dandri/trail-mate
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/vicliu624/trail-mate.git synced 2026-08-29 07:08:27 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
Files
main
trail-mate/docs/engineering/sequence-diagrams/tick-calls-log_loop_interval/sequence-diagram.html
T

160 lines
21 KiB
HTML
Raw Permalink Blame History

<!doctype html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8" />
<title>Dynamic collaboration: tick calls log_loop_interval</title>
</head>
<body>
<main class="praxis-engineering-map" data-praxis-anchor="engineering:runtime-flow:tick:log_loop_interval:apps-esp32_lvgl-src-esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp:apps-esp32_lvgl-src-esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp" data-praxis-kind="engineering_sequence_diagram" data-praxis-status="candidate" data-praxis-confidence="high" data-praxis-document-path="docs/engineering/sequence-diagrams/tick-calls-log_loop_interval/sequence-diagram.html" data-praxis-drilldowns="[]">
<header class="praxis-design-map-header">
<p>Praxis Software Structure Model</p>
<h1>Dynamic collaboration: tick calls log_loop_interval</h1>
<p>Tick calls in apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp log_loop_interval in apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp.</p>
<div class="meta-row">
<span>Sequence Diagrams</span>
<span>candidate / high</span>
<span>0.1.0 · 34aad0bffa2f / main</span>
</div>
</header>
<section class="semantic-layer" data-praxis-anchor="engineering:reading-guide" data-praxis-kind="engineering_document_section">
<h2>How to read the diagram</h2>
<ul>
<li>This Sequence Diagram focuses on the technical collaboration fragment of tick calling log_loop_interval.</li>
<li>It describes a partial operation segment and is not necessarily equivalent to the complete business process.</li>
<li>The current relationship comes from local call evidence; without Use Case Trace, it only represents a local collaboration fragment and is not directly equivalent to the main success scenario, callback, compensation or failure path.</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section class="semantic-layer" data-praxis-anchor="engineering:technical-analysis" data-praxis-kind="engineering_document_section">
<h2>Technical complexity analysis</h2>
<ul>
<li>There is a calls relationship between apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp and apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp, and the technical boundary is apps/esp32_lvgl.</li>
<li>Sequence Diagram is used to explain runtime or collaboration sequences, and is suitable for undertaking dynamic behaviors that are not clearly visible from the Package/Component diagram.</li>
<li>If future evidence shows that there are asynchronous messages, callbacks, timeouts or failure compensation, multiple sequences should be broken out for the same business/technical scenario rather than crammed into one big picture.</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section class="semantic-layer" data-praxis-anchor="engineering:business-relation" data-praxis-kind="engineering_document_section">
<h2>Relationship with business complexity</h2>
<ul>
<li>The main success path, failure path and callback path of the business Use Case will eventually fall on several technical sequence fragments.</li>
<li>The current fragment may explain the technical execution steps in a certain business story; if there is no Use Case Trace, it only serves as a local collaboration fragment in the software structure model.</li>
<li>If it is confirmed to belong to a Use Case, the project sequence document should be linked to the corresponding drill-down Sequence Diagram in docs/design.</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section class="semantic-layer" data-praxis-anchor="engineering:governance-notes" data-praxis-kind="engineering_document_section">
<h2>Governance Suggestions</h2>
<ul>
<li>Don't just judge the complete call chain based on a single relationship; you need to combine the upstream and downstream relationships to complete the scenario.</li>
<li>When the sequence involves external systems, model calls, file writing, or Git operations, failure paths and retry/compensation instructions should be added.</li>
<li>If the sequence supports user-visible functions, the business drill-down diagram of the organization/process model should be maintained simultaneously.</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section class="semantic-layer diagram-section" data-praxis-anchor="engineering:diagram-body" data-praxis-kind="engineering_diagram_body">
<h2>UML/Technical Diagram</h2>
<pre class="mermaid" data-praxis-anchor="engineering:runtime-flow:tick:log_loop_interval:apps-esp32_lvgl-src-esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp:apps-esp32_lvgl-src-esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp:uml" data-praxis-kind="engineering_sequence_uml" data-praxis-drilldowns="[]">sequenceDiagram
participant Source as tick
participant Target as log_loop_interval
Source-&gt;&gt;Target: calls
Note over Source,Target: apps/esp32_lvgl</pre>
</section>
<section class="semantic-layer" data-praxis-anchor="engineering:coverage" data-praxis-kind="engineering_document_section">
<h2>Coverage</h2>
<ul>
<li>Interaction type: calls</li>
<li>Source: apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp</li>
<li>Target: apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp</li>
