dandri/trail-mate
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/vicliu624/trail-mate.git synced 2026-08-25 12:09:44 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
Files
main
trail-mate/docs/architecture/c4/code/apps-linux_sim_shell/code.html
T

227 lines
56 KiB
HTML
Raw Permalink Blame History

<!doctype html>
<html lang="en">
<head><meta charset="utf-8" /><title>Code anchor: apps/linux_sim_shell</title></head>
<body>
<main class="praxis-architecture-map" data-praxis-anchor="architecture:c4:code:apps-linux_sim_shell" data-praxis-kind="architecture_c4_code" data-praxis-status="candidate" data-praxis-confidence="medium" data-praxis-document-path="docs/architecture/c4/code/apps-linux_sim_shell/code.html" data-praxis-drilldowns="[]">
<header class="praxis-design-map-header">
<p>Praxis Architecture View</p>
<h1>Code anchor: apps/linux_sim_shell</h1>
<p>Explain a few key code anchors in apps/linux_sim_shell from the C4 Code layer. The Code layer is not a code browser and is only used when you need to understand how architectural components fall into specific files/symbols.</p>
<div class="meta-row">
<span>Code</span>
<span>candidate / medium</span>
<span>0.1.30-alpha · 34aad0bffa2f / main</span>
</div>
</header>
<section class="semantic-layer" data-praxis-anchor="architecture:c4:layer-path" data-praxis-kind="architecture_c4_list">
<h2>C4 hierarchy path</h2>
<ul>
<li>Current layer: Code View, explaining how the upper-layer Component falls to a specific file, function, class, interface or component anchor point.</li>
<li>Upper layer: Component, describing the component responsibilities that these code anchors serve together.</li>
<li>Lower layer: None; when continuing to understand the details, you should return to the IDE, code preview, or software structure model, rather than using Code View as a complete source code browser.</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section class="semantic-layer" data-praxis-anchor="architecture:c4:responsibility" data-praxis-kind="architecture_c4_text">
<h2>Responsibility</h2>
<p> Further reduce the architectural components of apps/linux_sim_shell to specific files, functions, classes, interfaces or component anchors to help users understand the implementation entry and the impact of changes.</p>
</section>
<section class="semantic-layer" data-praxis-anchor="architecture:c4:boundary" data-praxis-kind="architecture_c4_text">
<h2>Boundary</h2>
<p>Code View only displays necessary anchor points and does not list the full source code; the complete structural explanation, code snippets and complexity candidate points should still be viewed back to the software structure model or IDE.</p>
</section>
<section class="semantic-layer" data-praxis-anchor="architecture:c4:relationships" data-praxis-kind="architecture_c4_list">
<h2>Relationship</h2>
<ul>
<li>LinuxSimAppShellConfig -&gt; apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_app_shell.h#L12</li>
<li>LinuxSimRuntimeSource::ScreenGraphAdoption -&gt; apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry.h#L15</li>
<li>&amp; LinuxSimAppShell::config() const -&gt; apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_app_shell.cpp#L20</li>
<li>LinuxSimRuntimeEntry::screenCount -&gt; apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry.cpp#L40</li>
<li>LinuxSimRuntimeEntry::usingPrimaryScreenGraph -&gt; apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry.cpp#L24</li>
<li>LinuxSimRuntimeEntryAdoptionProbe::screenCount -&gt; apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry_adoption_probe.cpp#L41</li>
<li>LinuxSimRuntimeRenderer::usedPrimaryScreenGraph -&gt; apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_renderer.cpp#L31</li>
<li>LinuxSimRuntimeRenderer::usingPrimaryScreenGraph -&gt; apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_renderer.cpp#L26</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section class="semantic-layer" data-praxis-anchor="architecture:c4:business-relation" data-praxis-kind="architecture_c4_list">
<h2>Relationship with business complexity</h2>
<ul>
<li>Code View is not a business explanation portal; it only provides underlying evidence when the business story needs to be traced back to the implementation anchor.</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section class="semantic-layer" data-praxis-anchor="architecture:c4:engineering-relation" data-praxis-kind="architecture_c4_list">
<h2>Relationship with technical complexity</h2>
<ul>
<li>The software structure model is responsible for continuing to explain signs of reuse, signs of external collaboration, Sequence, complexity candidate points, and code evidence previews.</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section class="semantic-layer diagram-section" data-praxis-anchor="architecture:c4:diagram" data-praxis-kind="architecture_c4_diagram">
<h2>C4 Code View diagram</h2>
<pre class="mermaid" data-praxis-anchor="architecture:c4:code:apps-linux_sim_shell:c4" data-praxis-c4-current-level="code" data-praxis-c4-layer-views="[{&quot;level&quot;:&quot;system_context&quot;,&quot;label&quot;:&quot;System Context&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;System Context: trail-mate&quot;,&quot;diagramTitle&quot;:&quot;C4 System Context Diagram&quot;,&quot;summary&quot;:&quot;System Context only displays the relationship between the target software system and external people/systems, and does not directly expand the internal Code; what is highlighted here is the boundary of the software system to which \&quot;apps/linux_sim_shell\&quot; belongs.&quot;,&quot;docPath&quot;:&quot;docs/architecture/c4/system-context/system-context.md&quot;,&quot;htmlPath&quot;:&quot;docs/architecture/c4/system-context/system-context.html&quot;,&quot;mermaid&quot;:&quot;flowchart LR\n actor[\&quot;Unnamed external actor\&quot;]\n system[\&quot;trail-mate\&quot;]\n external[\&quot;Unnamed external system\&quot;]\n actor --&gt;|Use / Call| system\n system -.-&gt;|Candidate Integration| external&quot;,&quot;highlightLabels&quot;:[&quot;apps/linux_sim_shell&quot;,&quot;apps/linux_sim_shell Container&quot;,&quot;apps/linux_sim_shell (system internal Container)&quot;,&quot;linux_sim_shell&quot;,&quot;trail-mate&quot;],&quot;current&quot;:false,&quot;missing&quot;:false},{&quot;level&quot;:&quot;container&quot;,&quot;label&quot;:&quot;Container&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Container boundary: apps/linux_sim_shell&quot;,&quot;diagramTitle&quot;:&quot;C4 Container diagram&quot;,&quot;summary&quot;:&quot;When switching to the Container layer, the corresponding position of \&quot;apps/linux_sim_shell\&quot; in the official document of this layer will be highlighted.&quot;,&quot;docPath&quot;:&quot;docs/architecture/c4/containers/apps-linux_sim_shell/container.md&quot;,&quot;htmlPath&quot;:&quot;docs/architecture/c4/containers/apps-linux_sim_shell/container.html&quot;,&quot;mermaid&quot;:&quot;flowchart LR\n container[\&quot;apps/linux_sim_shell\&quot;]\n dependency_1[\&quot;apps/esp32_lvgl\&quot;]\n container --&gt; dependency_1&quot;,&quot;highlightLabels&quot;:[&quot;apps/linux_sim_shell&quot;,&quot;apps/linux_sim_shell Container&quot;,&quot;apps/linux_sim_shell (system internal Container)&quot;,&quot;linux_sim_shell&quot;],&quot;current&quot;:false,&quot;missing&quot;:false},{&quot;level&quot;:&quot;component&quot;,&quot;label&quot;:&quot;Component&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;apps/linux_sim_shell &#183; Component not generated&quot;,&quot;diagramTitle&quot;:&quot;C4 Component diagram&quot;,&quot;summary&quot;:&quot;The current object does not have a separate Component document; the generation process does not draw insufficient evidence levels into a formal C4 diagram.