* speed up track publication
Add metrics for track publication and subscription
Return EnabledCodecs in JoinResponse so client can
choose codec without server side codec fallback
Cache remote webrtc track without AddTrackRequest to
let client send publisher offer before AddTrackRequest response
* go mod
* clean code
There are cases where the very first packet on resume is an out-of-order
packet. In that case, the gap in both sequence number and time stamp is
a small(ish) negative number. With a high threshold to declare very old
packet, the condition does not trip and the packet gets through and
treated as a packet that has rolled over.
It should be fine to have smaller threshold (in fact, it is probably
okay to have something a little over 1.0 too) as the expected jump is
calculated based on elapsed time since last packet receive and new
packets should be coming in with a diff close to that. So, a factor of
just over 1.0 to prevent false triggers should be fine. Using 1.5 for
now.
* Handle another old packet condition.
With this detection, the sequence number can be rolled over even when TS
rollover is not possible. For example, a track at 300 pps can rollver
the sequence number space in minutes compared to 13h+ for video time
stamp to roll over.
* fix typo
* Refactor propagation delay estimator.
NOTE: It is not possible to calculate OWD (one-way-delay) in a passive
fashion. So, this should not be used for anything requiring high
precision.
But, mainly factoring it out as a separate object just in case it can be
re-used.
TODO:
- probably has some edge case that is not handled well
- maybe path change detection can be improved
- will write UT later. This is just purely splitting it out from what
was embedded in RTPStatsReceiver.
* fix labels
* precision -> accuracy
* Reset DD tracker layers when muted.
@cnderrauber, I think this is okay to do, but please let me know if
there are gotchas in there.
* copy
* more compact form
This allows listing, adding and deleting agent dispatches on an existing room. Requests go to a new AgentDispatchService, which sends them over RPC to the rtc.Room via the RoomManager. The rtc.Room then does agent job management using RPCs to the agent service.
It is possible that old packets arrive on receiver. If subscriber starts
on that, the first packet time would be incorrect. Do not start
forwarding on out-of-order packets.
* select the least loaded agent worker for job dispatch
* update to load balance using inverse load
* remove unused file
* adding unit tests for worker job distribution
There are cases of small negative sequence number jump and small
positive time stamp jump. Those should not force rollover. Maybe, they
should be dropped, but just logging for now till we learn more.
* Fix forced rollover of RTP time stamp.
Was erroneously forcing a rollover when the timestamp jump actually has
room to accommodate large jumps. For example, before pause ts = 10, then
eight hour pause, restart ts = 10 + (8 * 00 * 60 * 90000) = 2592000010
(at 90000 clock rate for video). In normal processing, it will look like
out-of-order as the difference 2592000000 is more than half the 32-bit
range. But, forcing a roll over is incorrect.
Fix by calculating excess over the full range and then account for wrap
around.
* log potential ts rollover
* clamp at min 0
* Ignore really old packets.
There are cases where really old packets (time stamp is way back, but
sequence number looks like it is moving forward) which cause the
sequence number to update incorrectly. Drop those packets are they are
very old.
* test
- Store agent dispaches independently of room agents on rtc.Room
- Serialize agent dispatches in rtc.Room
- Support for agent dispatch and job serialization in redis
The agent Job object references denormalized Room and ParticipantInfo object. When storing Jobs, this sets the Room to nil, and only stores the Participant identity field. When read back, these fields need to be set to their current value.
* Rollover sequence number when time stamp is moving forward.
Seeing large gaps in sequence number due to potential network issues.
In that gap, the sequence number could roll over.
Using packet time jumps to figure out if a roll over could have happened
and force roll over the sequence number to ensure that it does not flow
backwards.
* fix test
Seeing cases of huge jumps in sender erport rtp time stamp
(of the order of minutes) a few hundred ms after start of track.
Only less than 20 packets have been published at that time as seen by
server. Adding these to sender report to check if client thinks it has
sent much more.
cnderrauber