<li>Official module: apps/esp32_lvgl</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section class="semantic-layer engineering-element-drilldowns" data-praxis-anchor="engineering:runtime-flow:tick:log_loop_interval:apps-esp32_lvgl-src-esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp:apps-esp32_lvgl-src-esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp:element-drilldowns" data-praxis-kind="engineering_element_drilldown_index">
<h2>Drill-down of semantic elements in the diagram</h2>
<ol>
<li data-praxis-anchor="engineering:runtime-flow:tick:log_loop_interval:apps-esp32_lvgl-src-esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp:apps-esp32_lvgl-src-esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp:source" data-praxis-kind="engineering_uml_element" data-praxis-mermaid-id="Source" data-praxis-drilldowns="[]">
<strong>tick</strong>
<span>component</span>
<p>tick is the source participant of the current Sequence Diagram, used to explain the tick calls in apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp log_loop_interval in apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp.</p>
<dl>
<div><dt>Technical role</dt><dd>Message originator/relying party: It triggers or references the target capability.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Why it appears</dt><dd>Local repository evidence calls were observed between apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp and apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp, so the tick was put into sequence.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Relationship meaning</dt><dd>tick -> log_loop_interval indicates the dependency direction of the current fragment; if the relationship is only import, it can only indicate static dependencies and cannot directly prove the runtime order.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Drill-down intention</dt><dd>Drill-down tick can view the corresponding Component Diagram or structural context to determine the responsibilities of this participant within the larger technical boundary.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Business association</dt><dd>The execution process of the business Use Case may fall on multiple sequence fragments; the current fragment is only a candidate technical step and requires organizational/process model evidence to confirm the business meaning.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Impact of change</dt><dd>Modifying apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp may change the sequence's dependencies, calling evidence, and interpretation of related component/structure diagrams.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Confidence</dt><dd>high</dd></div>
</dl>
<section><h3>Evidence</h3>
<ul>
<li>apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp</li>
<li>Interaction type: calls</li>
<li>Source: apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp</li>
<li>Target: apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp</li>
<li>Official module: apps/esp32_lvgl</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section><h3>Risk</h3>
<ul>
<li>A single sequence fragment is not enough to prove the complete call chain or the successful path of the business owner.</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section><h3>Problem</h3>
<ul>
<li>The current relationship type needs to be distinguished by evidence between runtime calls, static imports, type references, or configuration references; if it is only a static relationship, this diagram should not be interpreted as a real calling sequence.</li>
</ul>
</section>
</li>
<li data-praxis-anchor="engineering:runtime-flow:tick:log_loop_interval:apps-esp32_lvgl-src-esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp:apps-esp32_lvgl-src-esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp:target" data-praxis-kind="engineering_uml_element" data-praxis-mermaid-id="Target" data-praxis-drilldowns="[]">
<strong>log_loop_interval</strong>
<span>component</span>
<p>log_loop_interval is the target actor of the current Sequence Diagram and is used to interpret tick calls log_loop_interval in apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp.</p>
<dl>
<div><dt>Technical role</dt><dd>Message receiving/relying party: It provides the ability to be referenced or called by the current fragment.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Why it appears</dt><dd>Local repository evidence calls were observed between apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp and apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp, so log_loop_interval was put into sequence.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Relationship meaning</dt><dd>tick -> log_loop_interval indicates that the target capability is dependent on the current fragment; it needs to be combined with the call evidence to confirm whether it is a runtime call, a type reference or a static import.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Drill-down intention</dt><dd>Drilling down log_loop_interval can view the corresponding Component Diagram or structural context to determine the responsibilities of this participant in the larger technical boundary.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Business association</dt><dd>The execution process of the business Use Case may fall on multiple sequence fragments; the current fragment is only a candidate technical step and requires organizational/process model evidence to confirm the business meaning.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Impact of change</dt><dd>Modifying apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp may change the sequence's dependencies, calling evidence, and interpretation of related component/structure diagrams.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Confidence</dt><dd>high</dd></div>