&quot;,&quot;mermaid&quot;:&quot;flowchart LR\n focus[\&quot;apps/linux_sim_shell\&quot;]\n missing[\&quot;T\&quot;]\n focus -.-&gt; missing&quot;,&quot;highlightLabels&quot;:[&quot;apps/linux_sim_shell&quot;,&quot;apps/linux_sim_shell Container&quot;,&quot;apps/linux_sim_shell (system internal Container)&quot;,&quot;linux_sim_shell&quot;],&quot;current&quot;:false,&quot;missing&quot;:true},{&quot;level&quot;:&quot;code&quot;,&quot;label&quot;:&quot;Code&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;Code anchor: apps/linux_sim_shell&quot;,&quot;diagramTitle&quot;:&quot;C4 Code View diagram&quot;,&quot;summary&quot;:&quot;Currently reading the Code layer; the formal diagram below is the architectural projection of this layer.&quot;,&quot;docPath&quot;:&quot;docs/architecture/c4/code/apps-linux_sim_shell/code.md&quot;,&quot;htmlPath&quot;:&quot;docs/architecture/c4/code/apps-linux_sim_shell/code.html&quot;,&quot;mermaid&quot;:&quot;flowchart TB\n package[\&quot;apps/linux_sim_shell\&quot;]\n file_1[\&quot;apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_app_shell.h\&quot;]\n code_1[\&quot;LinuxSimAppShellConfig\&quot;]\n package --&gt; file_1\n file_1 --&gt; code_1\n file_2[\&quot;apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry.h\&quot;]\n code_2[\&quot;LinuxSimRuntimeSource::ScreenGraphAdoption\&quot;]\n package --&gt; file_2\n file_2 --&gt; code_2\n file_3[\&quot;apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_app_shell.cpp\&quot;]\n code_3[\&quot;&amp; LinuxSimAppShell::config() const\&quot;]\n package --&gt; file_3\n file_3 --&gt; code_3\n file_4[\&quot;apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry.cpp\&quot;]\n code_4[\&quot;LinuxSimRuntimeEntry::screenCount\&quot;]\n package --&gt; file_4\n file_4 --&gt; code_4\n file_5[\&quot;apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry.cpp\&quot;]\n code_5[\&quot;LinuxSimRuntimeEntry::usingPrimaryScreenGraph\&quot;]\n package --&gt; file_5\n file_5 --&gt; code_5\n file_6[\&quot;apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry_adoption_probe.cpp\&quot;]\n code_6[\&quot;LinuxSimRuntimeEntryAdoptionProbe::screenCount\&quot;]\n package --&gt; file_6\n file_6 --&gt; code_6\n file_7[\&quot;apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_renderer.cpp\&quot;]\n code_7[\&quot;LinuxSimRuntimeRenderer::usedPrimaryScreenGraph\&quot;]\n package --&gt; file_7\n file_7 --&gt; code_7\n file_8[\&quot;apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_renderer.cpp\&quot;]\n code_8[\&quot;LinuxSimRuntimeRenderer::usingPrimaryScreenGraph\&quot;]\n package --&gt; file_8\n file_8 --&gt; code_8&quot;,&quot;highlightLabels&quot;:[&quot;apps/linux_sim_shell&quot;,&quot;apps/linux_sim_shell Container&quot;,&quot;apps/linux_sim_shell (system internal Container)&quot;,&quot;linux_sim_shell&quot;],&quot;current&quot;:true,&quot;missing&quot;:false}]">flowchart TB
package[&quot;apps/linux_sim_shell&quot;]
file_1[&quot;apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_app_shell.h&quot;]
code_1[&quot;LinuxSimAppShellConfig&quot;]
package --&gt; file_1
file_1 --&gt; code_1
file_2[&quot;apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry.h&quot;]
code_2[&quot;LinuxSimRuntimeSource::ScreenGraphAdoption&quot;]
package --&gt; file_2
file_2 --&gt; code_2
file_3[&quot;apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_app_shell.cpp&quot;]
code_3[&quot;&amp; LinuxSimAppShell::config() const&quot;]
package --&gt; file_3
file_3 --&gt; code_3
file_4[&quot;apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry.cpp&quot;]
code_4[&quot;LinuxSimRuntimeEntry::screenCount&quot;]
package --&gt; file_4
file_4 --&gt; code_4
file_5[&quot;apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry.cpp&quot;]
code_5[&quot;LinuxSimRuntimeEntry::usingPrimaryScreenGraph&quot;]
package --&gt; file_5
file_5 --&gt; code_5
file_6[&quot;apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry_adoption_probe.cpp&quot;]
code_6[&quot;LinuxSimRuntimeEntryAdoptionProbe::screenCount&quot;]
package --&gt; file_6
file_6 --&gt; code_6
file_7[&quot;apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_renderer.cpp&quot;]
code_7[&quot;LinuxSimRuntimeRenderer::usedPrimaryScreenGraph&quot;]
package --&gt; file_7
file_7 --&gt; code_7
file_8[&quot;apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_renderer.cpp&quot;]
code_8[&quot;LinuxSimRuntimeRenderer::usingPrimaryScreenGraph&quot;]
package --&gt; file_8
file_8 --&gt; code_8</pre>
</section>
<section class="semantic-layer architecture-c4-elements" data-praxis-anchor="architecture:c4:code:apps-linux_sim_shell:elements" data-praxis-kind="architecture_c4_elements">
<h2>Explanation of elements in the diagram</h2>
<div class="layer-grid">
<article class="layer-card" data-praxis-anchor="architecture:c4:code-anchor:function:linuxsimappshellconfig:apps-linux_sim_shell-src-linux_sim_app_shell.h:12" data-praxis-kind="architecture_c4_element" data-praxis-confidence="medium" data-praxis-drilldowns="[]">
<h3>LinuxSimAppShellConfig</h3>
<p>Code · medium</p>
<p>LinuxSimAppShellConfig is the key code anchor of apps/linux_sim_shell, located at apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_app_shell.h#L12; the current warehouse evidence shows that it has signs of partial relationship and is suitable as a candidate anchor rather than a complete conclusion.</p>
<dl>
<div><dt>Responsibility</dt><dd>LinuxSimAppShellConfig is a partial implementation anchor: it places the responsibilities of upper-layer components on apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_app_shell.h#L12. The current relationship pressure is not high, but it can still be used as evidence to understand the implementation entrance.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Boundary</dt><dd>This anchor only explains one architectural point of apps/linux_sim_shell; it is not a complete source code structure, nor can it replace the code evidence preview of the software structure model.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Relationship meaning</dt><dd>LinuxSimAppShellConfig is put into Code View because it can trace the responsibilities of the upper-level Component back to specific files/symbols. When it is referenced or called by a large number of objects, priority should be given to understanding who depends on it; when it relies on too many external objects, priority should be given to understanding what external capabilities it orchestrates.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Why it belongs to this layer</dt><dd>It has precise file and line number evidence apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_app_shell.h#L12, so it belongs to the C4 Code layer; if you only discuss the boundaries of responsibilities, you should go back to Component or Container.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Drill-down intention</dt><dd>When drilling down or cutting to the software structure model, you should check the direct collaboration of the anchor point, nearby complexity candidate points and code snippets to determine whether the changes will spread.</dd></div>
</dl>
</article>
<article class="layer-card" data-praxis-anchor="architecture:c4:code-anchor:function:linuxsimruntimesource::screengraphadoption:apps-linux_sim_shell-src-linux_sim_runtime_entry.h:15" data-praxis-kind="architecture_c4_element" data-praxis-confidence="medium" data-praxis-drilldowns="[]">
<h3>LinuxSimRuntimeSource::ScreenGraphAdoption</h3>
<p>Code · medium</p>
<p>LinuxSimRuntimeSource::ScreenGraphAdoption is the key code anchor of apps/linux_sim_shell, located at apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry.h#L15; the current warehouse evidence shows that it has signs of partial relationships and is suitable as a candidate anchor rather than a complete conclusion.</p>
<dl>
<div><dt>Responsibility</dt><dd>LinuxSimRuntimeSource::ScreenGraphAdoption is a partial implementation anchor: it places the responsibility of the upper-layer component on apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry.h#L15. The current relationship pressure is not high, but it can still be used as evidence to understand the implementation entrance.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Boundary</dt><dd>This anchor only explains one architectural point of apps/linux_sim_shell; it is not a complete source code structure, nor can it replace the code evidence preview of the software structure model.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Relationship meaning</dt><dd>LinuxSimRuntimeSource::ScreenGraphAdoption is put into Code View because it can trace the responsibilities of the upper-level Component back to specific files/symbols. When it is referenced or called by a large number of objects, priority should be given to understanding who depends on it; when it relies on too many external objects, priority should be given to understanding what external capabilities it orchestrates.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Why it belongs to this layer</dt><dd>It has precise file and line number evidence apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry.h#L15, so it belongs to the C4 Code layer; if you only discuss the boundaries of responsibilities, you should go back to Component or Container.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Drill-down intention</dt><dd>When drilling down or cutting to the software structure model, you should check the direct collaboration of the anchor point, nearby complexity candidate points and code snippets to determine whether the changes will spread.</dd></div>
</dl>
</article>
<article class="layer-card" data-praxis-anchor="architecture:c4:code-anchor:function:-linuxsimappshell::config-const:apps-linux_sim_shell-src-linux_sim_app_shell.cpp:20" data-praxis-kind="architecture_c4_element" data-praxis-confidence="medium" data-praxis-drilldowns="[]">
<h3>&amp; LinuxSimAppShell::config() const</h3>
<p>Code · medium</p>
<p>& LinuxSimAppShell::config() const is the key code anchor of apps/linux_sim_shell, located at apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_app_shell.cpp#L20; the current warehouse evidence shows that it has signs of partial relationship and is suitable as a candidate anchor rather than a complete conclusion.</p>
<dl>
<div><dt>Responsibility</dt><dd>& LinuxSimAppShell::config() const is a partial implementation anchor: it places the upper-layer component responsibilities on apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_app_shell.cpp#L20. The current relationship pressure is not high, but it can still be used as evidence to understand the implementation entry.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Boundary</dt><dd>This anchor only explains one architectural point of apps/linux_sim_shell; it is not a complete source code structure, nor can it replace the code evidence preview of the software structure model.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Relationship meaning</dt><dd>& LinuxSimAppShell::config() const is put into Code View because it can trace the responsibilities of the upper-level Component to specific files/symbols. When it is referenced or called by a large number of objects, priority should be given to understanding who depends on it; when it relies on too many external objects, priority should be given to understanding what external capabilities it orchestrates.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Why it belongs to this layer</dt><dd>It has precise file and line number evidence apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_app_shell.cpp#L20, so it belongs to the C4 Code layer; if you only discuss the boundaries of responsibilities, you should go back to Component or Container.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Drill-down intention</dt><dd>When drilling down or cutting to the software structure model, you should check the direct collaboration of the anchor point, nearby complexity candidate points and code snippets to determine whether the changes will spread.</dd></div>
</dl>
</article>
<article class="layer-card" data-praxis-anchor="architecture:c4:code-anchor:function:linuxsimruntimeentry::screencount:apps-linux_sim_shell-src-linux_sim_runtime_entry.cpp:40" data-praxis-kind="architecture_c4_element" data-praxis-confidence="medium" data-praxis-drilldowns="[]">
<h3>LinuxSimRuntimeEntry::screenCount</h3>
<p>Code · medium</p>
<p>LinuxSimRuntimeEntry::screenCount is the key code anchor of apps/linux_sim_shell, located at apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry.cpp#L40; the current warehouse evidence shows that it has signs of partial relationship and is suitable as a candidate anchor rather than a complete conclusion.</p>
<dl>
<div><dt>Responsibility</dt><dd>LinuxSimRuntimeEntry::screenCount is a partial implementation anchor: it places the upper-layer component responsibilities on apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry.cpp#L40. The current relationship pressure is not high, but it can still be used as evidence to understand the implementation entry.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Boundary</dt><dd>This anchor only explains one architectural point of apps/linux_sim_shell; it is not a complete source code structure, nor can it replace the code evidence preview of the software structure model.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Relationship meaning</dt><dd>LinuxSimRuntimeEntry::screenCount is put into Code View because it can trace the responsibilities of the upper-level Component back to specific files/symbols. When it is referenced or called by a large number of objects, priority should be given to understanding who depends on it; when it relies on too many external objects, priority should be given to understanding what external capabilities it orchestrates.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Why it belongs to this layer</dt><dd>I</dd></div>
<div><dt>Drill-down intention</dt><dd>When drilling down or cutting to the software structure model, you should check the direct collaboration of the anchor point, nearby complexity candidate points and code snippets to determine whether the changes will spread.</dd></div>
</dl>
</article>
<article class="layer-card" data-praxis-anchor="architecture:c4:code-anchor:function:linuxsimruntimeentry::usingprimaryscreengraph:apps-linux_sim_shell-src-linux_sim_runtime_entry.cpp:24" data-praxis-kind="architecture_c4_element" data-praxis-confidence="medium" data-praxis-drilldowns="[]">
<h3>LinuxSimRuntimeEntry::usingPrimaryScreenGraph</h3>
<p>Code · medium</p>
<p>LinuxSimRuntimeEntry::usingPrimaryScreenGraph is the key code anchor of apps/linux_sim_shell, located at apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry.cpp#L24; the current warehouse evidence shows that it has signs of partial relationships and is suitable as a candidate anchor rather than a complete conclusion.</p>
<dl>
<div><dt>Responsibility</dt><dd>LinuxSimRuntimeEntry::usingPrimaryScreenGraph is a partial implementation anchor: it places the responsibilities of upper-layer components on apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry.cpp#L24. The current relationship pressure is not high, but it can still be used as evidence to understand the implementation entry.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Boundary</dt><dd>This anchor only explains one architectural point of apps/linux_sim_shell; it is not a complete source code structure, nor can it replace the code evidence preview of the software structure model.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Relationship meaning</dt><dd>LinuxSimRuntimeEntry::usingPrimaryScreenGraph is put into Code View because it can trace the responsibilities of the upper-level Component back to specific files/symbols. When it is referenced or called by a large number of objects, priority should be given to understanding who depends on it; when it relies on too many external objects, priority should be given to understanding what external capabilities it orchestrates.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Why it belongs to this layer</dt><dd>It has precise file and line number evidence apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry.cpp#L24, so it belongs to the C4 Code layer; if you only discuss the boundaries of responsibilities, you should go back to Component or Container.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Drill-down intention</dt><dd>When drilling down or cutting to the software structure model, you should check the direct collaboration of the anchor point, nearby complexity candidate points and code snippets to determine whether the changes will spread.</dd></div>
</dl>
</article>
<article class="layer-card" data-praxis-anchor="architecture:c4:code-anchor:function:linuxsimruntimeentryadoptionprobe::screencount:apps-linux_sim_shell-src-linux_sim_runtime_entry_adoption_probe.cpp:41" data-praxis-kind="architecture_c4_element" data-praxis-confidence="medium" data-praxis-drilldowns="[]">
<h3>LinuxSimRuntimeEntryAdoptionProbe::screenCount</h3>
<p>Code · medium</p>
<p>LinuxSimRuntimeEntryAdoptionProbe::screenCount is the key code anchor of apps/linux_sim_shell, located at apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry_adoption_probe.cpp#L41; the current warehouse evidence shows that it has signs of partial relationship and is suitable as a candidate anchor rather than a complete conclusion.</p>
<dl>
<div><dt>Responsibility</dt><dd>LinuxSimRuntimeEntryAdoptionProbe::screenCount is a partial implementation anchor: it places the responsibility of the upper-layer component on apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry_adoption_probe.cpp#L41. The current relationship pressure is not high, but it can still be used as evidence to understand the implementation entrance.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Boundary</dt><dd>This anchor only explains one architectural point of apps/linux_sim_shell; it is not a complete source code structure, nor can it replace the code evidence preview of the software structure model.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Relationship meaning</dt><dd>LinuxSimRuntimeEntryAdoptionProbe::screenCount is put into Code View because it can trace the responsibilities of the upper-level Component back to specific files/symbols. When it is referenced or called by a large number of objects, priority should be given to understanding who depends on it; when it relies on too many external objects, priority should be given to understanding what external capabilities it orchestrates.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Why it belongs to this layer</dt><dd>It has the exact file and line number evidence apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry_adoption_probe.cpp#L41, so it belongs to the C4 Code layer; if you only discuss the boundaries of responsibilities, you should go back to Component or Container.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Drill-down intention</dt><dd>When drilling down or cutting to the software structure model, you should check the direct collaboration of the anchor point, nearby complexity candidate points and code snippets to determine whether the changes will spread.</dd></div>
</dl>
</article>
<article class="layer-card" data-praxis-anchor="architecture:c4:code-anchor:function:linuxsimruntimerenderer::usedprimaryscreengraph:apps-linux_sim_shell-src-linux_sim_runtime_renderer.cpp:31" data-praxis-kind="architecture_c4_element" data-praxis-confidence="medium" data-praxis-drilldowns="[]">
<h3>LinuxSimRuntimeRenderer::usedPrimaryScreenGraph</h3>
<p>Code · medium</p>
<p>LinuxSimRuntimeRenderer::usedPrimaryScreenGraph is the key code anchor of apps/linux_sim_shell, located at apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_renderer.cpp#L31; the current warehouse evidence shows that it has signs of partial relationships and is suitable as a candidate anchor rather than a complete conclusion.</p>
<dl>
<div><dt>Responsibility</dt><dd>LinuxSimRuntimeRenderer::usedPrimaryScreenGraph is a partial implementation anchor: it places the upper-layer component responsibilities on apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_renderer.cpp#L31. The current relationship pressure is not high, but it can still be used as evidence to understand the implementation entrance.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Boundary</dt><dd>This anchor only explains one architectural point of apps/linux_sim_shell; it is not a complete source code structure, nor can it replace the code evidence preview of the software structure model.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Relationship meaning</dt><dd>LinuxSimRuntimeRenderer::usedPrimaryScreenGraph is put into Code View because it can trace the responsibilities of the upper-level Component back to specific files/symbols. When it is referenced or called by a large number of objects, priority should be given to understanding who depends on it; when it relies on too many external objects, priority should be given to understanding what external capabilities it orchestrates.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Why it belongs to this layer</dt><dd>It has the exact file and line number evidence apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_renderer.cpp#L31, so it belongs to the C4 Code layer; if you only discuss the boundaries of responsibilities, you should go back to Component or Container.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Drill-down intention</dt><dd>When drilling down or cutting to the software structure model, you should check the direct collaboration of the anchor point, nearby complexity candidate points and code snippets to determine whether the changes will spread.</dd></div>
</dl>
</article>
<article class="layer-card" data-praxis-anchor="architecture:c4:code-anchor:function:linuxsimruntimerenderer::usingprimaryscreengraph:apps-linux_sim_shell-src-linux_sim_runtime_renderer.cpp:26" data-praxis-kind="architecture_c4_element" data-praxis-confidence="medium" data-praxis-drilldowns="[]">
<h3>LinuxSimRuntimeRenderer::usingPrimaryScreenGraph</h3>
<p>Code · medium</p>
<p>LinuxSimRuntimeRenderer::usingPrimaryScreenGraph is the key code anchor of apps/linux_sim_shell, located at apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_renderer.cpp#L26; the current warehouse evidence shows that it has signs of partial relationships and is suitable as a candidate anchor rather than a complete conclusion.</p>
<dl>
<div><dt>Responsibility</dt><dd>LinuxSimRuntimeRenderer::usingPrimaryScreenGraph is a partial implementation anchor: it places the responsibilities of upper-layer components on apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_renderer.cpp#L26. The current relationship pressure is not high, but it can still be used as evidence to understand the implementation entrance.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Boundary</dt><dd>This anchor only explains one architectural point of apps/linux_sim_shell; it is not a complete source code structure, nor can it replace the code evidence preview of the software structure model.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Relationship meaning</dt><dd>LinuxSimRuntimeRenderer::usingPrimaryScreenGraph is put into Code View because it can trace the responsibilities of the upper-level Component back to specific files/symbols. When it is referenced or called by a large number of objects, priority should be given to understanding who depends on it; when it relies on too many external objects, priority should be given to understanding what external capabilities it orchestrates.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Why it belongs to this layer</dt><dd>It has precise file and line number evidence apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_renderer.cpp#L26, so it belongs to the C4 Code layer; if you only discuss the boundaries of responsibilities, you should go back to Component or Container.</dd></div>
<div><dt>Drill-down intention</dt><dd>When drilling down or cutting to the software structure model, you should check the direct collaboration of the anchor point, nearby complexity candidate points and code snippets to determine whether the changes will spread.</dd></div>
</dl>
</article>
</div>
</section>
<section class="semantic-layer architecture-c4-links" data-praxis-anchor="architecture:c4:drilldowns" data-praxis-kind="architecture_c4_links">
<h2>Can drill down to C4</h2>
<p>None yet.</p>
</section>
<section class="semantic-layer architecture-c4-links" data-praxis-anchor="architecture:c4:engineering-links" data-praxis-kind="architecture_c4_links">
<h2>Associated software structure model</h2>
<p>None yet.</p>
</section>
<section class="semantic-layer" data-praxis-anchor="architecture:c4:evidence" data-praxis-kind="architecture_c4_list">
<h2>Evidence</h2>
<ul>
<li>apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_app_shell.h#L12</li>
<li>apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry.h#L15</li>
<li>apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_app_shell.cpp#L20</li>
<li>apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry.cpp#L40</li>
<li>apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry.cpp#L24</li>
<li>apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry_adoption_probe.cpp#L41</li>
<li>apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_renderer.cpp#L31</li>
<li>apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_renderer.cpp#L26</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section class="semantic-layer" data-praxis-anchor="architecture:c4:questions" data-praxis-kind="architecture_c4_list">
<h2>Judgment basis</h2>
<ul>
<li>Code View only lists a small number of file/symbol anchors that can trace Component implementations; it is not a source code browser, and it does not host business processes or complete class diagrams.</li>
</ul>
</section>
<script type="application/json" id="praxis-architecture-c4-document">{"id":"architecture:c4:code:apps-linux_sim_shell","level":"code","title":"Code anchor: apps/linux_sim_shell","summary":"Explain a few key code anchors in apps/linux_sim_shell from the C4 Code layer. The Code layer is not a code browser and is only used when you need to understand how architectural components fall into specific files/symbols.","docPath":"docs/architecture/c4/code/apps-linux_sim_shell/code.md","htmlPath":"docs/architecture/c4/code/apps-linux_sim_shell/code.html","anchor":"architecture:c4:code:apps-linux_sim_shell","status":"candidate","confidence":"medium","mermaid":"flowchart TB\n package[\"apps/linux_sim_shell\"]\n file_1[\"apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_app_shell.h\"]\n code_1[\"LinuxSimAppShellConfig\"]\n package --> file_1\n file_1 --> code_1\n file_2[\"apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry.h\"]\n code_2[\"LinuxSimRuntimeSource::ScreenGraphAdoption\"]\n package --> file_2\n file_2 --> code_2\n file_3[\"apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_app_shell.cpp\"]\n code_3[\"& LinuxSimAppShell::config() const\"]\n package --> file_3\n file_3 --> code_3\n file_4[\"apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry.cpp\"]\n code_4[\"LinuxSimRuntimeEntry::screenCount\"]\n package --> file_4\n file_4 --> code_4\n file_5[\"apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry.cpp\"]\n code_5[\"LinuxSimRuntimeEntry::usingPrimaryScreenGraph\"]\n package --> file_5\n file_5 --> code_5\n file_6[\"apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry_adoption_probe.cpp\"]\n code_6[\"LinuxSimRuntimeEntryAdoptionProbe::screenCount\"]\n package --> file_6\n file_6 --> code_6\n file_7[\"apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_renderer.cpp\"]\n code_7[\"LinuxSimRuntimeRenderer::usedPrimaryScreenGraph\"]\n package --> file_7\n file_7 --> code_7\n file_8[\"apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_renderer.cpp\"]\n code_8[\"LinuxSimRuntimeRenderer::usingPrimaryScreenGraph\"]\n package --> file_8\n file_8 --> code_8","responsibility":" Further reduce the architectural components of apps/linux_sim_shell to specific files, functions, classes, interfaces or component anchors to help users understand the implementation entry and the impact of changes.","boundary":"Code View only displays necessary anchor points and does not list the full source code; the complete structural explanation, code snippets and complexity candidate points should still be viewed back to the software structure model or IDE.","relationships":["LinuxSimAppShellConfig -> apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_app_shell.h#L12","LinuxSimRuntimeSource::ScreenGraphAdoption -> apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry.h#L15","& LinuxSimAppShell::config() const -> apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_app_shell.cpp#L20","LinuxSimRuntimeEntry::screenCount -> apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry.cpp#L40","LinuxSimRuntimeEntry::usingPrimaryScreenGraph -> apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry.cpp#L24","LinuxSimRuntimeEntryAdoptionProbe::screenCount -> apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry_adoption_probe.cpp#L41","LinuxSimRuntimeRenderer::usedPrimaryScreenGraph -> apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_renderer.cpp#L31","LinuxSimRuntimeRenderer::usingPrimaryScreenGraph -> apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_renderer.cpp#L26"],"businessRelation":["Code View is not a business explanation portal; it only provides underlying evidence when the business story needs to be traced back to the implementation anchor."],"engineeringRelation":["The software structure model is responsible for continuing to explain signs of reuse, signs of external collaboration, Sequence, complexity candidate points, and code evidence previews."],"evidencePaths":["apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_app_shell.h#L12","apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry.h#L15","apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_app_shell.cpp#L20","apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry.cpp#L40","apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry.cpp#L24","apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry_adoption_probe.cpp#L41","apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_renderer.cpp#L31","apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_renderer.cpp#L26"],"questions":["Code View only lists a small number of file/symbol anchors that can trace Component implementations; it is not a source code browser, and it does not host business processes or complete class diagrams."],"scope":{"packageId":"apps/linux_sim_shell","filePath":"apps/linux_sim_shell"},"elements":[{"id":"architecture:c4:code-anchor:function:linuxsimappshellconfig:apps-linux_sim_shell-src-linux_sim_app_shell.h:12","label":"LinuxSimAppShellConfig","level":"code","anchor":"architecture:c4:code-anchor:function:linuxsimappshellconfig:apps-linux_sim_shell-src-linux_sim_app_shell.h:12","summary":"LinuxSimAppShellConfig is the key code anchor of apps/linux_sim_shell, located at apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_app_shell.h#L12; the current warehouse evidence shows that it has signs of partial relationship and is suitable as a candidate anchor rather than a complete conclusion.","responsibility":"LinuxSimAppShellConfig is a partial implementation anchor: it places the responsibilities of upper-layer components on apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_app_shell.h#L12. The current relationship pressure is not high, but it can still be used as evidence to understand the implementation entrance.","boundary":"This anchor only explains one architectural point of apps/linux_sim_shell; it is not a complete source code structure, nor can it replace the code evidence preview of the software structure model.","relationshipMeaning":"LinuxSimAppShellConfig is put into Code View because it can trace the responsibilities of the upper-level Component back to specific files/symbols. When it is referenced or called by a large number of objects, priority should be given to understanding who depends on it; when it relies on too many external objects, priority should be given to understanding what external capabilities it orchestrates.","whyThisLevel":"It has precise file and line number evidence apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_app_shell.h#L12, so it belongs to the C4 Code layer; if you only discuss the boundaries of responsibilities, you should go back to Component or Container.","drilldownIntent":"When drilling down or cutting to the software structure model, you should check the direct collaboration of the anchor point, nearby complexity candidate points and code snippets to determine whether the changes will spread.","evidence":["apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_app_shell.h#L12","Reuse signs: There are local reuse or dependency clues","External collaboration signs: No obvious external collaboration clues are currently observed"],"confidence":"medium","drilldowns":[]},{"id":"architecture:c4:code-anchor:function:linuxsimruntimesource::screengraphadoption:apps-linux_sim_shell-src-linux_sim_runtime_entry.h:15","label":"LinuxSimRuntimeSource::ScreenGraphAdoption","level":"code","anchor":"architecture:c4:code-anchor:function:linuxsimruntimesource::screengraphadoption:apps-linux_sim_shell-src-linux_sim_runtime_entry.h:15","summary":"LinuxSimRuntimeSource::ScreenGraphAdoption is the key code anchor of apps/linux_sim_shell, located at apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry.h#L15; the current warehouse evidence shows that it has signs of partial relationships and is suitable as a candidate anchor rather than a complete conclusion.","responsibility":"LinuxSimRuntimeSource::ScreenGraphAdoption is a partial implementation anchor: it places the responsibility of the upper-layer component on apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry.h#L15. The current relationship pressure is not high, but it can still be used as evidence to understand the implementation entrance.","boundary":"This anchor only explains one architectural point of apps/linux_sim_shell; it is not a complete source code structure, nor can it replace the code evidence preview of the software structure model.","relationshipMeaning":"LinuxSimRuntimeSource::ScreenGraphAdoption is put into Code View because it can trace the responsibilities of the upper-level Component back to specific files/symbols. When it is referenced or called by a large number of objects, priority should be given to understanding who depends on it; when it relies on too many external objects, priority should be given to understanding what external capabilities it orchestrates.","whyThisLevel":"It has precise file and line number evidence apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry.h#L15, so it belongs to the C4 Code layer; if you only discuss the boundaries of responsibilities, you should go back to Component or Container.","drilldownIntent":"When drilling down or cutting to the software structure model, you should check the direct collaboration of the anchor point, nearby complexity candidate points and code snippets to determine whether the changes will spread.","evidence":["apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry.h#L15","Reuse signs: There are local reuse or dependency clues","External collaboration signs: No obvious external collaboration clues are currently observed"],"confidence":"medium","drilldowns":[]},{"id":"architecture:c4:code-anchor:function:-linuxsimappshell::config-const:apps-linux_sim_shell-src-linux_sim_app_shell.cpp:20","label":"& LinuxSimAppShell::config() const","level":"code","anchor":"architecture:c4:code-anchor:function:-linuxsimappshell::config-const:apps-linux_sim_shell-src-linux_sim_app_shell.cpp:20","summary":"& LinuxSimAppShell::config() const is the key code anchor of apps/linux_sim_shell, located at apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_app_shell.cpp#L20; the current warehouse evidence shows that it has signs of partial relationship and is suitable as a candidate anchor rather than a complete conclusion.","responsibility":"& LinuxSimAppShell::config() const is a partial implementation anchor: it places the upper-layer component responsibilities on apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_app_shell.cpp#L20. The current relationship pressure is not high, but it can still be used as evidence to understand the implementation entry.","boundary":"This anchor only explains one architectural point of apps/linux_sim_shell; it is not a complete source code structure, nor can it replace the code evidence preview of the software structure model.","relationshipMeaning":"& LinuxSimAppShell::config() const is put into Code View because it can trace the responsibilities of the upper-level Component back to specific files/symbols. When it is referenced or called by a large number of objects, priority should be given to understanding who depends on it; when it relies on too many external objects, priority should be given to understanding what external capabilities it orchestrates.","whyThisLevel":"It has precise file and line number evidence apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_app_shell.cpp#L20, so it belongs to the C4 Code layer; if you only discuss the boundaries of responsibilities, you should go back to Component or Container.","drilldownIntent":"When drilling down or cutting to the software structure model, you should check the direct collaboration of the anchor point, nearby complexity candidate points and code snippets to determine whether the changes will spread.","evidence":["apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_app_shell.cpp#L20","Reuse signs: There are local reuse or dependency clues","External collaboration signs: No obvious external collaboration clues are currently observed"],"confidence":"medium","drilldowns":[]},{"id":"architecture:c4:code-anchor:function:linuxsimruntimeentry::screencount:apps-linux_sim_shell-src-linux_sim_runtime_entry.cpp:40","label":"LinuxSimRuntimeEntry::screenCount","level":"code","anchor":"architecture:c4:code-anchor:function:linuxsimruntimeentry::screencount:apps-linux_sim_shell-src-linux_sim_runtime_entry.cpp:40","summary":"LinuxSimRuntimeEntry::screenCount is the key code anchor of apps/linux_sim_shell, located at apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry.cpp#L40; the current warehouse evidence shows that it has signs of partial relationship and is suitable as a candidate anchor rather than a complete conclusion.","responsibility":"LinuxSimRuntimeEntry::screenCount is a partial implementation anchor: it places the upper-layer component responsibilities on apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry.cpp#L40. The current relationship pressure is not high, but it can still be used as evidence to understand the implementation entry.","boundary":"This anchor only explains one architectural point of apps/linux_sim_shell; it is not a complete source code structure, nor can it replace the code evidence preview of the software structure model.","relationshipMeaning":"LinuxSimRuntimeEntry::screenCount is put into Code View because it can trace the responsibilities of the upper-level Component back to specific files/symbols. When it is referenced or called by a large number of objects, priority should be given to understanding who depends on it; when it relies on too many external objects, priority should be given to understanding what external capabilities it orchestrates.","whyThisLevel":"I","drilldownIntent":"When drilling down or cutting to the software structure model, you should check the direct collaboration of the anchor point, nearby complexity candidate points and code snippets to determine whether the changes will spread.","evidence":["apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry.cpp#L40","Reuse signs: There are local reuse or dependency clues","External collaboration signs: No obvious external collaboration clues are currently observed"],"confidence":"medium","drilldowns":[]},{"id":"architecture:c4:code-anchor:function:linuxsimruntimeentry::usingprimaryscreengraph:apps-linux_sim_shell-src-linux_sim_runtime_entry.cpp:24","label":"LinuxSimRuntimeEntry::usingPrimaryScreenGraph","level":"code","anchor":"architecture:c4:code-anchor:function:linuxsimruntimeentry::usingprimaryscreengraph:apps-linux_sim_shell-src-linux_sim_runtime_entry.cpp:24","summary":"LinuxSimRuntimeEntry::usingPrimaryScreenGraph is the key code anchor of apps/linux_sim_shell, located at apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry.cpp#L24; the current warehouse evidence shows that it has signs of partial relationships and is suitable as a candidate anchor rather than a complete conclusion.","responsibility":"LinuxSimRuntimeEntry::usingPrimaryScreenGraph is a partial implementation anchor: it places the responsibilities of upper-layer components on apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry.cpp#L24. The current relationship pressure is not high, but it can still be used as evidence to understand the implementation entry.","boundary":"This anchor only explains one architectural point of apps/linux_sim_shell; it is not a complete source code structure, nor can it replace the code evidence preview of the software structure model.","relationshipMeaning":"LinuxSimRuntimeEntry::usingPrimaryScreenGraph is put into Code View because it can trace the responsibilities of the upper-level Component back to specific files/symbols. When it is referenced or called by a large number of objects, priority should be given to understanding who depends on it; when it relies on too many external objects, priority should be given to understanding what external capabilities it orchestrates.","whyThisLevel":"It has precise file and line number evidence apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry.cpp#L24, so it belongs to the C4 Code layer; if you only discuss the boundaries of responsibilities, you should go back to Component or Container.","drilldownIntent":"When drilling down or cutting to the software structure model, you should check the direct collaboration of the anchor point, nearby complexity candidate points and code snippets to determine whether the changes will spread.","evidence":["apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry.cpp#L24","Reuse signs: There are local reuse or dependency clues","External collaboration signs: No obvious external collaboration clues are currently observed"],"confidence":"medium","drilldowns":[]},{"id":"architecture:c4:code-anchor:function:linuxsimruntimeentryadoptionprobe::screencount:apps-linux_sim_shell-src-linux_sim_runtime_entry_adoption_probe.cpp:41","label":"LinuxSimRuntimeEntryAdoptionProbe::screenCount","level":"code","anchor":"architecture:c4:code-anchor:function:linuxsimruntimeentryadoptionprobe::screencount:apps-linux_sim_shell-src-linux_sim_runtime_entry_adoption_probe.cpp:41","summary":"LinuxSimRuntimeEntryAdoptionProbe::screenCount is the key code anchor of apps/linux_sim_shell, located at apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry_adoption_probe.cpp#L41; the current warehouse evidence shows that it has signs of partial relationship and is suitable as a candidate anchor rather than a complete conclusion.","responsibility":"LinuxSimRuntimeEntryAdoptionProbe::screenCount is a partial implementation anchor: it places the responsibility of the upper-layer component on apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry_adoption_probe.cpp#L41. The current relationship pressure is not high, but it can still be used as evidence to understand the implementation entrance.","boundary":"This anchor only explains one architectural point of apps/linux_sim_shell; it is not a complete source code structure, nor can it replace the code evidence preview of the software structure model.","relationshipMeaning":"LinuxSimRuntimeEntryAdoptionProbe::screenCount is put into Code View because it can trace the responsibilities of the upper-level Component back to specific files/symbols. When it is referenced or called by a large number of objects, priority should be given to understanding who depends on it; when it relies on too many external objects, priority should be given to understanding what external capabilities it orchestrates.","whyThisLevel":"It has the exact file and line number evidence apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry_adoption_probe.cpp#L41, so it belongs to the C4 Code layer; if you only discuss the boundaries of responsibilities, you should go back to Component or Container.","drilldownIntent":"When drilling down or cutting to the software structure model, you should check the direct collaboration of the anchor point, nearby complexity candidate points and code snippets to determine whether the changes will spread.","evidence":["apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_entry_adoption_probe.cpp#L41","Reuse signs: There are local reuse or dependency clues","External collaboration signs: No obvious external collaboration clues are currently observed"],"confidence":"medium","drilldowns":[]},{"id":"architecture:c4:code-anchor:function:linuxsimruntimerenderer::usedprimaryscreengraph:apps-linux_sim_shell-src-linux_sim_runtime_renderer.cpp:31","label":"LinuxSimRuntimeRenderer::usedPrimaryScreenGraph","level":"code","anchor":"architecture:c4:code-anchor:function:linuxsimruntimerenderer::usedprimaryscreengraph:apps-linux_sim_shell-src-linux_sim_runtime_renderer.cpp:31","summary":"LinuxSimRuntimeRenderer::usedPrimaryScreenGraph is the key code anchor of apps/linux_sim_shell, located at apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_renderer.cpp#L31; the current warehouse evidence shows that it has signs of partial relationships and is suitable as a candidate anchor rather than a complete conclusion.","responsibility":"LinuxSimRuntimeRenderer::usedPrimaryScreenGraph is a partial implementation anchor: it places the upper-layer component responsibilities on apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_renderer.cpp#L31. The current relationship pressure is not high, but it can still be used as evidence to understand the implementation entrance.","boundary":"This anchor only explains one architectural point of apps/linux_sim_shell; it is not a complete source code structure, nor can it replace the code evidence preview of the software structure model.","relationshipMeaning":"LinuxSimRuntimeRenderer::usedPrimaryScreenGraph is put into Code View because it can trace the responsibilities of the upper-level Component back to specific files/symbols. When it is referenced or called by a large number of objects, priority should be given to understanding who depends on it; when it relies on too many external objects, priority should be given to understanding what external capabilities it orchestrates.","whyThisLevel":"It has the exact file and line number evidence apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_renderer.cpp#L31, so it belongs to the C4 Code layer; if you only discuss the boundaries of responsibilities, you should go back to Component or Container.","drilldownIntent":"When drilling down or cutting to the software structure model, you should check the direct collaboration of the anchor point, nearby complexity candidate points and code snippets to determine whether the changes will spread.","evidence":["apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_renderer.cpp#L31","Reuse signs: There are local reuse or dependency clues","External collaboration signs: No obvious external collaboration clues are currently observed"],"confidence":"medium","drilldowns":[]},{"id":"architecture:c4:code-anchor:function:linuxsimruntimerenderer::usingprimaryscreengraph:apps-linux_sim_shell-src-linux_sim_runtime_renderer.cpp:26","label":"LinuxSimRuntimeRenderer::usingPrimaryScreenGraph","level":"code","anchor":"architecture:c4:code-anchor:function:linuxsimruntimerenderer::usingprimaryscreengraph:apps-linux_sim_shell-src-linux_sim_runtime_renderer.cpp:26","summary":"LinuxSimRuntimeRenderer::usingPrimaryScreenGraph is the key code anchor of apps/linux_sim_shell, located at apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_renderer.cpp#L26; the current warehouse evidence shows that it has signs of partial relationships and is suitable as a candidate anchor rather than a complete conclusion.","responsibility":"LinuxSimRuntimeRenderer::usingPrimaryScreenGraph is a partial implementation anchor: it places the responsibilities of upper-layer components on apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_renderer.cpp#L26. The current relationship pressure is not high, but it can still be used as evidence to understand the implementation entrance.","boundary":"This anchor only explains one architectural point of apps/linux_sim_shell; it is not a complete source code structure, nor can it replace the code evidence preview of the software structure model.","relationshipMeaning":"LinuxSimRuntimeRenderer::usingPrimaryScreenGraph is put into Code View because it can trace the responsibilities of the upper-level Component back to specific files/symbols. When it is referenced or called by a large number of objects, priority should be given to understanding who depends on it; when it relies on too many external objects, priority should be given to understanding what external capabilities it orchestrates.","whyThisLevel":"It has precise file and line number evidence apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_renderer.cpp#L26, so it belongs to the C4 Code layer; if you only discuss the boundaries of responsibilities, you should go back to Component or Container.","drilldownIntent":"When drilling down or cutting to the software structure model, you should check the direct collaboration of the anchor point, nearby complexity candidate points and code snippets to determine whether the changes will spread.","evidence":["apps/linux_sim_shell/src/linux_sim_runtime_renderer.cpp#L26","Reuse signs: There are local reuse or dependency clues","External collaboration signs: No obvious external collaboration clues are currently observed"],"confidence":"medium","drilldowns":[]}],"drilldowns":[],"relatedEngineeringDocs":[]}</script>
</main>
</body>
</html>
Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink