidence, and cannot be judged solely by name or directory.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/gat562_board.h, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":"Drill-down TwoWire should verify the specific roles it plays in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to prevent isolated class names from being misinterpreted as business explanations.","businessRelevance":"TwoWire is a candidate technology carrier for \"structural slicing boards\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its service through Trace/Refine links. When the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying TwoWire may affect the structure description in boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/gat562_board.h#L13","Structure slice: boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards","Object type: class","Candidate context: structural slice boards"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-gat562_mesh_evb_pro-include-boards:element:gpsruntime","mermaidId":"GpsRuntime","label":"GpsRuntime","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-gat562_mesh_evb_pro-include-boards","summary":"GpsRuntime belongs to the boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards structural slice, which is used to explain a structural responsibility in the \"structural slice boards\", rather than being put into the graph because it has a high number of relationships in the boards.","role":"Structure object: Its responsibilities must be explained in combination with Use Case, Sequence or Component drill-down evidence, and cannot be judged solely by name or directory.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/gat562_board.h, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":"Drilling down to GpsRuntime should verify the specific roles it plays in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to avoid isolated class names being misinterpreted as business explanations.","businessRelevance":"GpsRuntime is a candidate technology carrier object for \"structural slicing boards\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its service through Trace/Refine links. If the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying GpsRuntime may affect the structural description in boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/gat562_board.h#L28","Structure slice: boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards","Object type: class","Candidate context: structural slice boards"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-gat562_mesh_evb_pro-include-boards:element:inputruntime","mermaidId":"InputRuntime","label":"InputRuntime","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-gat562_mesh_evb_pro-include-boards","summary":"InputRuntime belongs to the boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards structural slice, which is used to explain a structural responsibility in the \"structural slice boards\", rather than being put into the diagram because it has a high number of relationships in the boards.","role":"Structure object: Its responsibilities must be explained in combination with Use Case, Sequence or Component drill-down evidence, and cannot be judged solely by name or directory.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/gat562_board.h, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":"Drill-down InputRuntime should verify the specific role it plays in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to avoid isolated class names being misinterpreted as business explanations.","businessRelevance":"InputRuntime is a candidate technology carrier object for \"structural slicing boards\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its service through Trace/Refine links. When the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying InputRuntime may affect the structural description in boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/gat562_board.h#L29","Structure slice: boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards","Object type: class","Candidate context: structural slice boards"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-gat562_mesh_evb_pro-include-boards:element:iradiopacketio","mermaidId":"IRadioPacketIo","label":"IRadioPacketIo","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-gat562_mesh_evb_pro-include-boards","summary":"IRadioPacketIo belongs to the boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards structural slice, which is used to explain a structural responsibility in the \"structural slice boards\", rather than being put into the diagram because it has a high number of relationships in the boards.","role":"Structure object: Its responsibilities must be explained in combination with Use Case, Sequence or Component drill-down evidence, and cannot be judged solely by name or directory.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/gat562_board.h, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":"Drilling down IRadioPacketIo should verify the specific roles it plays in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to avoid isolated class names being misinterpreted as business explanations.","businessRelevance":"IRadioPacketIo is a candidate technology carrier object for \"structural slicing boards\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its service through Trace/Refine links. When the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying IRadioPacketIo may affect the structural description in boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/gat562_board.h#L22","Structure slice: boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards","Object type: class","Candidate context: structural slice boards"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-gat562_mesh_evb_pro-include-boards:element:monodisplay","mermaidId":"MonoDisplay","label":"MonoDisplay","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-gat562_mesh_evb_pro-include-boards","summary":"MonoDisplay belongs to the boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards structural slice, which is used to explain a structural responsibility in the \"structural slice boards\", rather than being put into the diagram because it has a high number of relationships in the boards.","role":"Structure object: Its responsibilities must be explained in combination with Use Case, Sequence or Component drill-down evidence, and cannot be judged solely by name or directory.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/gat562_board.h, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":"Drill-down MonoDisplay should verify the specific roles it plays in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to avoid isolated class names being misinterpreted as business explanations.","businessRelevance":"MonoDisplay is a candidate technology carrier for \"structural slicing boards\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its services through Trace/Refine links. When the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying MonoDisplay may affect the structural description in boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/gat562_board.h#L17","Structure slice: boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/include/boards","Object type: class","Candidate context: structural slice boards"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]}]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-t_echo_lite-include-boards","kind":"class_structural","title":"Structural collaboration: structural slice boards · t_echo_lite/include/boards","summary":"Explain how the classes, interfaces, components or value objects in this structural slice share the structural responsibilities in the structural slice boards boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards; candidates include TEchoLiteBoard, Sx1262RadioPacketIo, TEchoLiteBoard::I2cGuard, GpsRuntime, Module.","docPath":"docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams/boards-t_echo_lite-include-boards/class-structural-diagram.md","htmlPath":"docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams/boards-t_echo_lite-include-boards/class-structural-diagram.html","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-t_echo_lite-include-boards","status":"candidate","confidence":"high","mermaidKind":"classDiagram","mermaid":"classDiagram\n class TEchoLiteBoard[\"TEchoLiteBoard\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n class Sx1262RadioPacketIo[\"Sx1262RadioPacketIo\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n class TEchoLiteBoard_I2cGuard[\"TEchoLiteBoard I2cGuard\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n class GpsRuntime[\"GpsRuntime\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n class Module[\"Module\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n class SX1262[\"SX1262\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n class TwoWire[\"TwoWire\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n class GpsRuntime_2[\"GpsRuntime\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n class InputRuntime[\"InputRuntime\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n class InputRuntime_2[\"InputRuntime\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n class IRadioPacketIo[\"IRadioPacketIo\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n class MonoDisplay[\"MonoDisplay\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n TEchoLiteBoard --|> TwoWire : Inherit\n TEchoLiteBoard_I2cGuard --|> TEchoLiteBoard : Inherit","readingGuide":["This Class / Structural Diagram focuses on the structural slice boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards, rather than the entire top-level directory of boards.","It only puts classes, interfaces, enumerations or structural types; method-level high-reference objects will enter Component/Hotspot and will no longer be mixed into the structural collaboration diagram.","The candidate context is \"structural slice boards\". When reading the diagram, first confirm whether these objects jointly carry the same business capabilities, share support mechanisms or adaptation boundaries.","Two class-level relationships have been drawn in the figure, mainly from inheritance, interface implementation, creation or reference evidence."],"technicalAnalysis":["boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards currently contains 12 classes/structures and 0 interface/trait candidates.","Currently, 2 class-level structural relationships are observed.","The explanation goal of this diagram is to structure responsibilities and boundaries: which objects are like domain models, which objects are like interface contracts, and which objects are like strategies/adapters or shared supports.","If the objects in the diagram are in the same directory but have no common business context or structural relationship, the generation process must be split or downgraded to Component/Hotspot instead of continuing to remain as Class/Structural Diagram."],"businessRelation":["This diagram candidate is associated with \"structural slice boards\" and should be connected back to the Class Collaboration, Activity or Sequence drill-down diagram corresponding to the Use Case in the organization/process model.","The software structure model cannot just say \"there are many classes here\", but should explain how these classes make business changes easier or more difficult."," Candidates include: TEchoLiteBoard, Sx1262RadioPacketIo, TEchoLiteBoard::I2cGuard, GpsRuntime, Module, SX1262."],"governanceNotes":["Don't think of top-level layers, directory names, or relationship numbers as interpretation objects of the structure diagram; the structure diagram must be centered around a nameable business/technical context.","When an object is out of the current context, has no relationship description, or is just a highly referenced utility class, it should be removed from the diagram and transferred to Component/Hotspot or shared support slice.","When changing boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards, maintain the reference relationship between it and the related Use Case, Component, and Sequence simultaneously."],"coverage":["Structure slice: boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards","Candidate business/technical context: structural slice boards","Project boundary: boards","Number of candidate structure objects: 12","Number of candidate structure relationships: 2","Object: TEchoLiteBoard (class)","Object: Sx1262RadioPacketIo (class)","Object: TEchoLiteBoard::I2cGuard (class)","Object: GpsRuntime (class)","Object: Module (class)","Object: SX1262 (class)","Object: TwoWire (class)","Object: GpsRuntime (class)"],"evidencePaths":["boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/t_echo_lite_board.h#L83","boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/sx1262_radio_packet_io.h#L13","boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/t_echo_lite_board.h#L86","boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/gps_runtime.h#L13","boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/sx1262_radio_packet_io.h#L7","boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/sx1262_radio_packet_io.h#L8","boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/t_echo_lite_board.h#L13","boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/t_echo_lite_board.h#L28","boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/input_runtime.h#L10","boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/t_echo_lite_board.h#L29"],"questions":["This structural slice comes from local warehouse evidence; currently there is not enough Trace evidence found to bind it to the unique business story, so it is only used as a candidate perspective of the software structural model."],"scope":{"packageId":"boards","filePath":"boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards"},"drilldowns":[{"id":"engineering:diagram:component:boards-makeboardprofile","kind":"component","title":"Function node: makeBoardProfile","summary":"function is located at boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/board_profile.h#L188, coordinates multiple external objects or capabilities, and is used to explain technical collaboration and change impact areas.","docPath":"docs/engineering/component-diagrams/boards-makeboardprofile/component-diagram.md","htmlPath":"docs/engineering/component-diagrams/boards-makeboardprofile/component-diagram.html","anchor":"engineering:component:function:makeboardprofile:boards-t_echo_lite-include-boards-t_echo_lite-board_profile.h:188","relation":"realized_by","reason":"Open the component perspective of the function node: makeBoardProfile to verify whether the object role in the structure diagram is supported by the file anchor boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/board_profile.h, the referenced/called relationship and the downstream relationship evidence."},{"id":"engineering:diagram:component:boards-pinnum","kind":"component","title":"Function node: pinNum","summary":"The function is located in boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/board_profile.h#L8. It is reused or relied on by multiple objects and is used to explain technical collaboration and change impact.","docPath":"docs/engineering/component-diagrams/boards-pinnum/component-diagram.md","htmlPath":"docs/engineering/component-diagrams/boards-pinnum/component-diagram.html","anchor":"engineering:component:function:pinnum:boards-t_echo_lite-include-boards-t_echo_lite-board_profile.h:8","relation":"realized_by","reason":"Open the component perspective of function node: pinNum to verify whether the object role in the structure diagram is supported by the file anchor boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/board_profile.h, the referenced/called relationship and the downstream relationship evidence."},{"id":"engineering:diagram:technical-hotspot:dependency-cluster--boards","kind":"technical_hotspot","title":"Dependency cluster: boards technology hotspots","summary":"This module relies on multiple external boundaries and is currently processed as a candidate technology coupling center; only the dependency directions and boundaries that have been observed by warehouse evidence are retained in the figure.","docPath":"docs/engineering/technical-hotspots/dependency-cluster--boards/technical-hotspot.md","htmlPath":"docs/engineering/technical-hotspots/dependency-cluster--boards/technical-hotspot.html","anchor":"engineering:hotspot:dependency-cluster:boards","relation":"risk_detail","reason":"Look at hot spots within the boundaries of the structure to identify which objects, files, or relationship clusters the complexity is concentrated on."}],"elements":[{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-t_echo_lite-include-boards:element:techoliteboard","mermaidId":"TEchoLiteBoard","label":"TEchoLiteBoard","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-t_echo_lite-include-boards","summary":"TEchoLiteBoard belongs to the boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards structural slice, which is used to explain a structural responsibility in the \"structural slice boards\", rather than being put into the diagram because it has a high number of relationships in the boards.","role":"Structure object: Its responsibilities must be explained in combination with Use Case, Sequence or Component drill-down evidence, and cannot be judged solely by name or directory.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/t_echo_lite_board.h, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":"Drilling down TEchoLiteBoard should verify the specific roles it plays in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to avoid isolated class names being misinterpreted as business explanations.","businessRelevance":"TEchoLiteBoard is a candidate technology carrier object for \"structural slicing boards\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its service through Trace/Refine links. If the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying TEchoLiteBoard may affect the structural description in boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/t_echo_lite_board.h#L83","Structure slice: boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards","Object type: class","Candidate context: structural slice boards"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-t_echo_lite-include-boards:element:sx1262radiopacketio","mermaidId":"Sx1262RadioPacketIo","label":"Sx1262RadioPacketIo","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-t_echo_lite-include-boards","summary":"Sx1262RadioPacketIo belongs to the boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards structural slice, which is used to explain a structural responsibility in the \"structural slice boards\", rather than being put into the diagram because it has a high number of relationships in the boards.","role":"Structure object: Its responsibilities must be explained in combination with Use Case, Sequence or Component drill-down evidence, and cannot be judged solely by name or directory.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/sx1262_radio_packet_io.h, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":"Drilling down Sx1262RadioPacketIo should verify the specific role it plays in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to avoid isolated class names being misinterpreted as business explanations.","businessRelevance":"Sx1262RadioPacketIo is a candidate technology carrier object for \"structural slicing boards\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its service through Trace/Refine links. If the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying Sx1262RadioPacketIo may affect the structure description in boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/sx1262_radio_packet_io.h#L13","Structure slice: boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards","Object type: class","Candidate context: structural slice boards"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-t_echo_lite-include-boards:element:techoliteboard::i2cguard","mermaidId":"TEchoLiteBoard_I2cGuard","label":"TEchoLiteBoard::I2cGuard","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-t_echo_lite-include-boards","summary":"TEchoLiteBoard::I2cGuard belongs to the boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards structural slice, which is used to explain a structural responsibility in the \"structural slice boards\", rather than being put into the diagram because it has a high number of relationships in the boards.","role":"Structure object: Its responsibilities must be explained in combination with Use Case, Sequence or Component drill-down evidence, and cannot be judged solely by name or directory.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/t_echo_lite_board.h, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":" Drilling down TEchoLiteBoard::I2cGuard should verify the specific roles it plays in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to avoid isolated class names being misinterpreted as business explanations.","businessRelevance":"TEchoLiteBoard::I2cGuard is a candidate technology carrier object for \"structural slicing boards\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its service through Trace/Refine links. When the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying TEchoLiteBoard::I2cGuard may affect the structure description in boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/t_echo_lite_board.h#L86","Structure slice: boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards","Object type: class","Candidate context: structural slice boards"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-t_echo_lite-include-boards:element:gpsruntime","mermaidId":"GpsRuntime","label":"GpsRuntime","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-t_echo_lite-include-boards","summary":"GpsRuntime belongs to the boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards structure slice, which is used to explain a structural responsibility in the \"structural slice boards\", rather than being put into the graph because it has a high number of relationships in the boards.","role":"Structure object: Its responsibilities must be explained in combination with Use Case, Sequence or Component drill-down evidence, and cannot be judged solely by name or directory.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/gps_runtime.h, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":"Drilling down to GpsRuntime should verify the specific roles it plays in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to avoid isolated class names being misinterpreted as business explanations.","businessRelevance":"GpsRuntime is a candidate technology carrier object for \"structural slicing boards\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its service through Trace/Refine links. If the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying GpsRuntime may affect the structure description in boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/gps_runtime.h#L13","Structure slice: boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards","Object type: class","Candidate context: structural slice boards"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-t_echo_lite-include-boards:element:module","mermaidId":"Module","label":"Module","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-t_echo_lite-include-boards","summary":"Module belongs to the boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards structural slice, which is used to explain a structural responsibility in the \"structural slice boards\", rather than being put into the diagram because it has a high number of relationships in the boards.","role":"Structure object: Its responsibilities must be explained in combination with Use Case, Sequence or Component drill-down evidence, and cannot be judged solely by name or directory.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/sx1262_radio_packet_io.h, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":"Drill-down Module should verify its specific role in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to prevent isolated class names from being misinterpreted as business explanations.","businessRelevance":"Module is a candidate technology carrier object for \"structural slicing boards\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its service through Trace/Refine links. When the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying Module may affect the structural description in boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/sx1262_radio_packet_io.h#L7","Structure slice: boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards","Object type: class","Candidate context: structural slice boards"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-t_echo_lite-include-boards:element:sx1262","mermaidId":"SX1262","label":"SX1262","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-t_echo_lite-include-boards","summary":"SX1262 belongs to the boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards structural slice, which is used to explain a structural responsibility in the \"structural slice boards\", rather than being put into the diagram because it has a high number of relationships in the boards.","role":"Structure object: Its responsibilities must be explained in combination with Use Case, Sequence or Component drill-down evidence, and cannot be judged solely by name or directory.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/sx1262_radio_packet_io.h, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":"Drill-down SX1262 should verify the specific role it plays in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to avoid isolated class names being misinterpreted as business explanations.","businessRelevance":"SX1262 is a candidate technology carrier object for \"structural slicing boards\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its service through Trace/Refine links. If the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying SX1262 may affect the structural description in boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/sx1262_radio_packet_io.h#L8","Structure slice: boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards","Object type: class","Candidate context: structural slice boards"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-t_echo_lite-include-boards:element:twowire","mermaidId":"TwoWire","label":"TwoWire","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-t_echo_lite-include-boards","summary":"TwoWire belongs to the boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards structural slice, which is used to explain a structural responsibility in the \"structural slice boards\", rather than being put into the diagram because it has a high number of relationships in the boards.","role":"Structure object: Its responsibilities must be explained in combination with Use Case, Sequence or Component drill-down evidence, and cannot be judged solely by name or directory.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/t_echo_lite_board.h, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":"Drill-down TwoWire should verify the specific roles it plays in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to prevent isolated class names from being misinterpreted as business explanations.","businessRelevance":"TwoWire is a candidate technology carrier for \"structural slicing boards\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its service through Trace/Refine links. When the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying TwoWire may affect the structural description in boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/t_echo_lite_board.h#L13","Structure slice: boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards","Object type: class","Candidate context: structural slice boards"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-t_echo_lite-include-boards:element:gpsruntime","mermaidId":"GpsRuntime","label":"GpsRuntime","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-t_echo_lite-include-boards","summary":"GpsRuntime belongs to the boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards structure slice, which is used to explain a structural responsibility in the \"structural slice boards\", rather than being put into the graph because it has a high number of relationships in the boards.","role":"Structure object: Its responsibilities must be explained in combination with Use Case, Sequence or Component drill-down evidence, and cannot be judged solely by name or directory.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/t_echo_lite_board.h, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":"Drilling down to GpsRuntime should verify the specific roles it plays in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to avoid isolated class names being misinterpreted as business explanations.","businessRelevance":"GpsRuntime is a candidate technology carrier object for \"structural slicing boards\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its service through Trace/Refine links. If the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying GpsRuntime may affect the structure description in boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/t_echo_lite_board.h#L28","Structure slice: boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards","Object type: class","Candidate context: structural slice boards"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-t_echo_lite-include-boards:element:inputruntime","mermaidId":"InputRuntime","label":"InputRuntime","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-t_echo_lite-include-boards","summary":"InputRuntime belongs to the boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards structure slice, which is used to explain a structural responsibility in the \"structural slice boards\", rather than being put into the graph because it has a high number of relationships in the boards.","role":"Structure object: Its responsibilities must be explained in combination with Use Case, Sequence or Component drill-down evidence, and cannot be judged solely by name or directory.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/input_runtime.h, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":"Drill-down InputRuntime should verify the specific role it plays in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to avoid isolated class names being misinterpreted as business explanations.","businessRelevance":"InputRuntime is a candidate technology carrier object for \"structural slicing boards\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its service through Trace/Refine links. When the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying InputRuntime may affect the structural description in boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/input_runtime.h#L10","Structure slice: boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards","Object type: class","Candidate context: structural slice boards"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-t_echo_lite-include-boards:element:inputruntime","mermaidId":"InputRuntime","label":"InputRuntime","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-t_echo_lite-include-boards","summary":"InputRuntime belongs to the boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards structure slice, which is used to explain a structural responsibility in the \"structural slice boards\", rather than being put into the graph because it has a high number of relationships in the boards.","role":"Structure object: Its responsibilities must be explained in combination with Use Case, Sequence or Component drill-down evidence, and cannot be judged solely by name or directory.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/t_echo_lite_board.h, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":"Drill-down InputRuntime should verify the specific role it plays in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to avoid isolated class names being misinterpreted as business explanations.","businessRelevance":"InputRuntime is a candidate technology carrier object for \"structural slicing boards\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its service through Trace/Refine links. When the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying InputRuntime may affect the structural description in boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/t_echo_lite_board.h#L29","Structure slice: boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards","Object type: class","Candidate context: structural slice boards"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-t_echo_lite-include-boards:element:iradiopacketio","mermaidId":"IRadioPacketIo","label":"IRadioPacketIo","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-t_echo_lite-include-boards","summary":"IRadioPacketIo belongs to the boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards structural slice, which is used to explain a structural responsibility in the \"structural slice boards\", rather than being put into the diagram because it has a high number of relationships in the boards.","role":"Structure object: Its responsibilities must be explained in combination with Use Case, Sequence or Component drill-down evidence, and cannot be judged solely by name or directory.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/t_echo_lite_board.h, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":"Drilling down IRadioPacketIo should verify the specific roles it plays in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to avoid isolated class names being misinterpreted as business explanations.","businessRelevance":"IRadioPacketIo is a candidate technology carrier object for \"structural slicing boards\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its service through Trace/Refine links. When the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying IRadioPacketIo may affect the structural description in boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/t_echo_lite_board.h#L22","Structure slice: boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards","Object type: class","Candidate context: structural slice boards"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-t_echo_lite-include-boards:element:monodisplay","mermaidId":"MonoDisplay","label":"MonoDisplay","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-t_echo_lite-include-boards","summary":"MonoDisplay belongs to the boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards structural slice, which is used to explain a structural responsibility in the \"structural slice boards\", rather than being put into the diagram because it has a high number of relationships in the boards.","role":"Structure object: Its responsibilities must be explained in combination with Use Case, Sequence or Component drill-down evidence, and cannot be judged solely by name or directory.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/t_echo_lite_board.h, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":"Drill-down MonoDisplay should verify the specific roles it plays in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to avoid isolated class names being misinterpreted as business explanations.","businessRelevance":"MonoDisplay is a candidate technology carrier for \"structural slicing boards\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its services through Trace/Refine links. When the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying MonoDisplay may affect the structural description in boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/t_echo_lite_board.h#L17","Structure slice: boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards","Object type: class","Candidate context: structural slice boards"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]}]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-tab5-include-boards","kind":"class_structural","title":"Structural collaboration: structural slicing boards · tab5/include/boards","summary":"Explain how classes, interfaces, components or value objects in the structural slice boards/tab5/include/boards share structural responsibilities in the structural slice boards; candidates include Tab5Board, Tab5Board::ManagedSystemI2cGuard, Tab5Board::SysI2cGuard, and CodecCompat.","docPath":"docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams/boards-tab5-include-boards/class-structural-diagram.md","htmlPath":"docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams/boards-tab5-include-boards/class-structural-diagram.html","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-tab5-include-boards","status":"candidate","confidence":"high","mermaidKind":"classDiagram","mermaid":"classDiagram\n class Tab5Board[\"Tab5Board\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n class Tab5Board_ManagedSystemI2cGuard[\"Tab5Board ManagedSystemI2cGuard\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n class Tab5Board_SysI2cGuard[\"Tab5Board SysI2cGuard\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n class CodecCompat[\"CodecCompat\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n Tab5Board_SysI2cGuard --|> Tab5Board : Inherit\n Tab5Board_ManagedSystemI2cGuard --|> Tab5Board : Inherit","readingGuide":["This Class / Structural Diagram focuses on the structural slice of boards/tab5/include/boards, rather than the entire top-level directory of boards.","It only puts classes, interfaces, enumerations or structural types; method-level high-reference objects will enter Component/Hotspot and will no longer be mixed into the structural collaboration diagram.","The candidate context is \"structural slice boards\". When reading the diagram, first confirm whether these objects jointly carry the same business capabilities, share support mechanisms or adaptation boundaries.","Two class-level relationships have been drawn in the figure, mainly from inheritance, interface implementation, creation or reference evidence."],"technicalAnalysis":["boards/tab5/include/boards currently contains 4 classes/structures and 0 interface/trait candidates.","Currently, 2 class-level structural relationships are observed.","The explanation goal of this diagram is to structure responsibilities and boundaries: which objects are like domain models, which objects are like interface contracts, and which objects are like strategies/adapters or shared supports.","If the objects in the diagram are in the same directory but have no common business context or structural relationship, the generation process must be split or downgraded to Component/Hotspot instead of continuing to remain as Class/Structural Diagram."],"businessRelation":["This diagram candidate is associated with \"structural slice boards\" and should be connected back to the Class Collaboration, Activity or Sequence drill-down diagram corresponding to the Use Case in the organization/process model.","The software structure model cannot just say \"there are many classes here\", but should explain how these classes make business changes easier or more difficult.","Candidates include: Tab5Board, Tab5Board::ManagedSystemI2cGuard, Tab5Board::SysI2cGuard, CodecCompat."],"governanceNotes":["Do not think of top-level layers, directory names, or relationship numbers as the interpretation objects of the structure diagram; the structure diagram must be centered around a nameable business/technical context.","When an object is out of the current context, has no relationship description, or is just a highly referenced utility class, it should be removed from the diagram and transferred to Component/Hotspot or shared support slice.","When changing boards/tab5/include/boards, simultaneously maintain the reference relationship between it and the related Use Case, Component, and Sequence."],"coverage":["Structural slice: boards/tab5/include/boards","Candidate business/technical context: structural slice boards","Project boundary: boards","Number of candidate structure objects: 4","Number of candidate structure relationships: 2","Object: Tab5Board (class)","Object: Tab5Board::ManagedSystemI2cGuard (class)","Object: Tab5Board::SysI2cGuard (class)","Object: CodecCompat (class)"],"evidencePaths":["boards/tab5/include/boards/tab5/tab5_board.h#L17","boards/tab5/include/boards/tab5/tab5_board.h#L44","boards/tab5/include/boards/tab5/tab5_board.h#L27","boards/tab5/include/boards/tab5/codec_compat.h#L9"],"questions":["This structural slice comes from local warehouse evidence; currently there is not enough Trace evidence found to bind it to the unique business story, so it is only used as a candidate perspective of the software structural model."],"scope":{"packageId":"boards","filePath":"boards/tab5/include/boards"},"drilldowns":[{"id":"engineering:diagram:technical-hotspot:dependency-cluster--boards","kind":"technical_hotspot","title":"Dependency cluster: boards technology hotspots","summary":"This module relies on multiple external boundaries and is currently processed as a candidate technology coupling center; only the dependency directions and boundaries that have been observed by warehouse evidence are retained in the figure.","docPath":"docs/engineering/technical-hotspots/dependency-cluster--boards/technical-hotspot.md","htmlPath":"docs/engineering/technical-hotspots/dependency-cluster--boards/technical-hotspot.html","anchor":"engineering:hotspot:dependency-cluster:boards","relation":"risk_detail","reason":"Look at hot spots within the boundaries of the structure to identify which objects, files, or relationship clusters the complexity is concentrated on."}],"elements":[{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-tab5-include-boards:element:tab5board","mermaidId":"Tab5Board","label":"Tab5Board","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-tab5-include-boards","summary":"Tab5Board belongs to the boards/tab5/include/boards structural slice, which is used to explain a structural responsibility in the \"structural slice boards\", rather than being put into the diagram because it has a high number of relationships in the boards.","role":"Structure object: Its responsibilities must be explained in combination with Use Case, Sequence or Component drill-down evidence, and cannot be judged solely by name or directory.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/tab5/include/boards/tab5/tab5_board.h, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":"Drill-down Tab5Board should verify the specific roles it plays in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to avoid isolated class names being misinterpreted as business explanations.","businessRelevance":"Tab5Board is a candidate technology carrier object for \"structural slicing boards\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its service through Trace/Refine links. When the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying Tab5Board may affect the structural description in boards/tab5/include/boards, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/tab5/include/boards/tab5/tab5_board.h#L17","Structural slice: boards/tab5/include/boards","Object type: class","Candidate context: structural slice boards"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-tab5-include-boards:element:tab5board::managedsystemi2cguard","mermaidId":"Tab5Board_ManagedSystemI2cGuard","label":"Tab5Board::ManagedSystemI2cGuard","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-tab5-include-boards","summary":"Tab5Board::ManagedSystemI2cGuard belongs to the boards/tab5/include/boards structure slice, which is used to explain a structural responsibility in the \"structural slice boards\", rather than being put into the diagram because it has a high number of relationships in the boards.","role":"Structure object: Its responsibilities must be explained in combination with Use Case, Sequence or Component drill-down evidence, and cannot be judged solely by name or directory.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/tab5/include/boards/tab5/tab5_board.h, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":"Drill-down Tab5Board::ManagedSystemI2cGuard should verify the specific roles it plays in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to avoid isolated class names being misinterpreted as business explanations.","businessRelevance":"Tab5Board::ManagedSystemI2cGuard is a candidate technology carrier object for \"structural slicing boards\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its service through Trace/Refine links. When the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying Tab5Board::ManagedSystemI2cGuard may affect the structure description in boards/tab5/include/boards, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/tab5/include/boards/tab5/tab5_board.h#L44","Structural slice: boards/tab5/include/boards","Object type: class","Candidate context: structural slice boards"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-tab5-include-boards:element:tab5board::sysi2cguard","mermaidId":"Tab5Board_SysI2cGuard","label":"Tab5Board::SysI2cGuard","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-tab5-include-boards","summary":"Tab5Board::SysI2cGuard belongs to the boards/tab5/include/boards structure slice and is used to explain a structural responsibility in the \"structural slice boards\", rather than being put into the diagram because it has a high number of relationships in the boards.","role":"Structure object: Its responsibilities must be explained in combination with Use Case, Sequence or Component drill-down evidence, and cannot be judged solely by name or directory.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/tab5/include/boards/tab5/tab5_board.h, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":"Drill-down Tab5Board::SysI2cGuard should verify the specific role it plays in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to avoid isolated class names being misinterpreted as business explanations.","businessRelevance":"Tab5Board::SysI2cGuard is a candidate technology carrier object for \"structural slicing boards\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its service through Trace/Refine links. If the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying Tab5Board::SysI2cGuard may affect the structural description in boards/tab5/include/boards, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/tab5/include/boards/tab5/tab5_board.h#L27","Structural slice: boards/tab5/include/boards","Object type: class","Candidate context: structural slice boards"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-tab5-include-boards:element:codeccompat","mermaidId":"CodecCompat","label":"CodecCompat","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-tab5-include-boards","summary":"CodecCompat belongs to the boards/tab5/include/boards structure slice, which is used to explain a structural responsibility in the \"structural slice boards\", rather than being put into the diagram because it has a high number of relationships in the boards.","role":"Structure object: Its responsibilities must be explained in combination with Use Case, Sequence or Component drill-down evidence, and cannot be judged solely by name or directory.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/tab5/include/boards/tab5/codec_compat.h, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":"Drill-down CodecCompat should verify the specific roles it plays in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to avoid isolated class names being misinterpreted as business explanations.","businessRelevance":"CodecCompat is a candidate technology carrier object for \"structural slicing boards\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its service through Trace/Refine links. When the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying CodecCompat may affect the structural description in boards/tab5/include/boards, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/tab5/include/boards/tab5/codec_compat.h#L9","Structural slice: boards/tab5/include/boards","Object type: class","Candidate context: structural slice boards"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]}]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-t_display_p4-include-boards","kind":"class_structural","title":"Structure collaboration: structure slicing boards · t_display_p4/include/boards","summary":"Explain how the classes, interfaces, components or value objects in the structural slice boards/t_display_p4/include/boards share the structural responsibilities in the structural slice boards; candidates include TDisplayP4Board, TDisplayP4Board::ManagedSystemI2cGuard.","docPath":"docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams/boards-t_display_p4-include-boards/class-structural-diagram.md","htmlPath":"docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams/boards-t_display_p4-include-boards/class-structural-diagram.html","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-t_display_p4-include-boards","status":"candidate","confidence":"high","mermaidKind":"classDiagram","mermaid":"classDiagram\n class TDisplayP4Board[\"TDisplayP4Board\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n class TDisplayP4Board_ManagedSystemI2cGuard[\"TDisplayP4Board ManagedSystemI2cGuard\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n TDisplayP4Board_ManagedSystemI2cGuard --|> TDisplayP4Board : I","readingGuide":["This Class / Structural Diagram focuses on the structural slice boards/t_display_p4/include/boards, rather than the entire top-level directory of boards.","It only puts classes, interfaces, enumerations or structural types; method-level high-reference objects will enter Component/Hotspot and will no longer be mixed into the structural collaboration diagram.","The candidate context is \"structural slice boards\". When reading the diagram, first confirm whether these objects jointly carry the same business capabilities, share support mechanisms or adaptation boundaries.","One class-level relationship has been drawn in the figure, mainly from inheritance, interface implementation, creation or reference evidence."],"technicalAnalysis":["boards/t_display_p4/include/boards currently contains 2 class/structure and 0 interface/trait candidates.","Currently, 1 class-level structural relationship is observed.","The explanation goal of this diagram is to structure responsibilities and boundaries: which objects are like domain models, which objects are like interface contracts, and which objects are like strategies/adapters or shared supports.","If the objects in the diagram are in the same directory but have no common business context or structural relationship, the generation process must be split or downgraded to Component/Hotspot instead of continuing to remain as Class/Structural Diagram."],"businessRelation":["This diagram candidate is associated with \"structural slice boards\" and should be connected back to the Class Collaboration, Activity or Sequence drill-down diagram corresponding to the Use Case in the organization/process model.","The software structure model cannot just say \"there are many classes here\", but should explain how these classes make business changes easier or more difficult.","Candidates include: TDisplayP4Board, TDisplayP4Board::ManagedSystemI2cGuard."],"governanceNotes":["Do not think of top-level layers, directory names, or relationship numbers as the interpretation objects of the structure diagram; the structure diagram must be centered around a nameable business/technical context.","When an object is out of the current context, has no relationship description, or is just a highly referenced utility class, it should be removed from the diagram and transferred to Component/Hotspot or shared support slice.","When changing boards/t_display_p4/include/boards, maintain the reference relationship between it and the related Use Case, Component, and Sequence simultaneously."],"coverage":["Structure slice: boards/t_display_p4/include/boards","Candidate business/technical context: structural slice boards","Project boundary: boards","Number of candidate structure objects: 2","Number of candidate structure relationships: 1","Object: TDisplayP4Board (class)","Object: TDisplayP4Board::ManagedSystemI2cGuard (class)"],"evidencePaths":["boards/t_display_p4/include/boards/t_display_p4/t_display_p4_board.h#L43","boards/t_display_p4/include/boards/t_display_p4/t_display_p4_board.h#L53"],"questions":["This structural slice comes from local warehouse evidence; currently there is not enough Trace evidence found to bind it to the unique business story, so it is only used as a candidate perspective of the software structural model."],"scope":{"packageId":"boards","filePath":"boards/t_display_p4/include/boards"},"drilldowns":[{"id":"engineering:diagram:technical-hotspot:dependency-cluster--boards","kind":"technical_hotspot","title":"Dependency cluster: boards technology hotspots","summary":"This module relies on multiple external boundaries and is currently processed as a candidate technology coupling center; only the dependency directions and boundaries that have been observed by warehouse evidence are retained in the figure.","docPath":"docs/engineering/technical-hotspots/dependency-cluster--boards/technical-hotspot.md","htmlPath":"docs/engineering/technical-hotspots/dependency-cluster--boards/technical-hotspot.html","anchor":"engineering:hotspot:dependency-cluster:boards","relation":"risk_detail","reason":"Look at hot spots within the boundaries of the structure to identify which objects, files, or relationship clusters the complexity is concentrated on."}],"elements":[{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-t_display_p4-include-boards:element:tdisplayp4board","mermaidId":"TDisplayP4Board","label":"TDisplayP4Board","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-t_display_p4-include-boards","summary":"TDisplayP4Board belongs to the boards/t_display_p4/include/boards structure slice, which is used to explain a structural responsibility in the \"structural slice boards\", rather than being put into the diagram because it has a high number of relationships in the boards.","role":"Structure object: Its responsibilities must be explained in combination with Use Case, Sequence or Component drill-down evidence, and cannot be judged solely by name or directory.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/t_display_p4/include/boards/t_display_p4/t_display_p4_board.h, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":"Drilling down into TDisplayP4Board should verify the specific roles it plays in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to avoid isolated class names being misinterpreted as business explanations.","businessRelevance":"TDisplayP4Board is a candidate technology carrier object for \"structural slicing boards\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its service through Trace/Refine links. When the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying TDisplayP4Board may affect the structural description in boards/t_display_p4/include/boards, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/t_display_p4/include/boards/t_display_p4/t_display_p4_board.h#L43","Structure slice: boards/t_display_p4/include/boards","Object type: class","Candidate context: structural slice boards"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-t_display_p4-include-boards:element:tdisplayp4board::managedsystemi2cguard","mermaidId":"TDisplayP4Board_ManagedSystemI2cGuard","label":"TDisplayP4Board::ManagedSystemI2cGuard","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-t_display_p4-include-boards","summary":"TDisplayP4Board::ManagedSystemI2cGuard belongs to the boards/t_display_p4/include/boards structural slice, which is used to explain a structural responsibility in the \"structural slice boards\", rather than being put into the diagram because it has a high number of relationships in the boards.","role":"Structure object: Its responsibilities must be explained in combination with Use Case, Sequence or Component drill-down evidence, and cannot be judged solely by name or directory.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/t_display_p4/include/boards/t_display_p4/t_display_p4_board.h, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":"Drill down TDisplayP4Board::ManagedSystemI2cGuard should verify the specific role it plays in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to avoid the isolated class name being misinterpreted as a business explanation.","businessRelevance":"TDisplayP4Board::ManagedSystemI2cGuard is a candidate technology carrier object for \"structural slicing boards\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its service through Trace/Refine links. If the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying TDisplayP4Board::ManagedSystemI2cGuard may affect the structure description in boards/t_display_p4/include/boards, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/t_display_p4/include/boards/t_display_p4/t_display_p4_board.h#L53","Structure slice: boards/t_display_p4/include/boards","Object type: class","Candidate context: structural slice boards"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]}]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-tlora_pager-include-boards","kind":"class_structural","title":"Structural collaboration: structural slicing boards · tlora_pager/include/boards","summary":"Explain how the classes, interfaces, components or value objects in the structural slice boards/tlora_pager/include/boards share the structural responsibilities in the structural slice boards; candidates include TLoRaPagerBoard, SX1262Access, AppContext.","docPath":"docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams/boards-tlora_pager-include-boards/class-structural-diagram.md","htmlPath":"docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams/boards-tlora_pager-include-boards/class-structural-diagram.html","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-tlora_pager-include-boards","status":"candidate","confidence":"high","mermaidKind":"classDiagram","mermaid":"classDiagram\n class TLoRaPagerBoard[\"TLoRaPagerBoard\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n class SX1262Access[\"SX1262Access\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n class AppContext[\"AppContext\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n note for TLoRaPagerBoard \"S\"","readingGuide":["This Class / Structural Diagram focuses on the structural slice of boards/tlora_pager/include/boards, rather than the entire top-level directory of boards.","It only puts classes, interfaces, enumerations or structural types; method-level high-reference objects will enter Component/Hotspot and will no longer be mixed into the structural collaboration diagram.","The candidate context is \"structural slice boards\". When reading the diagram, first confirm whether these objects jointly carry the same business capabilities, share support mechanisms or adaptation boundaries.","Currently there is not enough evidence of class-level relationships, so the graph only retains candidate slice objects and reduces them to structural candidate perspectives."],"technicalAnalysis":["boards/tlora_pager/include/boards currently contains 3 classes/structures and 0 interface/trait candidates.","Currently there is a lack of class-level relationship evidence, and objects in the same directory cannot be directly interpreted as stable collaboration.","The explanation goal of this diagram is to structure responsibilities and boundaries: which objects are like domain models, which objects are like interface contracts, and which objects are like strategies/adapters or shared supports.","If the objects in the diagram are in the same directory but have no common business context or structural relationship, the generation process must be split or downgraded to Component/Hotspot instead of continuing to remain as Class/Structural Diagram."],"businessRelation":["This diagram candidate is associated with \"structural slice boards\" and should be connected back to the Class Collaboration, Activity or Sequence drill-down diagram corresponding to the Use Case in the organization/process model.","The software structure model cannot just say \"there are many classes here\", but should explain how these classes make business changes easier or more difficult."," Candidates include: TLoRaPagerBoard, SX1262Access, AppContext."],"governanceNotes":["Do not think of top-level layers, directory names, or relationship numbers as the interpretation objects of the structure diagram; the structure diagram must be centered around a nameable business/technical context.","When an object is out of the current context, has no relationship description, or is just a highly referenced utility class, it should be removed from the diagram and transferred to Component/Hotspot or shared support slice.","When changing boards/tlora_pager/include/boards, simultaneously maintain the reference relationship between it and the related Use Case, Component, and Sequence."],"coverage":["Structural slice: boards/tlora_pager/include/boards","Candidate business/technical context: structural slice boards","Project boundary: boards","Number of candidate structure objects: 3","Number of candidate structure relationships: 0","Object: TLoRaPagerBoard (class)","Object: SX1262Access (class)","Object: AppContext (class)"],"evidencePaths":["boards/tlora_pager/include/boards/tlora_pager/tlora_pager_board.h#L79","boards/tlora_pager/include/boards/tlora_pager/tlora_pager_board.h#L57","boards/tlora_pager/include/boards/tlora_pager/tlora_pager_board.h#L26"],"questions":["This structural slice comes from local warehouse evidence; currently there is not enough Trace evidence found to bind it to the unique business story, so it is only used as a candidate perspective of the software structural model."],"scope":{"packageId":"boards","filePath":"boards/tlora_pager/include/boards"},"drilldowns":[{"id":"engineering:diagram:technical-hotspot:dependency-cluster--boards","kind":"technical_hotspot","title":"Dependency cluster: boards technology hotspots","summary":"This module relies on multiple external boundaries and is currently processed as a candidate technology coupling center; only the dependency directions and boundaries that have been observed by warehouse evidence are retained in the figure.","docPath":"docs/engineering/technical-hotspots/dependency-cluster--boards/technical-hotspot.md","htmlPath":"docs/engineering/technical-hotspots/dependency-cluster--boards/technical-hotspot.html","anchor":"engineering:hotspot:dependency-cluster:boards","relation":"risk_detail","reason":"Look at hot spots within the boundaries of the structure to identify which objects, files, or relationship clusters the complexity is concentrated on."}],"elements":[{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-tlora_pager-include-boards:element:tlorapagerboard","mermaidId":"TLoRaPagerBoard","label":"TLoRaPagerBoard","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-tlora_pager-include-boards","summary":"TLoRaPagerBoard belongs to the boards/tlora_pager/include/boards structural slice, which is used to explain a structural responsibility in the \"structural slice boards\", rather than being put into the graph because it has a high number of relationships in the boards.","role":"Structure object: Its responsibilities must be explained in combination with Use Case, Sequence or Component drill-down evidence, and cannot be judged solely by name or directory.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/tlora_pager/include/boards/tlora_pager/tlora_pager_board.h, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":"Drilling down on TLoRaPagerBoard should verify the specific roles it plays in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to avoid isolated class names being misinterpreted as business explanations.","businessRelevance":"TLoRaPagerBoard is a candidate technology carrier object for \"structural slicing boards\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its service through Trace/Refine links. When the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying TLoRaPagerBoard may affect the structural description in boards/tlora_pager/include/boards, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/tlora_pager/include/boards/tlora_pager/tlora_pager_board.h#L79","Structural slice: boards/tlora_pager/include/boards","Object type: class","Candidate context: structural slice boards"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-tlora_pager-include-boards:element:sx1262access","mermaidId":"SX1262Access","label":"SX1262Access","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-tlora_pager-include-boards","summary":"SX1262Access belongs to the boards/tlora_pager/include/boards structural slice, which is used to explain a structural responsibility in the \"structural slice boards\", rather than being put into the diagram because it has a high number of relationships in the boards.","role":"Structure object: Its responsibilities must be explained in combination with Use Case, Sequence or Component drill-down evidence, and cannot be judged solely by name or directory.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/tlora_pager/include/boards/tlora_pager/tlora_pager_board.h, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":"Drill-down SX1262Access should verify the specific roles it plays in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to avoid isolated class names being misinterpreted as business explanations.","businessRelevance":"SX1262Access is a candidate technology carrier object for \"structural slicing boards\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its service through Trace/Refine links. If the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying SX1262Access may affect the structural description in boards/tlora_pager/include/boards, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/tlora_pager/include/boards/tlora_pager/tlora_pager_board.h#L57","Structural slice: boards/tlora_pager/include/boards","Object type: class","Candidate context: structural slice boards"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-tlora_pager-include-boards:element:appcontext","mermaidId":"AppContext","label":"AppContext","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-tlora_pager-include-boards","summary":"AppContext belongs to the boards/tlora_pager/include/boards structural slice, which is used to explain a structural responsibility in the \"structural slice boards\", rather than being put into the diagram because it has a high number of relationships in the boards.","role":"Value object/context object: It provides value semantics or context semantics for cross-process reuse.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/tlora_pager/include/boards/tlora_pager/tlora_pager_board.h, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":"Drilling down the AppContext should verify the specific roles it plays in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to prevent isolated class names from being misinterpreted as business explanations.","businessRelevance":"AppContext is a candidate technology carrier object for \"structural slicing boards\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its service through Trace/Refine links. When the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying the AppContext may affect the structural description in boards/tlora_pager/include/boards, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/tlora_pager/include/boards/tlora_pager/tlora_pager_board.h#L26","Structural slice: boards/tlora_pager/include/boards","Object type: class","Candidate context: structural slice boards"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]}]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-tdeck-include-boards","kind":"class_structural","title":"Structural collaboration: structural slicing boards · tdeck/include/boards","summary":"Explain how classes, interfaces, components or value objects in the structural slice boards/tdeck/include/boards share structural responsibilities in the structural slice boards; candidates include TDeckBoard and SX1262Access.","docPath":"docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams/boards-tdeck-include-boards/class-structural-diagram.md","htmlPath":"docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams/boards-tdeck-include-boards/class-structural-diagram.html","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-tdeck-include-boards","status":"candidate","confidence":"high","mermaidKind":"classDiagram","mermaid":"classDiagram\n class TDeckBoard[\"TDeckBoard\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n class SX1262Access[\"SX1262Access\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n note for TDeckBoard \"S\"","readingGuide":["This Class / Structural Diagram focuses on the structural slice of boards/tdeck/include/boards, rather than the entire top-level directory of boards.","It only puts classes, interfaces, enumerations or structural types; method-level high-reference objects will enter Component/Hotspot and will no longer be mixed into the structural collaboration diagram.","The candidate context is \"structural slice boards\". When reading the diagram, first confirm whether these objects jointly carry the same business capabilities, share support mechanisms or adaptation boundaries.","Currently there is not enough evidence of class-level relationships, so the graph only retains candidate slice objects and reduces them to structural candidate perspectives."],"technicalAnalysis":["boards/tdeck/include/boards currently contains 2 class/structure and 0 interface/trait candidates.","Currently there is a lack of class-level relationship evidence, and objects in the same directory cannot be directly interpreted as stable collaboration.","The explanation goal of this diagram is to structure responsibilities and boundaries: which objects are like domain models, which objects are like interface contracts, and which objects are like strategies/adapters or shared supports.","If the objects in the diagram are in the same directory but have no common business context or structural relationship, the generation process must be split or downgraded to Component/Hotspot instead of continuing to remain as Class/Structural Diagram."],"businessRelation":["This diagram candidate is associated with \"structural slice boards\" and should be connected back to the Class Collaboration, Activity or Sequence drill-down diagram corresponding to the Use Case in the organization/process model.","The software structure model cannot just say \"there are many classes here\", but should explain how these classes make business changes easier or more difficult.","Candidates include: TDeckBoard, SX1262Access."],"governanceNotes":["Do not think of top-level layers, directory names, or relationship numbers as the interpretation objects of the structure diagram; the structure diagram must be centered around a nameable business/technical context.","When an object is out of the current context, has no relationship description, or is just a highly referenced utility class, it should be removed from the diagram and transferred to Component/Hotspot or shared support slice.","When changing boards/tdeck/include/boards, simultaneously maintain the reference relationship between it and the related Use Case, Component, and Sequence."],"coverage":["Structure slice: boards/tdeck/include/boards","Candidate business/technical context: structural slice boards","Project boundary: boards","Number of candidate structure objects: 2","Number of candidate structure relationships: 0","Object: TDeckBoard (class)","Object: SX1262Access (class)"],"evidencePaths":["boards/tdeck/include/boards/tdeck/tdeck_board.h#L38","boards/tdeck/include/boards/tdeck/tdeck_board.h#L29"],"questions":["This structural slice comes from local warehouse evidence; currently there is not enough Trace evidence found to bind it to the unique business story, so it is only used as a candidate perspective of the software structural model."],"scope":{"packageId":"boards","filePath":"boards/tdeck/include/boards"},"drilldowns":[{"id":"engineering:diagram:technical-hotspot:dependency-cluster--boards","kind":"technical_hotspot","title":"Dependency cluster: boards technology hotspots","summary":"This module relies on multiple external boundaries and is currently processed as a candidate technology coupling center; only the dependency directions and boundaries that have been observed by warehouse evidence are retained in the figure.","docPath":"docs/engineering/technical-hotspots/dependency-cluster--boards/technical-hotspot.md","htmlPath":"docs/engineering/technical-hotspots/dependency-cluster--boards/technical-hotspot.html","anchor":"engineering:hotspot:dependency-cluster:boards","relation":"risk_detail","reason":"Look at hot spots within the boundaries of the structure to identify which objects, files, or relationship clusters the complexity is concentrated on."}],"elements":[{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-tdeck-include-boards:element:tdeckboard","mermaidId":"TDeckBoard","label":"TDeckBoard","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-tdeck-include-boards","summary":"TDeckBoard belongs to the boards/tdeck/include/boards structural slice, which is used to explain a structural responsibility in the \"structural slice boards\", rather than being put into the diagram because it has a high number of relationships in the boards.","role":"Structure object: Its responsibilities must be explained in combination with Use Case, Sequence or Component drill-down evidence, and cannot be judged solely by name or directory.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/tdeck/include/boards/tdeck/tdeck_board.h, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":"Drill-down TDeckBoard should verify the specific roles it plays in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to avoid isolated class names being misinterpreted as business explanations.","businessRelevance":"TDeckBoard is a candidate technology carrier object for \"structural slicing boards\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its service through Trace/Refine links. If the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying TDeckBoard may affect the structural description in boards/tdeck/include/boards, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/tdeck/include/boards/tdeck/tdeck_board.h#L38","Structure slice: boards/tdeck/include/boards","Object type: class","Candidate context: structural slice boards"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-tdeck-include-boards:element:sx1262access","mermaidId":"SX1262Access","label":"SX1262Access","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-tdeck-include-boards","summary":"SX1262Access belongs to the boards/tdeck/include/boards structural slice, which is used to explain a structural responsibility in the \"structural slice boards\", rather than being put into the diagram because it has a high number of relationships in the boards.","role":"Structure object: Its responsibilities must be explained in combination with Use Case, Sequence or Component drill-down evidence, and cannot be judged solely by name or directory.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/tdeck/include/boards/tdeck/tdeck_board.h, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":"Drill-down SX1262Access should verify the specific roles it plays in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to avoid isolated class names being misinterpreted as business explanations.","businessRelevance":"SX1262Access is a candidate technology carrier object for \"structural slicing boards\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its service through Trace/Refine links. If the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying SX1262Access may affect the structural description in boards/tdeck/include/boards, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/tdeck/include/boards/tdeck/tdeck_board.h#L29","Structure slice: boards/tdeck/include/boards","Object type: class","Candidate context: structural slice boards"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]}]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-tdeck_pro-include-boards","kind":"class_structural","title":"Structural collaboration: structural slice boards · tdeck_pro/include/boards","summary":"Explain how classes, interfaces, components or value objects in the structural slice boards/tdeck_pro/include/boards share structural responsibilities in the structural slice boards; candidates include TDeckProBoard and SX1262Access.","docPath":"docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams/boards-tdeck_pro-include-boards/class-structural-diagram.md","htmlPath":"docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams/boards-tdeck_pro-include-boards/class-structural-diagram.html","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-tdeck_pro-include-boards","status":"candidate","confidence":"high","mermaidKind":"classDiagram","mermaid":"classDiagram\n class TDeckProBoard[\"TDeckProBoard\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n class SX1262Access[\"SX1262Access\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n note for TDeckProBoard \"S\"","readingGuide":["This Class / Structural Diagram focuses on the structural slice of boards/tdeck_pro/include/boards, rather than the entire top-level directory of boards.","It only puts classes, interfaces, enumerations or structural types; method-level high-reference objects will enter Component/Hotspot and will no longer be mixed into the structural collaboration diagram.","The candidate context is \"structural slice boards\". When reading the diagram, first confirm whether these objects jointly carry the same business capabilities, share support mechanisms or adaptation boundaries.","Currently there is not enough evidence of class-level relationships, so the graph only retains candidate slice objects and reduces them to structural candidate perspectives."],"technicalAnalysis":["boards/tdeck_pro/include/boards currently contains 2 class/structure and 0 interface/trait candidates.","Currently there is a lack of class-level relationship evidence, and objects in the same directory cannot be directly interpreted as stable collaboration.","The explanation goal of this diagram is to structure responsibilities and boundaries: which objects are like domain models, which objects are like interface contracts, and which objects are like strategies/adapters or shared supports.","If the objects in the diagram are in the same directory but have no common business context or structural relationship, the generation process must be split or downgraded to Component/Hotspot instead of continuing to remain as Class/Structural Diagram."],"businessRelation":["This diagram candidate is associated with \"structural slice boards\" and should be connected back to the Class Collaboration, Activity or Sequence drill-down diagram corresponding to the Use Case in the organization/process model.","The software structure model cannot just say \"there are many classes here\", but should explain how these classes make business changes easier or more difficult.","Candidates include: TDeckProBoard, SX1262Access."],"governanceNotes":["Do not think of top-level layers, directory names, or relationship numbers as the interpretation objects of the structure diagram; the structure diagram must be centered around a nameable business/technical context.","When an object is out of the current context, has no relationship description, or is just a highly referenced utility class, it should be removed from the diagram and transferred to Component/Hotspot or shared support slice.","When changing boards/tdeck_pro/include/boards, simultaneously maintain the reference relationship between it and the related Use Case, Component, and Sequence."],"coverage":["Structure slice: boards/tdeck_pro/include/boards","Candidate business/technical context: structural slice boards","Project boundary: boards","Number of candidate structure objects: 2","Number of candidate structure relationships: 0","Object: TDeckProBoard (class)","Object: SX1262Access (class)"],"evidencePaths":["boards/tdeck_pro/include/boards/tdeck_pro/tdeck_pro_board.h#L38","boards/tdeck_pro/include/boards/tdeck_pro/tdeck_pro_board.h#L29"],"questions":["This structural slice comes from local warehouse evidence; currently there is not enough Trace evidence found to bind it to the unique business story, so it is only used as a candidate perspective of the software structural model."],"scope":{"packageId":"boards","filePath":"boards/tdeck_pro/include/boards"},"drilldowns":[{"id":"engineering:diagram:technical-hotspot:dependency-cluster--boards","kind":"technical_hotspot","title":"Dependency cluster: boards technology hotspots","summary":"This module relies on multiple external boundaries and is currently processed as a candidate technology coupling center; only the dependency directions and boundaries that have been observed by warehouse evidence are retained in the figure.","docPath":"docs/engineering/technical-hotspots/dependency-cluster--boards/technical-hotspot.md","htmlPath":"docs/engineering/technical-hotspots/dependency-cluster--boards/technical-hotspot.html","anchor":"engineering:hotspot:dependency-cluster:boards","relation":"risk_detail","reason":"Look at hot spots within the boundaries of the structure to identify which objects, files, or relationship clusters the complexity is concentrated on."}],"elements":[{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-tdeck_pro-include-boards:element:tdeckproboard","mermaidId":"TDeckProBoard","label":"TDeckProBoard","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-tdeck_pro-include-boards","summary":"TDeckProBoard belongs to the boards/tdeck_pro/include/boards structural slice, which is used to explain a structural responsibility in the \"structural slice boards\", rather than being put into the diagram because it has a high number of relationships in the boards.","role":"Structure object: Its responsibilities must be explained in combination with Use Case, Sequence or Component drill-down evidence, and cannot be judged solely by name or directory.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/tdeck_pro/include/boards/tdeck_pro/tdeck_pro_board.h, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":"Drill-down TDeckProBoard should verify the specific roles it plays in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to avoid isolated class names being misinterpreted as business explanations.","businessRelevance":"TDeckProBoard is a candidate technology carrier for \"structural slicing boards\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its service through Trace/Refine links. When the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying TDeckProBoard may affect the structural description in boards/tdeck_pro/include/boards, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/tdeck_pro/include/boards/tdeck_pro/tdeck_pro_board.h#L38","Structure slice: boards/tdeck_pro/include/boards","Object type: class","Candidate context: structural slice boards"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-tdeck_pro-include-boards:element:sx1262access","mermaidId":"SX1262Access","label":"SX1262Access","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-tdeck_pro-include-boards","summary":"SX1262Access belongs to the boards/tdeck_pro/include/boards structural slice, which is used to explain a structural responsibility in the \"structural slice boards\", rather than being put into the diagram because it has a high number of relationships in the boards.","role":"Structure object: Its responsibilities must be explained in combination with Use Case, Sequence or Component drill-down evidence, and cannot be judged solely by name or directory.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/tdeck_pro/include/boards/tdeck_pro/tdeck_pro_board.h, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":"Drill-down SX1262Access should verify the specific roles it plays in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to avoid isolated class names being misinterpreted as business explanations.","businessRelevance":"SX1262Access is a candidate technology carrier object for \"structural slicing boards\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its service through Trace/Refine links. If the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying SX1262Access may affect the structural description in boards/tdeck_pro/include/boards, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/tdeck_pro/include/boards/tdeck_pro/tdeck_pro_board.h#L29","Structure slice: boards/tdeck_pro/include/boards","Object type: class","Candidate context: structural slice boards"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]}]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-twatchs3-include-boards","kind":"class_structural","title":"Structural collaboration: structural slicing boards · twatchs3/include/boards","summary":"Explain how the classes, interfaces, components or value objects in the structural slice boards/twatchs3/include/boards share structural responsibilities in the structural slice boards; candidates include TWatchS3Board and SX1262Access.","docPath":"docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams/boards-twatchs3-include-boards/class-structural-diagram.md","htmlPath":"docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams/boards-twatchs3-include-boards/class-structural-diagram.html","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-twatchs3-include-boards","status":"candidate","confidence":"high","mermaidKind":"classDiagram","mermaid":"classDiagram\n class TWatchS3Board[\"TWatchS3Board\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n class SX1262Access[\"SX1262Access\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n note for TWatchS3Board \"S\"","readingGuide":["This Class / Structural Diagram focuses on the structural slice of boards/twatchs3/include/boards, rather than the entire top-level directory of boards.","It only puts classes, interfaces, enumerations or structural types; method-level high-reference objects will enter Component/Hotspot and will no longer be mixed into the structural collaboration diagram.","The candidate context is \"structural slice boards\". When reading the diagram, first confirm whether these objects jointly carry the same business capabilities, share support mechanisms or adaptation boundaries.","Currently there is not enough evidence of class-level relationships, so the graph only retains candidate slice objects and reduces them to structural candidate perspectives."],"technicalAnalysis":["boards/twatchs3/include/boards currently contains 2 class/structure and 0 interface/trait candidates.","Currently there is a lack of class-level relationship evidence, and objects in the same directory cannot be directly interpreted as stable collaboration.","The explanation goal of this diagram is to structure responsibilities and boundaries: which objects are like domain models, which objects are like interface contracts, and which objects are like strategies/adapters or shared supports.","If the objects in the diagram are in the same directory but have no common business context or structural relationship, the generation process must be split or downgraded to Component/Hotspot instead of continuing to remain as Class/Structural Diagram."],"businessRelation":["This diagram candidate is associated with \"structural slice boards\" and should be connected back to the Class Collaboration, Activity or Sequence drill-down diagram corresponding to the Use Case in the organization/process model.","The software structure model cannot just say \"there are many classes here\", but should explain how these classes make business changes easier or more difficult.","Candidates include: TWatchS3Board, SX1262Access."],"governanceNotes":["Do not think of top-level layers, directory names, or relationship numbers as the interpretation objects of the structure diagram; the structure diagram must be centered around a nameable business/technical context.","When an object is out of the current context, has no relationship description, or is just a highly referenced utility class, it should be removed from the diagram and transferred to Component/Hotspot or shared support slice.","When changing boards/twatchs3/include/boards, simultaneously maintain the reference relationship between it and the related Use Case, Component, and Sequence."],"coverage":["Structural slice: boards/twatchs3/include/boards","Candidate business/technical context: structural slice boards","Project boundary: boards","Number of candidate structure objects: 2","Number of candidate structure relationships: 0","Object: TWatchS3Board (class)","Object: SX1262Access (class)"],"evidencePaths":["boards/twatchs3/include/boards/twatchs3/twatchs3_board.h#L30","boards/twatchs3/include/boards/twatchs3/twatchs3_board.h#L21"],"questions":["This structural slice comes from local warehouse evidence; currently there is not enough Trace evidence found to bind it to the unique business story, so it is only used as a candidate perspective of the software structural model."],"scope":{"packageId":"boards","filePath":"boards/twatchs3/include/boards"},"drilldowns":[{"id":"engineering:diagram:technical-hotspot:dependency-cluster--boards","kind":"technical_hotspot","title":"Dependency cluster: boards technology hotspots","summary":"This module relies on multiple external boundaries and is currently processed as a candidate technology coupling center; only the dependency directions and boundaries that have been observed by warehouse evidence are retained in the figure.","docPath":"docs/engineering/technical-hotspots/dependency-cluster--boards/technical-hotspot.md","htmlPath":"docs/engineering/technical-hotspots/dependency-cluster--boards/technical-hotspot.html","anchor":"engineering:hotspot:dependency-cluster:boards","relation":"risk_detail","reason":"Look at hot spots within the boundaries of the structure to identify which objects, files, or relationship clusters the complexity is concentrated on."}],"elements":[{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-twatchs3-include-boards:element:twatchs3board","mermaidId":"TWatchS3Board","label":"TWatchS3Board","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-twatchs3-include-boards","summary":"TWatchS3Board belongs to the boards/twatchs3/include/boards structural slice, which is used to explain a structural responsibility in the \"structural slice boards\", rather than being put into the diagram because it has a high number of relationships in the boards.","role":"Structure object: Its responsibilities must be explained in combination with Use Case, Sequence or Component drill-down evidence, and cannot be judged solely by name or directory.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/twatchs3/include/boards/twatchs3/twatchs3_board.h, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":"Drill-down TWatchS3Board should verify the specific roles it plays in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to avoid isolated class names being misinterpreted as business explanations.","businessRelevance":"TWatchS3Board is a candidate technology carrier object for \"structural slicing boards\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its service through Trace/Refine links. If the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying TWatchS3Board may affect the structural description in boards/twatchs3/include/boards, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/twatchs3/include/boards/twatchs3/twatchs3_board.h#L30","Structural slice: boards/twatchs3/include/boards","Object type: class","Candidate context: structural slice boards"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-twatchs3-include-boards:element:sx1262access","mermaidId":"SX1262Access","label":"SX1262Access","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-twatchs3-include-boards","summary":"SX1262Access belongs to the boards/twatchs3/include/boards structural slice, which is used to explain a structural responsibility in the \"structural slice boards\", rather than being put into the diagram because it has a high number of relationships in the boards.","role":"Structure object: Its responsibilities must be explained in combination with Use Case, Sequence or Component drill-down evidence, and cannot be judged solely by name or directory.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/twatchs3/include/boards/twatchs3/twatchs3_board.h, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":"Drill-down SX1262Access should verify the specific roles it plays in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to avoid isolated class names being misinterpreted as business explanations.","businessRelevance":"SX1262Access is a candidate technology carrier object for \"structural slicing boards\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its service through Trace/Refine links. If the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying SX1262Access may affect the structural description in boards/twatchs3/include/boards, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/twatchs3/include/boards/twatchs3/twatchs3_board.h#L21","Structural slice: boards/twatchs3/include/boards","Object type: class","Candidate context: structural slice boards"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]}]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-gat562_mesh_evb_pro","kind":"class_structural","title":"Structure collaboration: structure slicing gat562_mesh_evb_pro · gat562_mesh_evb_pro","summary":"Explain how the classes, interfaces, components, or value objects in this structural slice boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro share structural responsibilities in the structural slice gat562_mesh_evb_pro; candidates include Ssd1306MonoDisplay, ScopedGpsSuspend.","docPath":"docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams/boards-gat562_mesh_evb_pro/class-structural-diagram.md","htmlPath":"docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams/boards-gat562_mesh_evb_pro/class-structural-diagram.html","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-gat562_mesh_evb_pro","status":"candidate","confidence":"high","mermaidKind":"classDiagram","mermaid":"classDiagram\n class Ssd1306MonoDisplay[\"Ssd1306MonoDisplay\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n class ScopedGpsSuspend[\"ScopedGpsSuspend\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n note for Ssd1306MonoDisplay \"S\"","readingGuide":["This Class / Structural Diagram focuses on the structural slice of boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro, rather than the entire top-level directory of boards.","It only puts classes, interfaces, enumerations or structural types; method-level high-reference objects will enter Component/Hotspot and will no longer be mixed into the structural collaboration diagram.","The candidate context is \"structure slice gat562_mesh_evb_pro\". When reading the diagram, first confirm whether these objects jointly carry the same business capabilities, share support mechanisms or adaptation boundaries.","Currently there is not enough evidence of class-level relationships, so the graph only retains candidate slice objects and reduces them to structural candidate perspectives."],"technicalAnalysis":["boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro currently contains 2 class/structure and 0 interface/trait candidates.","Currently there is a lack of class-level relationship evidence, and objects in the same directory cannot be directly interpreted as stable collaboration.","The explanation goal of this diagram is to structure responsibilities and boundaries: which objects are like domain models, which objects are like interface contracts, and which objects are like strategies/adapters or shared supports.","If the objects in the diagram are in the same directory but have no common business context or structural relationship, the generation process must be split or downgraded to Component/Hotspot instead of continuing to remain as Class/Structural Diagram."],"businessRelation":["This diagram candidate is associated with \"structural slice gat562_mesh_evb_pro\" and should be connected back to the Class Collaboration, Activity or Sequence drill-down diagram corresponding to the Use Case in the organization/process model.","The software structure model cannot just say \"there are many classes here\", but should explain how these classes make business changes easier or more difficult.","Candidates include: Ssd1306MonoDisplay, ScopedGpsSuspend."],"governanceNotes":["Do not think of top-level layers, directory names, or relationship numbers as the interpretation objects of the structure diagram; the structure diagram must be centered around a nameable business/technical context.","When an object is out of the current context, has no relationship description, or is just a highly referenced utility class, it should be removed from the diagram and transferred to Component/Hotspot or shared support slice.","When changing boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro, simultaneously maintain the reference relationship between it and the related Use Case, Component, and Sequence."],"coverage":["Structure slice: boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro","Candidate business/technical context: structural slicing gat562_mesh_evb_pro","Project boundary: boards","Number of candidate structure objects: 2","Number of candidate structure relationships: 0","Object: Ssd1306MonoDisplay (class)","Object: ScopedGpsSuspend (class)"],"evidencePaths":["boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/src/gat562_board.cpp#L398","boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/src/settings_store.cpp#L80"],"questions":["This structural slice comes from local warehouse evidence; currently there is not enough Trace evidence found to bind it to the unique business story, so it is only used as a candidate perspective of the software structural model."],"scope":{"packageId":"boards","filePath":"boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro"},"drilldowns":[{"id":"engineering:diagram:technical-hotspot:dependency-cluster--boards","kind":"technical_hotspot","title":"Dependency cluster: boards technology hotspots","summary":"This module relies on multiple external boundaries and is currently processed as a candidate technology coupling center; only the dependency directions and boundaries that have been observed by warehouse evidence are retained in the figure.","docPath":"docs/engineering/technical-hotspots/dependency-cluster--boards/technical-hotspot.md","htmlPath":"docs/engineering/technical-hotspots/dependency-cluster--boards/technical-hotspot.html","anchor":"engineering:hotspot:dependency-cluster:boards","relation":"risk_detail","reason":"Look at hot spots within the boundaries of the structure to identify which objects, files, or relationship clusters the complexity is concentrated on."}],"elements":[{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-gat562_mesh_evb_pro:element:ssd1306monodisplay","mermaidId":"Ssd1306MonoDisplay","label":"Ssd1306MonoDisplay","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-gat562_mesh_evb_pro","summary":"Ssd1306MonoDisplay belongs to the boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro structure slice, which is used to explain a structural responsibility in the \"structural slice gat562_mesh_evb_pro\", rather than being put into the graph because it has a high number of relationships in the boards.","role":"Structure object: Its responsibilities must be explained in combination with Use Case, Sequence or Component drill-down evidence, and cannot be judged solely by name or directory.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/src/gat562_board.cpp, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":"Drilling down Ssd1306MonoDisplay should verify the specific role it plays in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to avoid the isolated class name being misinterpreted as a business explanation.","businessRelevance":"Ssd1306MonoDisplay is a candidate technology carrier object for \"structural slicing gat562_mesh_evb_pro\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its service through Trace/Refine links. When the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying Ssd1306MonoDisplay may affect the structure description in boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/src/gat562_board.cpp#L398","Structure slice: boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro","Object type: class","Candidate context: Structural slice gat562_mesh_evb_pro"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-gat562_mesh_evb_pro:element:scopedgpssuspend","mermaidId":"ScopedGpsSuspend","label":"ScopedGpsSuspend","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-gat562_mesh_evb_pro","summary":"ScopedGpsSuspend belongs to the boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro structural slice and is used to explain a structural responsibility in the \"structural slice gat562_mesh_evb_pro\", rather than being put into the graph because it has a high number of relationships in boards.","role":"Structure object: Its responsibilities must be explained in combination with Use Case, Sequence or Component drill-down evidence, and cannot be judged solely by name or directory.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/src/settings_store.cpp, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":"Drill-down ScopedGpsSuspend should verify the specific role it plays in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to prevent isolated class names from being misinterpreted as business explanations.","businessRelevance":"ScopedGpsSuspend is a candidate technology carrier object for \"structural slicing gat562_mesh_evb_pro\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its service through Trace/Refine links. When the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying ScopedGpsSuspend may affect the structure description in boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro/src/settings_store.cpp#L80","Structure slice: boards/gat562_mesh_evb_pro","Object type: class","Candidate context: Structural slice gat562_mesh_evb_pro"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]}]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-t_echo_lite","kind":"class_structural","title":"Structure collaboration: Structural slice t_echo_lite · t_echo_lite","summary":"Explain how the classes, interfaces, components or value objects in the structure slice boards/t_echo_lite share the structural responsibilities in the structure slice t_echo_lite; candidates include EpaperMonoDisplay and ScopedGpsSuspend.","docPath":"docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams/boards-t_echo_lite/class-structural-diagram.md","htmlPath":"docs/engineering/class-structural-diagrams/boards-t_echo_lite/class-structural-diagram.html","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-t_echo_lite","status":"candidate","confidence":"high","mermaidKind":"classDiagram","mermaid":"classDiagram\n class EpaperMonoDisplay[\"EpaperMonoDisplay\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n class ScopedGpsSuspend[\"ScopedGpsSuspend\"] {\n <<class>>\n }\n note for EpaperMonoDisplay \"S\"","readingGuide":["This Class / Structural Diagram focuses on the structural slice boards/t_echo_lite, rather than the entire top-level directory of boards.","It only puts classes, interfaces, enumerations or structural types; method-level high-reference objects will enter Component/Hotspot and will no longer be mixed into the structural collaboration diagram.","The candidate context is \"structural slice t_echo_lite\". When reading the diagram, first confirm whether these objects jointly carry the same business capabilities, share support mechanisms or adaptation boundaries.","Currently there is not enough evidence of class-level relationships, so the graph only retains candidate slice objects and reduces them to structural candidate perspectives."],"technicalAnalysis":["boards/t_echo_lite currently contains 2 class/structure and 0 interface/trait candidates.","Currently there is a lack of class-level relationship evidence, and objects in the same directory cannot be directly interpreted as stable collaboration.","The explanation goal of this diagram is to structure responsibilities and boundaries: which objects are like domain models, which objects are like interface contracts, and which objects are like strategies/adapters or shared supports.","If the objects in the diagram are in the same directory but have no common business context or structural relationship, the generation process must be split or downgraded to Component/Hotspot instead of continuing to remain as Class/Structural Diagram."],"businessRelation":["This diagram candidate is associated with \"structural slice t_echo_lite\" and should be connected back to the Class Collaboration, Activity or Sequence drill-down diagram corresponding to the Use Case in the organization/process model.","The software structure model cannot just say \"there are many classes here\", but should explain how these classes make business changes easier or more difficult.","Candidates include: EpaperMonoDisplay, ScopedGpsSuspend."],"governanceNotes":["Do not think of top-level layers, directory names, or relationship numbers as the interpretation objects of the structure diagram; the structure diagram must be centered around a nameable business/technical context.","When an object is out of the current context, has no relationship description, or is just a highly referenced utility class, it should be removed from the diagram and transferred to Component/Hotspot or shared support slice.","When changing boards/t_echo_lite, the reference relationship between it and the related Use Case, Component, and Sequence is synchronously maintained."],"coverage":["Structural slice: boards/t_echo_lite","Candidate business/technical context: Structural slice t_echo_lite","Project boundary: boards","Number of candidate structure objects: 2","Number of candidate structure relationships: 0","Object: EpaperMonoDisplay (class)","Object: ScopedGpsSuspend (class)"],"evidencePaths":["boards/t_echo_lite/src/t_echo_lite_board.cpp#L856","boards/t_echo_lite/src/settings_store.cpp#L95"],"questions":["This structural slice comes from local warehouse evidence; currently there is not enough Trace evidence found to bind it to the unique business story, so it is only used as a candidate perspective of the software structural model."],"scope":{"packageId":"boards","filePath":"boards/t_echo_lite"},"drilldowns":[{"id":"engineering:diagram:component:boards-makeboardprofile","kind":"component","title":"Function node: makeBoardProfile","summary":"function is located at boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/board_profile.h#L188, coordinates multiple external objects or capabilities, and is used to explain technical collaboration and change impact areas.","docPath":"docs/engineering/component-diagrams/boards-makeboardprofile/component-diagram.md","htmlPath":"docs/engineering/component-diagrams/boards-makeboardprofile/component-diagram.html","anchor":"engineering:component:function:makeboardprofile:boards-t_echo_lite-include-boards-t_echo_lite-board_profile.h:188","relation":"realized_by","reason":"Open the component perspective of the function node: makeBoardProfile to verify whether the object role in the structure diagram is supported by the file anchor boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/board_profile.h, the referenced/called relationship and the downstream relationship evidence."},{"id":"engineering:diagram:component:boards-pinnum","kind":"component","title":"Function node: pinNum","summary":"The function is located in boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/board_profile.h#L8. It is reused or relied on by multiple objects and is used to explain technical collaboration and change impact.","docPath":"docs/engineering/component-diagrams/boards-pinnum/component-diagram.md","htmlPath":"docs/engineering/component-diagrams/boards-pinnum/component-diagram.html","anchor":"engineering:component:function:pinnum:boards-t_echo_lite-include-boards-t_echo_lite-board_profile.h:8","relation":"realized_by","reason":"Open the component perspective of function node: pinNum to verify whether the object role in the structure diagram is supported by the file anchor boards/t_echo_lite/include/boards/t_echo_lite/board_profile.h, the referenced/called relationship and the downstream relationship evidence."},{"id":"engineering:diagram:technical-hotspot:dependency-cluster--boards","kind":"technical_hotspot","title":"Dependency cluster: boards technology hotspots","summary":"This module relies on multiple external boundaries and is currently processed as a candidate technology coupling center; only the dependency directions and boundaries that have been observed by warehouse evidence are retained in the figure.","docPath":"docs/engineering/technical-hotspots/dependency-cluster--boards/technical-hotspot.md","htmlPath":"docs/engineering/technical-hotspots/dependency-cluster--boards/technical-hotspot.html","anchor":"engineering:hotspot:dependency-cluster:boards","relation":"risk_detail","reason":"Look at hot spots within the boundaries of the structure to identify which objects, files, or relationship clusters the complexity is concentrated on."}],"elements":[{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-t_echo_lite:element:epapermonodisplay","mermaidId":"EpaperMonoDisplay","label":"EpaperMonoDisplay","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-t_echo_lite","summary":"EpaperMonoDisplay belongs to the boards/t_echo_lite structure slice, which is used to explain a structural responsibility in the \"structural slice t_echo_lite\", rather than being put into the graph because it has a high number of relationships in the boards.","role":"Structure object: Its responsibilities must be explained in combination with Use Case, Sequence or Component drill-down evidence, and cannot be judged solely by name or directory.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/t_echo_lite/src/t_echo_lite_board.cpp, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":"Drilling down EpaperMonoDisplay should verify the specific roles it plays in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to avoid isolated class names being misinterpreted as business explanations.","businessRelevance":"EpaperMonoDisplay is a candidate technology carrier object of \"structural slicing t_echo_lite\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its service through Trace/Refine links. When the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying EpaperMonoDisplay may affect the structural description in boards/t_echo_lite, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/t_echo_lite/src/t_echo_lite_board.cpp#L856","Structural slice: boards/t_echo_lite","Object type: class","Candidate context: Structural slice t_echo_lite"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:class-structural:boards-t_echo_lite:element:scopedgpssuspend","mermaidId":"ScopedGpsSuspend","label":"ScopedGpsSuspend","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:class-structural:boards-t_echo_lite","summary":"ScopedGpsSuspend belongs to the boards/t_echo_lite structural slice and is used to explain a structural responsibility in \"structural slice t_echo_lite\", rather than being put into the graph because it has a high number of relationships in boards.","role":"Structure object: Its responsibilities must be explained in combination with Use Case, Sequence or Component drill-down evidence, and cannot be judged solely by name or directory.","whyItExists":"It is located in boards/t_echo_lite/src/settings_store.cpp, and is in the same source code context as other classes/interfaces in the same slice; this context is closer to the real business or architectural boundary than the top-level directory boards.","relationshipMeaning":"The same slice relationship in the diagram represents the collaboration boundary of the candidate structure; only when there is evidence of interface implementation, inheritance, composition, strategy or port, it should be further marked as a clear design relationship.","drilldownIntent":"Drill-down ScopedGpsSuspend should verify the specific role it plays in Component, Sequence, and Use Case Class Collaboration to prevent isolated class names from being misinterpreted as business explanations.","businessRelevance":"ScopedGpsSuspend is the candidate technology carrier object of \"structural slice t_echo_lite\"; the current document explains the triggering conditions, processes or rules of its service through Trace/Refine links. When the evidence is insufficient, the confidence level will be reduced or the coverage will be reduced.","changeImpact":"Modifying ScopedGpsSuspend may affect the structure description in boards/t_echo_lite, and you should check whether the relevant Design/Engineering/Architecture documents are still consistent.","evidence":["boards/t_echo_lite/src/settings_store.cpp#L95","Structural slice: boards/t_echo_lite","Object type: class","Candidate context: Structural slice t_echo_lite"],"risks":["The current slice comes from local warehouse evidence and path context inference; the objects in the graph must be able to explain the same structural context, otherwise the generation process will be split or degraded."],"questions":[],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]}]}]}]}</script>
|
|
</main>
|
|
</body>
|
|
</html> |