</dl>
<section><h3>Evidence</h3>
<ul>
<li>apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp</li>
<li>Interaction type: calls</li>
<li>Source: apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp</li>
<li>Target: apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp</li>
<li>Official module: apps/esp32_lvgl</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section><h3>Risk</h3>
<ul>
<li>A single sequence fragment is not enough to prove the complete call chain or the successful path of the business owner.</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section><h3>Problem</h3>
<ul>
<li>The current relationship type needs to be distinguished by evidence between runtime calls, static imports, type references, or configuration references; if it is only a static relationship, this diagram should not be interpreted as a real calling sequence.</li>
</ul>
</section>
</li>
</ol>
</section>
<section class="semantic-layer engineering-drilldowns" data-praxis-anchor="engineering:runtime-flow:tick:log_loop_interval:apps-esp32_lvgl-src-esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp:apps-esp32_lvgl-src-esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp:drilldowns" data-praxis-kind="engineering_drilldown_options" data-praxis-drilldowns="[]">
<h2>Drill-down UML</h2>
<p>There is currently no evidence-based link to a finer picture.</p>
</section>
<section class="semantic-layer" data-praxis-anchor="engineering:evidence" data-praxis-kind="engineering_document_section">
<h2>Evidence</h2>
<ul>
<li>apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp</li>
<li>apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section class="semantic-layer" data-praxis-anchor="engineering:questions" data-praxis-kind="engineering_document_section">
<h2>Problem</h2>
<ul>
<li>There are no open issues yet.</li>
</ul>
</section>
<script type="application/json" id="praxis-engineering-diagram-document">{"id":"engineering:diagram:sequence:tick-calls-log_loop_interval","kind":"sequence","title":"Dynamic collaboration: tick calls log_loop_interval","summary":"Tick calls in apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp log_loop_interval in apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp.","docPath":"docs/engineering/sequence-diagrams/tick-calls-log_loop_interval/sequence-diagram.md","htmlPath":"docs/engineering/sequence-diagrams/tick-calls-log_loop_interval/sequence-diagram.html","anchor":"engineering:runtime-flow:tick:log_loop_interval:apps-esp32_lvgl-src-esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp:apps-esp32_lvgl-src-esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp","status":"candidate","confidence":"high","mermaidKind":"sequenceDiagram","mermaid":"sequenceDiagram\n participant Source as tick\n participant Target as log_loop_interval\n Source->>Target: calls\n Note over Source,Target: apps/esp32_lvgl","readingGuide":["This Sequence Diagram focuses on the technical collaboration fragment of tick calling log_loop_interval.","It describes a partial operation segment and is not necessarily equivalent to the complete business process.","The current relationship comes from local call evidence; without Use Case Trace, it only represents a local collaboration fragment and is not directly equivalent to the main success scenario, callback, compensation or failure path."],"technicalAnalysis":["There is a calls relationship between apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp and apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp, and the technical boundary is apps/esp32_lvgl.","Sequence Diagram is used to explain runtime or collaboration sequences, and is suitable for undertaking dynamic behaviors that are not clearly visible from the Package/Component diagram.","If future evidence shows that there are asynchronous messages, callbacks, timeouts or failure compensation, multiple sequences should be broken out for the same business/technical scenario rather than crammed into one big picture."],"businessRelation":["The main success path, failure path and callback path of the business Use Case will eventually fall on several technical sequence fragments.","The current fragment may explain the technical execution steps in a certain business story; if there is no Use Case Trace, it only serves as a local collaboration fragment in the software structure model.","If it is confirmed to belong to a Use Case, the project sequence document should be linked to the corresponding drill-down Sequence Diagram in docs/design."],"governanceNotes":["Don't just judge the complete call chain based on a single relationship; you need to combine the upstream and downstream relationships to complete the scenario.","When the sequence involves external systems, model calls, file writing, or Git operations, failure paths and retry/compensation instructions should be added.","If the sequence supports user-visible functions, the business drill-down diagram of the organization/process model should be maintained simultaneously."],"coverage":["Interaction type: calls","Source: apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp","Target: apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp","Official module: apps/esp32_lvgl"],"evidencePaths":["apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp","apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp"],"questions":[],"scope":{"packageId":"apps/esp32_lvgl","sourcePath":"apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp","targetPath":"apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp","targetPackageId":"apps/esp32_lvgl","sourceName":"tick","targetName":"log_loop_interval"},"drilldowns":[],"elements":[{"id":"engineering:diagram:sequence:tick-calls-log_loop_interval:element:tick","mermaidId":"Source","label":"tick","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:runtime-flow:tick:log_loop_interval:apps-esp32_lvgl-src-esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp:apps-esp32_lvgl-src-esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp:source","summary":"tick is the source participant of the current Sequence Diagram, used to explain the tick calls in apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp log_loop_interval in apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp.","role":"Message originator/relying party: It triggers or references the target capability.","whyItExists":"Local repository evidence calls were observed between apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp and apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp, so the tick was put into sequence.","relationshipMeaning":"tick -> log_loop_interval indicates the dependency direction of the current fragment; if the relationship is only import, it can only indicate static dependencies and cannot directly prove the runtime order.","drilldownIntent":"Drill-down tick can view the corresponding Component Diagram or structural context to determine the responsibilities of this participant within the larger technical boundary.","businessRelevance":"The execution process of the business Use Case may fall on multiple sequence fragments; the current fragment is only a candidate technical step and requires organizational/process model evidence to confirm the business meaning.","changeImpact":"Modifying apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp may change the sequence's dependencies, calling evidence, and interpretation of related component/structure diagrams.","evidence":["apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp","Interaction type: calls","Source: apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp","Target: apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp","Official module: apps/esp32_lvgl"],"risks":["A single sequence fragment is not enough to prove the complete call chain or the successful path of the business owner."],"questions":["The current relationship type needs to be distinguished by evidence between runtime calls, static imports, type references, or configuration references; if it is only a static relationship, this diagram should not be interpreted as a real calling sequence."],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]},{"id":"engineering:diagram:sequence:tick-calls-log_loop_interval:element:log_loop_interval","mermaidId":"Target","label":"log_loop_interval","kind":"component","anchor":"engineering:runtime-flow:tick:log_loop_interval:apps-esp32_lvgl-src-esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp:apps-esp32_lvgl-src-esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp:target","summary":"log_loop_interval is the target actor of the current Sequence Diagram and is used to interpret tick calls log_loop_interval in apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp.","role":"Message receiving/relying party: It provides the ability to be referenced or called by the current fragment.","whyItExists":"Local repository evidence calls were observed between apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp and apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp, so log_loop_interval was put into sequence.","relationshipMeaning":"tick -> log_loop_interval indicates that the target capability is dependent on the current fragment; it needs to be combined with the call evidence to confirm whether it is a runtime call, a type reference or a static import.","drilldownIntent":"Drilling down log_loop_interval can view the corresponding Component Diagram or structural context to determine the responsibilities of this participant in the larger technical boundary.","businessRelevance":"The execution process of the business Use Case may fall on multiple sequence fragments; the current fragment is only a candidate technical step and requires organizational/process model evidence to confirm the business meaning.","changeImpact":"Modifying apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp may change the sequence's dependencies, calling evidence, and interpretation of related component/structure diagrams.","evidence":["apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp","Interaction type: calls","Source: apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp","Target: apps/esp32_lvgl/src/esp32_lvgl_arduino_loop_runtime.cpp","Official module: apps/esp32_lvgl"],"risks":["A single sequence fragment is not enough to prove the complete call chain or the successful path of the business owner."],"questions":["The current relationship type needs to be distinguished by evidence between runtime calls, static imports, type references, or configuration references; if it is only a static relationship, this diagram should not be interpreted as a real calling sequence."],"confidence":"high","drilldowns":[]}]}</script>
</main>
</body>
</html>
Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink