mirror of
https://forgejo.ellis.link/continuwuation/continuwuity/
synced 2026-10-06 09:37:26 +00:00
style: Run formatting
This commit is contained in:
@@ -305,8 +305,8 @@ pub(crate) async fn upgrade_room_route(
|
||||
return Err!(Request(Forbidden("Upgrading the admin room this way is not allowed.")));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// 1. Check that the user has permission to send m.room.tombstone events in the
|
||||
// room.
|
||||
// 1. Check that the user has permission to send m.room.tombstone events in
|
||||
// the room.
|
||||
let old_room_state_lock = services.rooms.state.mutex.lock(body.room_id.as_str()).await;
|
||||
|
||||
// Check tombstone permission by attempting to create (but not send) the
|
||||
@@ -556,8 +556,8 @@ pub(crate) async fn upgrade_room_route(
|
||||
)?;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// 5. Send a `m.room.tombstone` event to the old room to indicate that it is not
|
||||
// intended to be used any further.
|
||||
// 5. Send a `m.room.tombstone` event to the old room to indicate that it is
|
||||
// not intended to be used any further.
|
||||
debug!(target=?body.room_id, "Sending tombstone to old room");
|
||||
services
|
||||
.rooms
|
||||
@@ -598,7 +598,8 @@ pub(crate) async fn upgrade_room_route(
|
||||
power_levels.events_default = new_level;
|
||||
power_levels.invite = new_level;
|
||||
|
||||
// 6. Modify the power levels in the old room to prevent sending of events and
|
||||
// 6. Modify the power levels in the old room to prevent sending of events
|
||||
// and
|
||||
// inviting new users
|
||||
// Spec dictates that this is allowed to fail.
|
||||
debug!(target=?body.room_id, ?new_level, "Raising power level in old room to lock it");
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -74,8 +74,8 @@ pub(super) async fn load_left_room(
|
||||
|
||||
// return early if:
|
||||
// - this is an initial sync and the room filter doesn't include leaves, or
|
||||
// - this is an incremental sync, and we've already synced the leave, and the
|
||||
// room filter doesn't include leaves
|
||||
// - this is an incremental sync, and we've already synced the leave, and
|
||||
// the room filter doesn't include leaves
|
||||
if last_sync_end_count.is_none_or(|last_sync_end_count| last_sync_end_count >= left_count)
|
||||
&& !filter.room.include_leave
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -763,8 +763,8 @@ struct GetThirdPartyInvite {
|
||||
Ok(match target_membership {
|
||||
| MembershipState::Join => {
|
||||
trace!("starting target_membership=join check");
|
||||
// 1. If the only previous event is an m.room.create and the state_key is the
|
||||
// creator,
|
||||
// 1. If the only previous event is an m.room.create and the
|
||||
// state_key is the creator,
|
||||
// allow
|
||||
let mut prev_events = current_event.prev_events();
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1052,8 +1052,8 @@ struct GetThirdPartyInvite {
|
||||
allow
|
||||
},
|
||||
| MembershipState::Knock if room_version.authorization.knocking => {
|
||||
// 1. If the `join_rule` is anything other than `knock` or `knock_restricted`,
|
||||
// reject.
|
||||
// 1. If the `join_rule` is anything other than `knock` or
|
||||
// `knock_restricted`, reject.
|
||||
if !matches!(join_rules, JoinRule::KnockRestricted(_) | JoinRule::Knock) {
|
||||
warn!(
|
||||
"Join rule is not set to knock or knock_restricted, knocking is not allowed"
|
||||
@@ -1062,8 +1062,8 @@ struct GetThirdPartyInvite {
|
||||
} else if matches!(join_rules, JoinRule::KnockRestricted(_))
|
||||
&& !room_version.authorization.knock_restricted_join_rule
|
||||
{
|
||||
// 2. If the `join_rule` is `knock_restricted`, but the room does not support
|
||||
// `knock_restricted`, reject.
|
||||
// 2. If the `join_rule` is `knock_restricted`, but the room
|
||||
// does not support `knock_restricted`, reject.
|
||||
warn!(
|
||||
"Join rule is set to knock_restricted but room version does not support \
|
||||
knock_restricted, knocking is not allowed"
|
||||
@@ -1081,8 +1081,8 @@ struct GetThirdPartyInvite {
|
||||
sender_membership,
|
||||
MembershipState::Ban | MembershipState::Invite | MembershipState::Join
|
||||
) {
|
||||
// 4. If the `sender`'s current membership is not `ban`, `invite`, or `join`,
|
||||
// allow.
|
||||
// 4. If the `sender`'s current membership is not `ban`,
|
||||
// `invite`, or `join`, allow.
|
||||
// 5. Otherwise, reject.
|
||||
warn!(
|
||||
?target_user_membership_event_id,
|
||||
@@ -1175,11 +1175,12 @@ fn check_power_levels(
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// - If any of the keys users_default, events_default, state_default, ban,
|
||||
// redact, kick, or invite in content are present and not an integer, reject.
|
||||
// - If either of the keys events or notifications in content are present and
|
||||
// not a dictionary with values that are integers, reject.
|
||||
// - If users key in content is not a dictionary with keys that are valid user
|
||||
// IDs with values that are integers, reject.
|
||||
// redact, kick, or invite in content are present and not an integer,
|
||||
// reject.
|
||||
// - If either of the keys events or notifications in content are present
|
||||
// and not a dictionary with values that are integers, reject.
|
||||
// - If users key in content is not a dictionary with keys that are valid
|
||||
// user IDs with values that are integers, reject.
|
||||
let user_content: RoomPowerLevelsEventContent =
|
||||
deserialize_power_levels(power_event.content().get(), room_version)?;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -142,8 +142,8 @@ pub fn mark_healthy(&self, server_name: &ServerName) -> bool {
|
||||
|
||||
/// Returns a rate-limited error if the remote is unhealthy.
|
||||
fn ensure_remote_is_healthy(&self, server_name: &ServerName) -> Result<()> {
|
||||
// Read the backoff window once. The remote can be marked healthy between two
|
||||
// lookups.
|
||||
// Read the backoff window once. The remote can be marked healthy
|
||||
// between two lookups.
|
||||
let Some(retry_after) = self
|
||||
.retry_after(server_name)
|
||||
.filter(|retry_after| !retry_after.is_zero())
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -161,8 +161,8 @@ pub async fn handle_outlier_pdu<'a, Pdu>(
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// 4. Reject "due to auth events" if the event doesn't pass auth based on the
|
||||
// claimed auth events
|
||||
// 4. Reject "due to auth events" if the event doesn't pass auth based
|
||||
// on the claimed auth events
|
||||
debug!("Checking based on auth events");
|
||||
let mut auth_events_by_key: HashMap<_, _> = HashMap::with_capacity(auth_events.len());
|
||||
// Build map of auth events
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -433,8 +433,9 @@ fn should_attempt_send(
|
||||
},
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Only claim the destination if we are actually going to send. A status
|
||||
// inserted here without a transaction being queued is never cleared.
|
||||
// Only claim the destination if we are actually going to send. A
|
||||
// status inserted here without a transaction being queued is
|
||||
// never cleared.
|
||||
if allow {
|
||||
trace!("Inserting running status for {dest:?}");
|
||||
entry.or_insert(TransactionStatus::Running);
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user